The second episode, which brings a change in Odysseus, takes place on Helios` island. As I previously mentioned his unwillingness to tell a simple lie cost him the life of all his crewmembers and delayed his homecoming by another seven years. Granted, he saved himself but a meek lie would also have saved him nonetheless. He had plenty of time to reflect on this action. Consequently, I feel that Odysseus learned that the safety of his fellow companions would have taken precedence over telling a simple lie, even in regards to virtue. As a result, Odysseus` eagerness to lie to others blooms fully as he realizes that lies are not acts in themselves, but rather they are tools to protect or harm those they are directed towards. Thus, with this seemingly small change, Odysseus turns into one of the biggest liars, not with the intention to swindle others to get his way but to fulfill the virtues that he feels are important.
Finally, it is possible to analyze the other seemingly vile act: the ruthless killing of all the suitors who were trying to court Penelope. He fells all the suitors with the aid of Athena and consent from Zeus. The participation of the gods indicates that this too is a virtuous task. We have to, however, try to see how Odysseus interpreted these acts during his combat. One way of looking at it is that, in addition to protecting Telemachus and his home, it was for glory. Yet the trip to Hades has changed him. Such glories hold lesser significance to Odysseus,
In the latter, however, some of his more ignoble traits are revealed: he is a braggart, he almost dishonorably uses poisoned arrows, and he shows conceit in his victory over the Cyclops. It is sometimes difficult to reconcile this man with the one who willingly gives up eternal life for the moral condition and the chance to return to his wife. Largely, the problems with understanding the moral position of Odysseus stem from his immense experience and cleverness, which make him at once mortal and fantastic.
Odysseus has no reason to save his men’s lives but for his own convenience. Finally, Odysseus is home and after a long journey in which he shows no heroic actions and yet proves to be nothing but a villain, he once again proves throughout his actions that he is a villain. Odysseus is finally home, on Ithaca, and is then helped by Athena and disguises himself as an old beggar. He proves then to be a villain by seeking his revenge for the suitors and maidservants that once betray him (696, summary). Another way in which Odysseus shows he is a villain is when he finally reunites with his wife Penelope and reacts with rage when she tests him. This reveals Odysseus is a villain because he reacts as if he was innocent and some way being betrayed by his own wife. Of course, though, he never tells his loyal wife Penelope about his love affairs with Calypso and Circe. In conclusion, Odysseus throughout his actions proves to be not only veil but a villain. He leads his men into trouble, kills the suitors and maidservants without mercy, and betrays loyal wife. This allows readers to truly see Odysseus other side. He was a villain and there is no doubt about it. However, think about his so called heroic actions and the way he made everything work out for his own benefits. He knew he was a villain and somehow still got away with
The narration of this chapter is full of powerful words describing him as the master of craft and battle, which is very similar to the way his legacy would describe him. At one point he calls upon the God Apollo to give him glory. This is very interesting because he is the God of archery, and his arrows are a metaphor for death and misery. Odysseus is brimming with pride, and vengeance, and seems to have forgotten his lessons, because these are the vices that brought him and his men misery during their time at sea. The targets that he speaks of, is of course the suitors he aims to kill, but as well it is the reclaiming of his power, his kingdom, his wife, or in other words his life.
Whether Odysseus is exaggerating a certain scene or characteristic of himself as to come off more strong and hero-like, or Odysseus is leaving out information that adds to the understanding of the story, the story that is told and how it is perceived by the audience depends on and is directly correlated to the situation Odysseus or another character is currently in, who his audience is, and what is it that he wants from the audience. For instance, when telling his story to the Phaecians, Craig Russell claims that “Odysseus’s concern would have been not what “really happened” in the past, but rather what is most beneficial in his present”. Odysseus was focusing on evoking certain emotions and impactful pathos upon his audience in this situation, so that the Phaecian’s might have sympathy for him, feel in awe of him and trust him. Therefore, Odysseus uses storytelling based on the situation
First, one of the recurring themes in the Odyssey is that of cunningness over strength. Although Odysseus was known to be a strong and powerful of individual, his cunning was his strongest asset when it came to overcoming the obstacles in his travels. Instead of relying solely on his strength, he relies on his minds ability to deceive and manipulate individuals to do as he pleases. An example of this is seen when Odysseus with the help of Athena disguises himself as an old beggar. Instead of simply going to his home
I think that Odysseus' actions were justified because of the actions of the wooers. Without any conformation of him being dead, they first tried to woo his wife. That is very disrespectful and angered Odysseus greatly. Also, the suitors show no respect for his house and belongings. They overtake his house without even thinking about the man of the house, which is disrespectful.
