Pros And Cons Of Informed Consent In The Medical Process

In their article, “The Concept of Informed Consent,” Faden and Beauchamp give two varying definitions of informed consent, namely sense one and sense two. Sense one is defined as autonomous authorization, meaning that the patient or subject agrees and then gives authority to move forward with a proposal (Vaughn 191). The authors give four conditions that have to be met for informed consent to be recognized: the patient has to understand the information presented to her, there should be no manipulation or coercion, and she has to intentionally give her authorization (Vaughn 191). Faden and Beauchamp also note that the fourth condition, where the patient gives her authorization, is pivotal in this sense since it differentiates autonomous authorization

Informed consent is the basis for all legal and moral aspects of a patient’s autonomy. Implied consent is when you and your physician interact in which the consent is assumed, such as in a physical exam by your doctor. Written consent is a more extensive form in which it mostly applies when there is testing or experiments involved over a period of time. The long process is making sure the patient properly understands the risk and benefits that could possible happen during and after the treatment. As a physician, he must respect the patient’s autonomy. For a patient to be an autonomous agent, he must have legitimate moral values. The patient has all the rights to his medical health and conditions that arise. When considering informed

Another issue with the implementation of Informed consent arises when the patient waives the right to Informed consent and leaves the right to make the decision on the physician. Though legally correct, this can cause psychological stress for the physician especially when the decision is about a life threatening medical condition. Moreover, this also makes the patient vulnerable to abuse. (Manthous, DeGirolamo, 2003)

Every patient has a right to decide on their own course of treatment and freely consent to that treatment. In order to make an educated decision they must be provided with the proper information to make an informed choice (Opinion 8.08 - Informed Consent, 2006). It is the physician’s legal and ethical obligation to provide this information when making their recommendation on treatment. The choices given must be in accordance with good medical practice (Opinion 8.08 - Informed Consent, 2006). The informed consent is the legal policy, either written or verbal, that gives full disclosure of all the information including potential risks that is applicable to the patient’s condition and treatment being offered (Kazmier, 2008).

Obtaining an informed consent is a vital part of current health care. This document lists out several key pieces of information for both the patient, Provider, and the ancillary staff that also access the document during the procedure process. However, obtaining informed consent has not always been the practice norm and in research, informed consent carries different specifications.

However, Franklins claims that consent form should be the responsibility of just the doctor is flawed. Although doctors should not “act as if informed consent is a piece of paper with somebody’s name on it” it should not be only the doctor that is trying to be informed about the process Debroah (261). Franklin does not consider that the doctors already have a great number of patients they have to see. In addition to their job of keeping you healthy they have to check to see and if their patient is a poor reader, and if they understand the text and seeing that not all adults read at the same

It is best demonstrated when patients signs for proposed treatment once they feel fully informed and completely understand what a treatment or procedure entails. The idea of informed consent is based on the principle of autonomy and respect of self-determination. In this paper I am going to present different perspectives of informed consent by different institutions that why it is important to treatment procedure.

Delivery of excellent healthcare involves a multitude of dynamics including an extremely straightforward requirement of a patient’s permission for treatment or procedure. Informed consent, a patient’s authorization, consist of communiqué between healthcare provider or physician and the healthcare consumer, providing sufficient information allowing the patient to make a knowledgeable decision regarding healthcare treatment

Informed Consent allows a doctor to render treatment to a patient. By signing the document states that the patient understands the circumstances and what is required. This paper is to analyze the consent and non-consent, and ethical issues that can become a problem.

Do patients read the Informed consent form?Ethics in Healthcare require patients to sign an informed consent. Many patients do not read the informed consent because they assume to know what awaits them, for instance, a patient waiting to go for operation bothers not to read because they will still go for the operation. The assumptions by health care providers that all know to read also make patients sign without knowing what is in the document while others do not understand the terms used. Finally, patients do not read this forms, especially during emergency situations since they do not have enough time to seek for the second opinion or go through the entire document.The Cordasco, (2013) notion that “an informed consent verifies that the provider

Consent in the health care circles is a where a health care professional explains to the patient their current medical condition, provides the available recommended treatment for the problem and the risks involved and then the patient signs the form indicating his or her consent for the procedure. However consent to a medical procedure is not enough, consent must be informed whereby the health care professional fully discloses the facts behind the medical intervention to the patient. Patients normally encounter the informed consent when they need a surgical or medical intervention. However, informed consent has less to do with the patient signing the form. The signed form is used as documentation for keeping record but it’s not informed

Consent can be quite tricky, a legal minefield for healthcare teams, this is due to the patients who will give or refuse to give private information about themselves who is legally competent but

For a patient to make his decision he/she must able to read the consent and understand it before making any decision. The great thing about the consent form are that they are written

Informed consent is the basis for all legal and moral aspects of a patient’s autonomy. Implied consent is when you and your physician interact in which the consent is assumed, such as in a physical exam by your doctor. Written consent is a more extensive form in which it mostly applies when there is testing or experiments involved over a period of time. The long process is making sure the patient properly understands the risk and benefits that could possible happen during and after the treatment. As a physician, he must respect the patient’s autonomy. For a patient to be an autonomous agent, he must have legitimate moral values. The patient has all the rights to his medical health and conditions that arise. When considering

“Respect for human beings involves giving due scope to peoples capacity to make their own decisions. In the research context, this normally requires that participation be the result of a choice made by the participants” (NHMR, 2007, p.3).  Freegard 2012 (p.60), states that “respecting the rights of others,” includes a responsibility for Health professionals “to let others know about their rights” and that this forms the basis of an informed consent.