preview

Race Segregation And Anti-Discrimination Case Study

Decent Essays

McDonnell Douglas third step requires the offended party to present proof to make a honest to goodness issue of material certainty that (1) the respondent's expressed reasons had no premise truth be told, (2) the expressed reasons were not the real reasons, or (3) the expressed reasons were inadequate to clarify the respondent's activities (Melvin, 2015). However, Aquino attempted to meet his weight by endeavoring to ruin Honda's expressed reason through insinuation and level dissent. Aquino tried to prove his innocence but there were no facts that showed he was not the one who had to vandalize Honda because he was fired he would be the one that would have a reason to do this knowing he had access to the tools used in vandalizing Honda. Nevertheless, Aquino had to have some form of evidence proving Honda intented to cover up a discriminatory motive or action. …show more content…

Additionally, contemporary cases of race segregation including affirmations that are not "immediate" and subject to differing understandings in light of history, tone, an intonation of voice, and land conditions, for instance, must be analyzed in the setting. Members of the jury ought to be given the chance to contextualize certainties, and judges ought not to dispose of this jury work

Get Access