Clones are organisms or individuals whose DNA is identical. Cloning can happen through natural process, in identical twins, or artificially in lab. Even though scientists have been successfully cloning animals since 1996, human cloning is yet legal and prioritized in research in numerous countries (“The Life of Dolly,” n.d.). Many religions and societies view artificial human cloning as unethical and against the nature. Some fear that human clones might be enslaved and used for exploitative purposes, while others find human cloning diminishing and belittling to individuality (“Pros and Cons of Human Cloning,” 2016). Lewis Thomas (1974) strongly states, “The cloning of humans is on most of the lists of things to worry about from Science, along with behaviour control, genetic engineering, transplanted heads, computer poetry, and unrestrained growth of plastic flowers.” (p.67). Nevertheless, human cloning is not as insane and ridiculous as depicted by the popular culture, religions, and the society. In fact, research on human cloning should be a priority for it aids the process of human evolution, encourages advances in reproductive technology, and gives people the opportunity to have or rebuild a family. Firstly, human cloning can boost the process of human evolution by creating, preserving good genes, and eliminate bad genes. Evolution is a process in which species gradually change in characteristics over time. Individuals with characteristics that helps them adapt to the
There have been recent studies on animals where the scientist cloned the animals. Cloning is something many people are split on. Some say it is bad some say it is good. I think cloning is a bad thing. Cloning can be a bad thing in many ways. I will be covering some of those ways in this paper.
Recently the world has turned its attention to a new development in science, cloning. Cloning is defined as “the process of producing a clone” (Dictionary.com). This has become a big deal because the endless ways we can bring back extinct creatures. Such as, the extinct wooly mammoth, the Tasmanian tiger, and Quagga. With the endless ability to bring back animal from the past with DNA there comes a problem. With human DNA made available so easily science has come to the idea and process of making designer babies. A designer baby is a baby whose genetic makeup has been selected in order to eradicate a particular defect, or to ensure that a particular gene is present. A family gene might be a bad disease which a baby might get when born. Before this, cloning a baby was science fiction idea to people. It was never imagined or even thought possible, but now it is not. Scientist have already started to create ways to clone babies. With this comes the problem of how far should scientist go? This could be both a blessing and a curse.
The topic of cloning has brought much debate in science and also in society. Many
The recovery period after large scale injuries could be shortened. The effects are analyzed in an article that states, “True healing could occur thanks to the cloning of their own cells to help the recovery process” (“Pros and Cons” 5). Basically, the process of cloning healthy cells could be used as an aid in replenishing damage of unhealthy cells. This process, if it were to be actualized, could help recovery progress in anything from pulled muscles to the paralysis of an entire limb. In theory, the same research can be applied in other areas. If this technology is paired with stem cell research, it could result in a method of repairing physical damage. An article that focused on advances in biotechnology stated that “Another use of cloned stem cells could be the growth of replacement tissues in the laboratory” (LaPensee 15). Necrosis, apoptosis, and lymphocyte diapedesis all cause tissue damage or death. These tissues could be replaced by cloned cells of healthy tissues. This shortens recovery periods and leads to healthier tissue growth.
There are many arguments against cloning. Leon R. Kass bases his argument on repugnance in his article The Wisdom of Repugnance. He is a well-known physician, educator and scientist. Kass perceives cloning as offensive, grotesque revolting, repulsive and wrong. To establish his argument he states, “Most people recoil from the prospect of mass production or human being, with large clones of look-alikes, compromised in their individuality.”1 His rationale is cloning is unnatural, because it is asexual and requires only one parent. Kass believes that cloning turns natural procreation into a manufactured process, which is not natural or moral. In his essay he also points out that cloning will also change the way we see ourselves through our
Cloning is “the creation of exact copies of a gene, cell, or entire organism” (“Cloning”). Many objects can be cloned such as plants and cells. The topic of cloning becomes controversial when the focus is toward humans. It is evident that cloning of other species and organisms is possible. Because of this, the thought of human cloning has arisen in the science community within the previous few centuries. According to a poll produced by Time Magazine, ninety-three percent of American’s are opposed to human cloning (“Human Cloning”). This proves that the advancement of this topic has developed far beyond our wisdom. If nearly one hundred percent of the population disagrees with even the idea of this experiment, it is evident that they are unaware of the ways in which this technology has advanced. Furthermore, this unpredictable outcome of cloning will be irreversible. “Whatever effects cloning might have, cloning would be like opening Pandora’s Box, because there would be no way to turn back once the technology was developed and in use” (“Human Cloning”). As has been noted, the science of human cloning is not yet understood therefore it has advanced far too quickly for society to
