Quadrennial Defense Review Paper

Select one of the six “Prevailing challenges that pose the most strategically significant risk” (Strategic risks) found on page 28 of DHS’ 2014 Quadrennial Homeland Security Review. Answer these questions regarding the selected risk: What consequences are faced at the national level if this threat is not adequately addressed? Do you believe this risk is being adequately addressed now? Why or why not?

In August of 2007 Congress mandated the Department of Homeland Security to undertake the Quadrennial Homeland Security Review. This review is submitted to congress and published for public review in the Department of Homeland Security’s website (6 U.S. Code § 347 - Quadrennial homeland security review n.d.). This journal at one point only examined problem issues with the Department of Homeland Security. Since then the Obama administration has incorporated different aspects of the journal to include plans for “maturing and strengthening the homeland security enterprise.” (Bullock, 2016, p. 14). Just to add, the most recent Quadrennial Homeland Security Review from 2014, is not just about

Gagnon, M., & Stephens, M. B. (2015). Obesity and National Defense: Will America Be Too

Cohen understood that the United States were vulnerable and something needed to be done. He utilized these terrorist acts as an opportunity and the platform to make a moving statement.. “As the new millennium approaches,” Cohen wrote to Congress, “the United States faces a heightened prospect that regional aggressors, third-rate armies, terrorist cells, and even religious cults will wield disproportionate power by using—or even threatening to use—nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons against our troops in the field and our people at home.” He created the 1997 Defense Reform Initiative, which led to the consolidation of several agencies. Those agencies included the Special Weapons Agency, the Chemical Biological Defense Program and the On-Site Inspection Agency. These three agencies combined would later form the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. He challenged senior defense officials and commanders of the military branches to reevaluate their strategies in order to improve our preparedness. Mr. Cohen was a pivotal reason behind the creation of the Defense Threat Reduction

Taking away nuclear deterrence from the argument, it is the conventional forces that provide the U.S. military to protect the homeland, deter aggression, and project power abroad – the direct aims of the 2014 QDR and 2012 Defense Strategic Guidance. Legitimate deterrence requires credible capability. The 2014 QDR seeks to reset the military, not to whitewash the past decade or the likelihood of continued irregular conflict, but rather to reset and reinvest the conventional capabilities for conflict with a peer competitor. To do so requires

General Clapper, the United States Director of National Intelligence, recently briefed the Senate Armed Services Committee on the worldwide threat assessment. His brief addressed the implications of technology on national security, and characteristics of the nation’s leading threat actors that include China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, as well as non-state actors. The entirety of the briefing demonstrates that the United States will face numerous increasingly complex national security challenges into the foreseeable future.

“A hill is another chance to climb.” Failure effects everyone on Earth. The difference is that everyone responds to said failures in different ways. Since I was young, I faced roadblocks. The way I faced these failures are what defines me. Even though it is difficult, I try to learn something from each of them. A failure that truly taught me a valuable lesson was the end of my senior football season. The events and lessons that I took away from this failure will help guide me for the rest of my life.

The Department of Defense (DoD) is America 's oldest and largest government agency, with military traces dating way back to pre-Revolutionary times. The Department of Defense has since grown and evolved with the nation, hence becoming the national’s largest employer with over 1.4 million active duty soldiers, 1.1 million National Guard and Reserve forces, and 718,000 civilian personnel. With such a huge organization does come with a huge network, and security infrastructure network, and the burden to protect the information transferred or stored on that network. This means information is a strategic asset to the Department of Defense; it’s therefor the goal of this security policy to provide guidelines of implementing

Is it important to know the past? Why or why not? Well first of all what is the past? That’s a question asked by all… the past is something that has not only already happened, but created what we have now. Without many of things that happened in the past where would we be right now? Would we ever know? Well, obviously not because the past did happen and the present is now occurring. Our past shouldn’t be kept a secret. What we are living in right now will soon be known as another name such as the “past”. The past is reality. Even if it may seem a little scary it did happen and there's no fact that it didn’t. So may I say that even if you don’t think there's anyone to help you understand the past because it was a long time ago.. trust me

The use of air warfare against enemy troops and other aircraft may cause harm to our soldier and the United States itself. The use of the United State Air Force are coming out with new technology to have a better chance with finding the enemy and putting them out of business.Why should the US keep the Air Force and not just leave it to the Navy or the Army to use.Since they are there own branch they have be making some much new technology that we are one of the best Air Force in the world.

I stated earlier in my paper that the use of ground forces is essentially obsolete in 2017, and the United States should make it a greater priority to utilize other resources to engage in combat. With my predictions of what the United States national defense policy will be like based on what I have learned from experts in the field, ground forces will be a thing of the past. When we were asked what Harvard professor Nathan Tarcov would do in confronting ISIS, I said the exact same thing. Tarcov would recommend to the current administration to not send significant ground forces. There is no clear principle of action for the United States military in confronting ISIS, much less the war on terror as a whole. No matter how many insurgents you take

Having females as combat engineers is a great idea, but there will be some problems for some leaders. Some leaders have only worked with male soldiers and trying to be able to get used and adapt to have a female in their ranks will be a challenge for them. Another issue that can take places is an EO/SHAP complaint. I believe that combat engineers’ being open to females is a great idea. Over time it has shown that some females have the physical demand as male soldiers do. There have been females that have graduated from sapper school that show that some females are more physical fitter than some males. Also having females as combat engineers can help you to build your professionalism. Some leaders will have issue with females in their ranks

Threats The defense budget of the United States has been declining. Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has revised its military strategies. The Soviet Union's dissolution in 1991 rendered

Therefore, it is important to reform current organizational deficiencies which hinder current cyber-warfare efforts, adopt a new doctrine relevant to the new threat, and make cyber-warfare one of the United States Government’s top national security priorities.

The branches of the military, for a couple generations, have always been the Army, Navy, Air force, Marine Corps, and the Coast Guard; however, in an ever evolving digital world, the notion that outer space would be the next military front is being rapidly replaced by the idea that cyber space will be the next arms race. The United States has been defending attacks on their infrastructure day after day, night after night, when one hacker on one side of the world sleeps, another takes their place to attempt to compromise the US government. The motives may range from a political ‘hacktivist’ trying to prove a point, to an economic spy, trying to gain a competitive edge on its more upstart rivals, to an attempt to control the United States