preview

Pros And Cons Of Fda

Good Essays

. The FDA notes a long list in the article of what they are used for: "GE plants are used to make ingredients that are then used in other food products. Such ingredients include: corn starch in soups and sauces, corn syrup used as a sweetener, corn oil, canola oil and soybean oil in mayonnaise, salad dressings, breads, and snack foods, sugar from sugar beets in various foods. Other major crops with GE varieties include potatoes, squash, apples and papayas." It is surprising to me exactly how much food is processed using genetically modified crops. In this same article the FDA claims GE plants are safe to eat, and that they are just as safe as non-GE foods are. The testing of these crops to see if they are safe for human and animal consumption …show more content…

In the handbook titled GM Foods written by David E. Newton there is a section that explains why GM foods are not labelled, which caused outrage back in the 90s. This section written by Dr. Phill Jones who earned his PhD in physiology and pharmacology. He was also a patent attorney. For ten years he specialized in biological, chemical and medical inventions. He states that "The FDA's authority comes from the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and according to the act, the FDA can only require information on a label that is accurate and material." He also mentions that the labeling of GM food would go against the FDA's regulation system. He mentions that the FDA uses science to evaluate the safety of foods and focuses on the characteristics more than how the plants were engineered. I would think that the safety of the food would also incorporate the plants' health, where and how it grows. He also claims that "advocates for GM food labeling claim that these labels would enable consumers to avoid health risks probably associated with GM foods." I believe people should be aware of what they are eating and have a choice to buy the products or not. We should know where the food is coming from and exactly what and how it is produced or modified. Without labeling people are forced to continue eating GM foods …show more content…

Especially now since they have been in the food source for over twenty years there are still concerns with the resistance of antibiotics. Labeling would give consumers a choice. It is their right to know what is in the products they are consuming. Sydney Lupkin mentions an opposing view of GM food safety in a news article. He mentioned that Lisa Cimperman, who is a clinical dietitian, claims that there is no evidence that genetically modified foods are unsafe and that there simply isn't any real evidence that proves otherwise. I feel it is possible that there is no evidence because the testing is left up to the food developers who are making a larger profit by mass producing GM crops. It is also noted in the article that in 1990 genetically modified soybeans caused allergic reactions in people with Brazil Nut allergies. They found that the soybeans contained a gene from the Brazil Nut. Production was stopped on that specific soybean. This crop was modified, and some people had an allergic reaction to it. If these genes are being absorbed and causing allergic reactions then, in my opinion, antibiotic resistant markers that are

Get Access