For starters, cloning has said to solve the continuous problem of infertility by inserting a clone embryo into the woman’s body. This guarantees infertile couples a child, as opposed to wasting time and money on other painful and emotional procedures that don’t offer this guarantee. The next benefit offers an immense amount of growth in regenerative medicine and assists those with physical disabilities by producing clones of themselves. Why clone themselves if they have a disability? Scientists can use cells from the embryo to customize the regeneration of the new organ, tissue, or body part. As far as cloning an organ goes, this benefits the millions of people who acquired a disease with no cure. For example, diseases such as Alzheimer’s,
. Cloning could prove helpful in the research of genetics. Using cloning technologies, genetic researchers would have a better understanding of genes. Researchers could gain the ability to alter genetics in order to clone humans and
Genetic cloning is one of the most controversial topics of all time. People, specifically scientists, are constantly searching for ways to improve the quality of human life. As a result, they began genetically engineering animals and are currently in search of a method to genetically engineer humans as well; which is called human cloning. There are many reasons why people should not go forward with this step since genetic cloning, consequently human cloning, does not respect nature nor does it ensure diversity and survival in natural ecosystems. In addition, genetic cloning is a cruel, harsh, and an unsafe experiment.
Human cloning is capable of aiding doctors and medical researchers in creating new medical treatments and therapies, which is also
All organisms on this planet evolved from a single cell. That single cell eventually developed into complex organisms with a billion cells. Insects, birds, apes, and the person that sits next to you on the bus every morning, are all very closely related… to you, but what makes a human distinctive from all the other organisms on this planet? Humans are unique in their own way because they have evolved to perform extraordinary and assorted tasks. Humans are meant to have flaws, and they are meant to be diverse, but a relatively new advancement contradicts the definition of being human. For many years the world has had to deal with a controversial topic of cloning. Cloning is an exact, precise copy of an organism (“Cloning”). Even though cloning provides many benefits, human cloning is not ethical because it will cost a tremendous amount of money and time. Cloning will also destroy evolution, and finally each and every human, even a clone, deserves a sense of individuality.
Clones have been in history books for ages and they were always questioned, they have been though up of for many different reasons. These reasons are from making an amusement park to helping with medical issues. The problem lie with should it be done for any reason some people would say there is no problem and should continue while others think that there is a problem and should be ceased. Scientists have endeavored to figure cloning out, all for a good cause although ethically it should be stopped for a multitude reasons. It could diminish the value of people and other living creatures that have survived the mundane way, it also costs more than it should for the physical amount that emerges from it, additionally the fact that it could threaten the lives of an abundance of humans and other animals.
Scientific experimentation has led us to many great discoveries such as: Chemotherapy, heart surgery, and bone marrow transplants. Recently scientists have discovered a new way to heal humans. This is known as cloning. Although they have yet to clone a human they have cloned sheep. Cloning has brought up a huge controversy among the American people. There are two sides to the story. Either you agree with cloning or you don’t. The only way to help make that decision is to look at the good and bad points of cloning.
injecting them in other parts of the body would be one done to blind patient from Baltimore. In February of 2016, Vanna Belton had her own adult stem cells injected into her retina, and it resulted in her regaining her vision (Crew 1). So, although stem cells have a negative view associated with them, the advancements in medicine has allowed for amazing accomplishments in stem cell research already.
Biotechnology is defined as the application of technologies involving the use of living organisms for the development of products that benefit humans (Brooker, 2015). Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) also referred to as transgenic, are organisms that have received genetic material through recombinant DNA technology ( Brooker, 2015). The many benefits from transgenic organisms cannot be overemphasizes. Recombinant bacteria that make human insulin, livestock that produce human proteins in their milk, biological control of plant diseases, bioremediation Cleanup of environmental pollutants such as petroleum hydrocarbons and synthetics that are difficult to degrade are some of the examples. Biotechnology has also been useful in agriculture and has produced many transgenic plants that have traits that are useful to humans; such includes herbicide and pesticide resistance plants (Brooker, 2015).Nevertheless, many countries have laws and regulations that govern biotechnology. Such regulations impede the progress of science research especially, on commercialization of recombinant strains. In spite of such vigorous regulations, in 1982, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the sale of the first genetically engineered human insulin (Brooker, 2015).