A THOUGHT PAPER ON MY UNDERSTANDING AND REFLECTION OF THE BIBLICAL FRAMEWORK FOR CONTEXTUAL THEOLOGY BASED ON THE FIRST WEEK’S LEARNING
1. INTRODUCTION
Our contextual theology should have biblical/theological grounding if it is to be a true Christian theology. The foundation where we lay our theology, therefore, has great significance in our theology. For example, if our theology is build on the ancient Greek philosophy which rises in the 6th Century BC, and which continues throughout the Hellenistic period, and then it is possible that it will influence our reflection and articulation in terms of ontology, metaphysics, logic, ethics, aesthetics and so on even when we approach the Bible or theology. Enlightenment Theology which is built on the secular philosophy is one such evidence where at the centre of their theology seems solely personal reasoning with no reference to the Bible. As
…show more content…
CONCLUSION
It is imperative to take all the three pillars–creation, incarnation and eschatology together as an integrated biblical foundation for constructing contextual theology. Taking one separate will create an incomplete or one-sided theology. I believe there will be error if our theology starts and orients with creation alone. There will perhaps be a tendency where much stress will be given to creation, which would lead to much focus on general revelation. General revelation, I believe, is helpful only when it leads people to the specific revelation, Jesus Christ or in Bediako’s words a pedagogue that leads to Christ.
Theology that starts with or whose orientation is only on incarnation or redemption will probably have tendencies to disregard the context and so culture. We might feel the need to discard all the cultural practices as demonic and change with a new Christian culture through Christ. The task of contextual theology should be that it will enhance the good in culture without discarding them, and attempt to right the wrong until they reach perfection at the
1) Inspired revelation – the source of authority and the direction for our life and ministry is found in the Scriptures. The bible is the foundational tool of theology in addition to being its source.
Theology of Christianity appears in many forms. It is a concentration of the study of both the old and new testaments, as well as Christian traditions. Such theologies discussed by the author are: biblical criticism, systematic theology, historical theology, moral theology, pastoral theology, liberation theology, natural theology, liturgical studies and sacramenta theology, and mystical
A contextualist would see that the purpose was not to teach science, but to reveal the relationship between God and the creation of the world including man (Ralph, 2001). In the bible, human experiences with God are a two-thousand-year reflection process where, over time, whole truths were converted to partial truths as the human race evolved (Ralph, 2001). If read from a fundamentalist view the bible would be full of contradictions and the reader would miss revelations or conclude towards less developed ones (Ralph, 2001). The creation story provides an origin for man as seen in the Babylonian’s Enuma Elish version the world was a result of a war between gods (Ralph, 2001). The world and man was created from the remains of a defeated and rebellious god, using her defective body for the material to create it (Ralph, 2001). In this view humans were created to be slaves to the gods, used as commodities with no value; creating a viewpoint that down to the roots human beings were
In “Scripture: Nourished by the Word (Catholic Basics: A Pastoral Ministry Series)” Ralph (2001) emphasises the importance of a contextualist approach when reading scripture. Firstly, this essay will discuss Ralph’s statement and outline the difference between a fundamental and contextual approach towards reading the Bible. Secondly, these different approaches will be demonstrated on three different examples: the Genesis’ creation accounts, the stories of miracles in the Gospel writings, and Jesus’ words towards his mother Mary just before his crucifixion. Finally, a conclusion is drawn on how a contextualist approach assists in gaining a better understanding of God.
As Christians we often believe certain things simply because it’s what our parents and the people around us believe. We often go about our Christian walk without ever giving thought or reason to why we believe what we do. The world of Christian Theology is a place where Christians can find answer to the ‘what and why’ of Christianity. If we are able to begin comprehending Christian Theology and the rudimental knowledge of it, then we can take it with us into more in depth books and discussions about theology, know the importance of it and how vital it is for Christians
Theology is about finding answers to questions people seek. When one inherits religious traditions, this tends to mean they inherit other people’s answers to their own questions. People
The creation account is so significant to the Christian worldview because it shows you how we became about.