Odysseus was not justified in his actions. Even though the wooers might have deserved being killed, because of how disrespectful they were to Penelope and Telemachus. They were even disrespectful to Odysseus as well, trying to steal his country from him wasn't the smartest idea. All those hateful things the wooers said still does not make killing them okay. Violence is never the answer for anything.
Odysseus believed he was in the right when killing the suitors “You dogs! You never imagined I'd return from Troy- so cocksure that you bled my house to death, ravished my serving-women- wooed my wife behind my back while I was still alive!” (Homer 22: 37-40). Odysseus was dead set on killing the suitors since the beginning. He even told them “. . . all your necks are in the noose-your doom is sealed” (22: 43), illustrating how he would kill them as to avenge his wife and his honor. In doing so he was perceived as a hero by the most prevalent male figures in Ithaca, displaying an excellent example of Kleos, “fame through having great honor and virtue. Earned pride.”
First off, Oedipus and his family had really rough times. Oedipus’ sons killed each other for the throne, his daughter killed herself, he killed himself, so it was a very weird family. To start off, Eteocles Oedipus’ son he was heroic because he saved his family and country from the enemies who tried to kill the people of Thebes. Eteocles of course saves them from the ruthless and ferocious Argive army. “Against our seven gates in a yawning ring the famished spears came onward in the night; but before his jaws were sated with our blood, or pine fire took the garland of our towers, he was thrown back, and as he turned, great Thebes no tender victim for his noisy power rose like a dragon behind him, shouting war.” This shows that the priest and chorus were talking about the war and how Thebes won at the end of the battle and Eteocles died with honor fighting for his country men and family. He was brave because he went into war against his own brother and he was not afraid that in the end of the battle he would probably kill his brother. “For God hates utterly The bray of bragging tongues; and when he beheld their
In the time of the so-called Heroic Age (roughly the Mycenaean Age, the time of the Trojan War, 1200-1100 BCE or thereabouts) standards were much, much different, and some of them, at least, for very good reasons. Probably by those standards (or the standards of Homer’s time, some 400 years later) Odysseus was considerably closer to a hero than he would be in our eyes today. Perhaps, what might now be seen as grotesquely excessive blood letting, would then have been seen as an understandable or even necessary act of retribution
When Odysseus returned home to his wife and son, he took a very brutal approach to rid his home of the suitors who had invaded his household. This revenge was also taken out upon the servants and maids who had been unfaithful to Penelope and had slept with the suitors. Some may say this punishment was too harsh, and made Odysseus less than an honorable man. However, Odysseus’s actions were justifiable.
During his journey Odysseus used what he has learned from is mistakes to return home and kill the suitors of his wife. On the island of Cicones,and with his encounter with Polyphemus, Odysseus learned that bragging can bring great misfortune. On Ithaca Odysseus never brags to the suitors and is able to enter his house with the Antinous and the other suitors knowing his real identity. He takes the punishment of Antinous and the other suitors without saying a word and is able to see those who have invaded his house. Odysseus is able to see who is loyal and who is not and take his revenge with the suitors never knowing who
. When Epictetus says that we should get angry if there is someone splashing in the bathhouse, he means that we should get upset at the way things are going. He would say that getting splashed at the bathhouse was out of your control. That no matter what the splashing would have happened, because it was already set up to happen that way, and there is no other way that it could have happened. The point that he is trying to make is that things in life are out of our control. They happen because there causes r set up to make it happen in that way. That there was no other way that things could have turned out. Epictetus thinks that if we learn to accept that these things were destine to happen and that they are out of our control, that we will
Explanation: Perhaps as they are walking out of Jerusalem, perhaps before they had left the place where they were celebrating the Passover, Jesus began explaining disciples that he was the true vine, and his father was the vinedresser. He said that every branch that did not bear fruit the Father would take away, but every branch that did bear fruit he would prune so it would bear more fruit. Jesus told them that they were clean through what he had told them, and that if they abided in him, he would abide likewise in them. As a branch cannot bear fruit unless it is still attached to the vine, so they could not bear fruit unless they would abide in him. Christ then reiterated his previous statement: he was the vine, and they the branches. If they would abide in him, they would bear much fruit; but if they did not, they could do nothing. Then he elaborated: if anyone did not abide in him, and therefore bore no fruit, he would be cut off and thrown into the fire, and he would wither and die. If they would abide in him, and his words abide in them, they would be able to ask anything of him, and it would be granted. And the Father is glorified when the branches bear much fruit, which is a sign and seal of true discipleship. As the Father loved the Son, so the Son loved his disciples. If the disciples therefore would keep his commandments, they would abide in his love, in the same way as Christ kept his Father’s commandments and abides in his love. And Jesus was saying those things
This is not how he wanted to find out. This was something no one would wish on their worst enemy.