Prostitution rarely ever seems to be a talking point among World War I historians. Many under the impression that discussion about such topics regarding life behind the front detracts from what happened during combat. However, this interpretation of history is rather unsettling since it silences a tremendous portion of WWI from readers who wish to understand more about its impacts on the life of soldiers and society. Wars are fought by people, therefore, they should be written about as such, rather than simply cannon fodder or a statistic for a particular battle. When we see a person, rather than a number, the impact of historical events hold much larger significance to us than they previously did before. Now, prostitution may not necessarily …show more content…
By pressure from the military leaders, they felt they had no other choice but to help protect the men who did visit sanctioned brothels. Venereal diseases, when contracted, rendered a soldier useless. He would no longer be able to perform in battle, and at the rate men were dying on the Western Front, the British Army needed as many bodies as possible to fight such a massive, costly war. Uneffective in lower the rates of venereal disease, the British government decided to pass Regulation 40d in 1918 which placed all French brothels out of bounds from the BEF and Dominion troops. Reasoning that by preventing troops from entering such establishment the issue would be resolved, however, it may have only achieved in increasing ameature prostitution, which was far more dangerous than the regulated brothels that were controlled by the …show more content…
Prostitution and venereal diseases created an identity crisis among the people of England, and even more so among those of the BEF. However, it is the origination of such crisis which historians begin to disagree upon. Until recently this aspect of war was a taboo subject that few were willing to tackle, but the few that do can be divided in to three categories: Those who focus solely on the men visiting the brothels, the women who serviced the soldiers, and more interestingly, the effects of dominion soldiers on the BEF’s masculinity. While nearly all mention the other sides perspective, they attribute more attention to one particular side either because they believe it to be more pressing or simply to be an interesting area of study. The perspective which historians narrow their lens through also reveals who or what they attribute to the crisis in masculinity among British soldiers. The first category focuses mainly on the perspective of women and how the war and prostitution affected both their own identity and the identity of the BEF as they began
Claire E. Sterk, the author of the article of “Fieldwork on Prostitution in the Era of Aids”
By reading both “All Quiet on the Western Front” and “Testament of Youth”, we learn that World War 1 had a tremendous effect, not only on the men in the trenches; but essentially on everyone; of all genders throughout Europe and the World. Vera Brittains, “Testament of Youth” tells the tale of her experiences working as a V.A.D (Voluntary Aid Detachment Nurse) in many areas, however in chapters five and six, she is stationed in London. She describes, in vivid details the struggles of working as a nurse in London during the war. In Remarques’ novel, “All Quiet on the Western Front” we follow the life of a soldier, Paul Baumer who essentially enlists in the Army and is later deployed to the western front. Baumer experiences the horrors of war in many ways, due to this; he undergoes severe physical and psychological stress and he feels as if he will never be able to recover and become an ordinary civilian.
The role of females (regardless of loyalties) shifted dramatically from household partners to that of logisticians, medical and intelligence. While we are provided the details of camp followers and sutlers which have been part of military life since time immemorial, women took on various roles that were not explicitly conceived of in the
During the Second World War, both married and unmarried women worked in wartime industries and factories to take the place of men who joined the service. Although women didn’t play a significant role on the battlefields in Europe compared to males, it would be logical to conclude that women played an integral role in the participation and victory in WWII both at home and abroad. Yet when one considers their contribution, it is hard to imagine how much more they could have done given the conservative views of gender role at that time. In the context of traditional gender roles and boundaries, women conceivably maximized their wartime efforts by working in a variety of jobs including industry, volunteering, and serving as support staff for
In the years after the Second World War, people created uncountable numbers of historiographical research on various topics related to the war, such as military tactics in battles, individual groups of men during their time in service, and other such subjects. Not much surprise exists then, that women’s actions in World War II eventually would also gain interest and publication for the public, though it did not gain an undivided focus until the advent of women’s and social history grew momentum. Women, despite being half of the world’s population, doubtlessly had acted during the war years, although limited by social gender expectations of the period. As time passes from 1945, more interest in the lives of women and their effect on the war
Berki’s organization design for the book is specifically helpful for the intended audience as it introduces thoroughness and accuracy. She demarcates the multi-faceted viewpoints of war and assigns a chapter to a certain group. This helps understand that the individual differences of women did not play any role in their struggle, but rather what mattered was the inner strength.
