Regulations of Financial Markets and Global Financial Crisis Essay

The panic of 1907 and the Great Recession of 2007-2009 has both been major economic events in the United States economic history. This paper compares and contrasts these two major events and enables us to understand importance of certain financial institutions and regulations during troubled times in the financial sector. In this paper, both panics of 1907 and 2007 are historically analyzed and compared.

In this essay I will discuss a few terms and how their relationships apply between regulation and market structures, as well as how regulation policies affect the market.

Prior to the financial crisis, the overall responsibility for financial oversight was divided among several different agencies. These agencies and their “varying rules and standards led to certain entities not being regulated at all, with others subject to less oversight than their peer

This necessitated the need for development of regulatory measures for the industry. Bank regulation is a legal structure by which all financial

1. The elimination of potential regulatory gap or overlaps arising from member regulation and market regulation

The government regulation of the financial industry by the Dodd-Frank Act was the most compelling topic of this class. A financial regulatory process was created which limits risk through the enforcement of transparency and accountability. The main objective of the Dodd-Frank Act was to provide regulation to banks that was more stringent. The FSOC was created as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act. The two main objectives of the FSCO was to stop the occurrence of another recession and to resolve persistent issues. The elimination of bailouts funded by taxpayers was another important element of this act. The CFPB also known as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created as a result of the act. The consolidation of consumer protection responsibilities

Regulations such as the Insider Trading Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, and Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) enhance protection and eradicate unethical business practices. Despite the various laws in place to protect individuals, just turn on the news, read the paper, or glance online at the numerous corporate scandals. Enactment of legislation such as SOX and the Dodd-Frank Act endeavored to restore the public’s trust. Do these rules mitigate the risk, or are they burdensome on broker-dealer such as Group Capital? While laws exist to protect consumers, investors, and shareholders, the question remains are they excessive. The sustainability and ramifications of financial regulation receive minimal thought, and the possibility of future crises garners even less consideration. Kaal (2013) indicated a sense of urgency around rule-making, yet it may not allow a full evaluation of the effect on a broker-dealer. Many of these decisions consider the economic, political, and legal costs on society and not the impact on businesses. Regulators need to balance consumer protection without being punitive towards the financial industry. These factors need balance, or they could stifle business

The old saying the fox is going to watch the henhouse is some of it for same problems we run into with regulators regulating themselves. Part of the systemic problem that existed in the late part of the first decade of the 21st century were government entities known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Both of these government institutions would just as responsible as the banks themselves for the crisis that took place and sworn new regulation which may not be far-reaching enough.

Regulatory environment consist of several laws and regulations that has been developed by federal, state, and local governments in order to limit control over business practices. The regulatory environment plays an important role in the positive operation of the financial sector and in the efficient management and integration of capital flow and domestic savings. “The value of the claims of financial institutions on borrowers is dependent upon the

Another key question is why do we have regulation? Regulation is meant to serve the best interest of the public. Regulation can serve the private interest, public interest or both. Almost every aspect of our daily life is regulated (as per Regulation: A Primer, page 1). Regulation is very comprehensive to the point that it extends to the moment we wake up to the moment we go back to bed at night. In the morning, there are regulations that dictate which airwaves are used by your radio station; in addition, food and drug agencies regulate the content of your toothpaste, soap,

Deregulation is believed to be one of the major factors that led to the 2008 Financial Crisis. Deregulation refers to the reduction of governmental influence in an industry in order to create more competition (“Deregulation”, 2015). The reduction in government influence creates a more competitive market that

According to the specialists, there are many reasons for this global financial crisis. We try to focus some prime reasons behind this

The purpose of this paper is to show that the “regulatory capture” has played a role not easily measurable in causing the global financial crisis. To illustrate this, the first step will to describe the “regulatory capture” in its three possible qualifications; then, I will explain, providing some examples, how each of these categories played a possible role in posing the basis for the financial crisis. While illustrating the different forms of capture I will present some questions that leave space to different answers. Finally, I will conclude that the regulatory capture have surely played a role in generating the crisis, but it is not possible to evaluate the effective role it had in causing it.

The goal of financial regulation is to increase efficiency in the market, as well as enhance the market 's ability to absorb shock caused by financial instability. There are many reasons for financial instability, but it can be narrowed down to

At the same time, the regulators should be as transparent as possible and fully accountable. The accountability and transparency of the regulator will increase the credibility of the regulator and in-turn benefit the regulated entity. Types of Financial Regulation Financial regulation in a country can be done either by a single body called a single regulator or multiple bodies co-existing and working together or in a hierarchy of entities known as multiple regulators. A regulator whether single or multiple does not determine the economic standing of a country or its financial strength. Many developed countries of the world follow either the system of single regulation or multiple regulations. Often in times of economic crisis or financial boom in the country’s economy the government of the nation will review its regulatory system and choose to expand or close down some of its regulatory bodies.