The immediate task at hand is to provide a theological framework that encompasses the scope of the Apostle Paul and his
Second, we see the culture and how it can be effected both by our sin and by Christian living. Romans, 1: 21-23 puts on display a culture who has forsaken him for the sake of living in their own sin, “For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged
Firstly, scripture has an essential role in the revelation of the doctrine of God, as it is an important part of one of the two methods by which he reveals himself to us, these two methods are general and special revelation. To begin, general revelation is the way in which God evokes his work and light in the nature of man, so that we may acknowledge his worth, as well as the beauty of his traits. This innate trait to recognize the beauty and order of nature is prearranged, so that no man can be excused for an ignorance of the Lord and his existence. In the word of God, it is affirmed, “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse” (Romans 1:20). We are told that God has intentionally left a mark on us and the world, leaving a signature on all of his creations, so that we persistently ask questions about our creator and his plausible existence. The Lord deliberately created such a divine and natural order of the world,
If the burden of authorship were laid on man, it would like the foresight of God for the future. Because God divinely authored the Bible, he can also use it to speak to us today despite the difference in culture from the date of its authorship to now. That does not mean that we can just find any meaning we want and assume that God planted it there, it is still our responsibility to ensure that we are using proper study habits to decipher the word. One of the biggest issues I see today is that we have a habit of taking scripture out of context reading only the portion of the verse that supports our thoughts or not taking into consideration the context of who the scripture was directed towards or the culture of that time. During the reading in this week’s session, there were two things that stood out to me. McGrath notes in the Christian Theology Reader that under Hodge’s view “Biblical Authority is specifically linked with the correct Biblical interpretation” (McGrath, 2011, p. 111) and that the Bible is “absolutely infallible when interpreted in the same sense intended, and hence are clothed with absolute divine authority” (McGrath, 2011, p.
As Genesis is the first book of the bible and verses 1:1-2:3 are the first accounts, it is essential that the story that proceeds be examined. What is then discovered is another account about creation. This creation story is similar to the first account but it can be seen that God ‘is not working to a pre-planned strategy’ , this then ‘hints at a measure of vulnerability in the Creator’ in the second creation account which is a stark difference to the first story of creation where God is viewed as ‘is a king who does all things well: in his own judgement, it is 'very good'. He alone is responsible for creation: his voice alone is heard; he consults no one for wisdom or advice’ . Incorporating the world behind the text and the world of the text we are able to get a more cohesive experience about what the story is telling us, in this case what Genesis 1:1-2:3 is actually referring to. The tools used to analyse the text allows the audience to develop greater insight about the purpose of the text, it also allows the audience to change their previous viewpoint with integrated gained depth and
In his classic work Christ and Culture, H. Richard Niebuhr asserts that the relationship between earnest followers of Jesus Christ and human culture has been an "enduring problem."1 How should believers who are "disciplining themselves for the purpose of godliness" (1 Tim. 4:7) relate to a world whose culture is dominated by "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the boastful pride of life" (1 John 2: 16)? Culture is God's gift and task for human beings created in His image and likeness. At creation humanity received a "cultural mandate" from the sovereign Creator to have dominion over the earth and to cultivate and keep it (Gen. 1:26, 28; 2:15). But sin's effects are total, and
All institutions within society facilitate communication, and in that way, they all contribute to the creation, spread, and evolution of culture (Crouch, 2008). When Christians speak of engaging with culture it usually means consuming culture with discernment. We teach one another how to analyze and evaluate culture in its myriad forms. The only way to change culture is to create more of it” (Crouch, 2008, p. 66) This is right and important. We are to be transformed by the renewing of our minds so we are not
The fields of philosophy and theology are often grounds of debate. While some hold these two to be relevant and dependent on each other, others find them to be completely independent of each other. In John D. Caputo’s work, Philosophy and Theology, he expresses his view of these fields as companions. Caputo states, “Think of philosophers and theologians as fellow sailors on [the] ocean,” depicting his view of the interdependence of these two fields (Caputo 69). Through his illustration we can find the influence philosophy and theology can have on each other in facilitating our toleration of such a mysterious future and world.