With the flow of war, there were several major tendencies that are generally corresponded with women of the time. The most important of them is the changing of roles they had to switch to in order to substitute missing men. While women were previously presented with the
In the bibliography “Breaking Tradition”, by Kathleen Ernst, the author portrays the changing roles of women during the Civil War and World War II in a variety of methods. These include diction, imagery, and historical facts. By using these methods, Ernst is able to effectively support her claim that women’s roles in society had changed during the Civil War and during World War II.
Abel, Gillian, et al. Taking the crime out of sex work: New Zealand sex workers fight for decriminalisation. Policy Press, 2010. Part two: Implementation and impact of the Prostitution Reform Act (2003): the first five years: Review of the PRA
Although men served in battle in World War I, women also had important roles that sometimes were not as praised as men’s. Certain situations in All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich M. Remarque can be seen as unsupportive of feminism, or the belief of equality of the sexes. Historically, women typically served as the hospital orderlies to care for and heal wounded soldiers in war. Surprisingly, mostly men play the role of the orderlies in All Quiet on the Western Front are men rather than women to do important jobs such as grabbing “[the bodies] as soon as [they] are dead”(Remarque 16). With the men attaining the role of orderlies as opposed to the women, the story is not necessarily in support of the feminist idea of equality between the
During the course of both the World Wars, women had proven themselves to be worthy of the ‘elite’ group; men, of that time period. They had done this by commencing a sequence of work that needed to be carried out while the men were absent. However, some may argue that the women merely replaced the men and did nothing more but others believe that they had done even more than what was required of them as well as replacing them. The series of sources are propagated puzzles which have been aired recently and in this essay I will slowly depict the literal and further meaning of each one, fully describing if the women did simply just replace men or, exceed their requirements.
“As a group, women soldiers never told their own stories, so we went looking for the contemporaries who told their stories for them. In the course of looking for women soldiers, we encountered a variety of other women at the war front or disguised as men... While these women have fascinating stories of their own, they are not included here. Our work focuses solely on women soldiers regularly enlisted or commissioned in the army.” (2) Included in the chapters are the history of women in battle, their means of disguising themselves, and their motivation for becoming soldiers.
When the First World War began in 1914, there was much discussion regarding the proper gender roles for British men and women. For men, the course of action seemed clear that they should enlist and fight. Yet, many men struggled under the pressure of warfare. For women, it was unclear how they should be involved in the war effort. Many men wanted the women to keep their traditional gender roles of taking care of the household. However, the lack of male workers on the home front required women to take on different work roles. The women received a great deal of praise and positive attention for their work as nurses, munitions workers, and military auxiliaries. However, men were critical
The outbreak of WWI saw a number of unexpected changes take place within the common social strata. These changes were prompted by the fact that a new wave of social-thinking was taking shape and eventually affected the manner by which the society reflected itself. While men formed political parties, engaged in planning war schemes and creating economic strategies, women also played an essential and significant role during wartime Europe. WWI women can
Before I entered this class, my imagination about what sociology is wasn’t of what it came to be after this class ended. First of all, before coming to this class, I didn’t know that prostitution was a social problem. I understand that being a prostitute is a sin, however I don’t think that a person should be punished by a society for being a prostitute. In other words, I thought that if a person is making money on his or her own body, it wouldn’t be a societal problem. Coming in this class, I have the knowledge that gay, lesbians or any other sexual orientation that isn’t heterosexuality was something that only exists in one’s mind and that if a person want to change their sexual orientation, he or she could. Therefore, in this class, after learning about sexual orientation, I accepted that people are born different and as society we should all accept that. Sexual orientation somehow I feel should require more large-scale intervention. In a lot places, LGBT people are discriminated. If God only created female and a male and that they only should be attracted to each other, let him only judge those whose feelings are different from what the bible states.