William Shakespeare had a knack for implementing “bromance” into his plays, as seen with Mercutio and Romeo in Romeo and Juliet, or Horatio and Hamlet in Hamlet- and Julius Caesar is no exception. Among the entire play, there three major relationships present: Brutus and Cassius; Antony and Caesar; and Antony and Octavius. Brutus and Cassius were lead conspirators in the murder of Julius Caesar. Antony was a noble in support of Caesar, and Octavius was Caesar’s nephew. Both sought revenge over the conspirators. Julius Caesar himself was, of course, in line to lead Rome before he was brutally stabbed. In this literary analysis, three topics will be discussed: how they compare with heterosexual marriages, if the relationships were friendships or merely military alliances, and Shakespeare’s larger message in regard to these relationships. It will soon be shown that the friendships in Julius Caesar show a more profound view on the characters than they first seem. Some of these relationships were mostly or purely military alliances, but every notable friendship became a view into the character. First, the comparison of friendships to marriages in the play. The love between Brutus and Cassius is brought up frequently during the play, when Brutus said “For this present, I would not, so with love I might entreat you, Be any further moved.” to Cassius. This quote not only presents the friendship between the two men, but also illustrates Cassius’s efforts to involve Brutus in his
Julius Caesar is very much a warrior and he thinks that he is above every one else and that he is more than an ordinary man. As a result he is very arrogant and takes very little notice of the people around him. As far as he is concerned, they are meaningless and not worth his time. He believes he is honourable but really is not. In a way he wants to be trusted and to be a trusted leader of the Roman people but he is very unwilling to do anything to gain trust. Ordinary people have a great deal of respect for Caesar and probably believe that he would be a good, powerful leader who has Roman's troubles at heart. Caesar probably believes those things as well but he is ruthless and he craves power. He also believes that everybody likes him
While the love between Portia and Brutus is equally reciprocated, we can see and contrast Calphurnia's love for Caesar this way. Portias' concern for Brutus
Shakespeare’s complex play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar contains several tragic heroes; a tragic hero holds high political or social esteem yet possesses an obvious character flaw. This discernible hubris undoubtedly causes the character’s demise or a severe forfeiture, which forces the character to undergo an unfeigned moment of enlightenment and shear reconciliation. Brutus, one of these tragic heroes, is a devout friend of the great Julius Caesar, that is, until he makes many execrable decisions he will soon regret; he becomes involved in a plot to kill the omniscient ruler of Rome during 44 B.C. After committing the crime, Mark Antony, an avid, passionate follower of Caesar, is left alive under Brutus’s orders to take his revenge on
Marc Antony, Brutus, and Cassius are all critical characters in William Shakespeare’s famous play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Due to their distinctive personalities and values, there is no trait that all of these characters share, although they do share some traits with one another. Firstly, Marc Antony and Cassius are manipulative in nature, while Brutus is not. Secondly, the root of Brutus and Cassius’ failure is their personality flaw, while Marc Antony proves strong in all the ways they prove weak. Lastly, Antony and Cassius, unlike Brutus, do not separate their private affairs from their public actions while acts only with honor and virtue and completely ignores his personal concerns.
Relationships between characters play a great part in Julius Caesar, the Shakespearean tragedy about the scheming of Caesar's death, which then are shown to affect all aspects of Roman life. Some relationships show the concealed discord between characters, some show the conniving spirit of those who desire power, while others show how some hearts are devoted entirely to the greater good of the republic. The dialogue between Brutus and Portia, along with that of Calphurnia and Caesar, plays a significant role in the development of the plot. Portia is a symbol of Brutus's private life, a representative of correct intuition and morality, just as Calphurnia is for Caesar, but
Throughout the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, one man stands out in recognition of his nobility to his country, this man is just as Antony says, Brutus. There are multiple reasons why he stands out over the rest of the characters in the play, along with that are some of the characters that are the opposite to noble. This play demonstrates many ongoing themes such as friendship, conspiracy and trust. These feelings are what eventually will bring these men into a war.
Pathos: “… any dear friend of Caesar's, to him/ I say that Brutus' love to Caesar was no less than his.” (III, ii, 18-9)
Caesar’s relationships between prominent Romans and the Senate were a result of the tension between the populares and the optimates: while individuals such as Caesar sought mutually beneficial political alliances to fulfil their own ambitions, the optimates resisted the undermining of the established Republican system of government. Caesar’s political alliances were a method of gain for all involved individuals, however to usurp absolute power, these relationships were necessarily temporary and unstable in nature. Following the dictatorship of Sulla (82 BC), the Senate were especially wary of the accumulation of power by an individual, causing Caesar’s relationship with the Senate to become increasingly tense as his political and military
There have been many rulers in history who have been betrayed by those they trust, but The Tragedy of Julius Caesar (William Shakespeare,1959) still holds a special place in Western literature as one of the most enigmatic human beings to ever exist. Powerful men like Julius Caesar shaped the life and times of the late Roman Republic, just before Rome would officially become the Roman Empire on the crowning of Augustus as the first Roman emperor. Julius Caesar was a powerful general who expanded Rome's power and who was beloved by the people for his generous charity after his successful conquests. Despite knowing the story of Julius Caesar to some extent, most 16th/17th century English would not have ever visited Rome, nor would know what the Roman Republic was like, which presented a unique opportunity to William Shakespeare to create a play unlike any other he had created before. (Shakespeare Julius Caesar, 1599) Shakespeare's Julius Caesar is a reimagining of Rome from a Elizabethan point of view, and despite some inaccuracies, the play depicts an enlightening view on Roman life, and the life of the Roman general, Julius Caesar.
Cassius and Brutus are like brothers, but this relationship based on lie. Both brutus and cassius don't want Caesar to take the throne and decide to kill him, but both have different reasons. Cassius is just jealous, and brutus has a real reason. Brutus thinks Caesar will ruin everything and will get power cazy. Although brutus and cassius team up, they are very different and have nothing in common in their personality and way of thinking.
A death of a hero; the fate chosen for the protagonist in most dramatic tragedies. Though, in William Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’, there are two characters that are given this outcome; Julius Caesar and Marcus Brutus. With the most potential, the self-titled, Julius Caesar possesses the characteristics that label him as this Tragic Hero. Caesar’s tragic flaw is hubris when he acknowledges himself. The insight of others that observe Caesar, prove his high ranking. Caesar also struggles with internal conflict when he makes key decisions in the play. By examining his tragic flaw, high rank, and internal conflict, Julius Caesar is clearly the tragic hero in this tragedy.
Friends turn on each other all the time, but not like Brutus and Caesar. William Shakespeare’s play, “Julius Caesar” revolves around Caesar’s assassination and the outcomes surrounding it. Brutus is one of Caesar’s closest friends but is convinced to help murder him. The murder takes place before Caesar gains controls of Rome, as a measure of preemptive action. Brutus’s precautionary action against Caesar is not justified because he does not have proof, Caesar is a good man, and it makes things worse for Rome.
Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar dramatizes the historical assassination of Caesar by conspiring senators. Brutus, a well-respected senator, famous for his honor and closeness to Caesar, is persuaded by the sly Cassius to join a conspiracy to kill Caesar. On Caesar’s way to the Senate, Brutus and the other Senators surround and kill Caesar. Shortly after the murder, Brutus and Cassius summon their armies and wage war against Mark Antony and Octavius, allies of Caesar, who laid claim to the throne. Brutus’ armies defeated, he commits suicide and the play ends.
Julius Caesar was really good friends with Antony and Brutus. Brutus had gotten pulled in too a group with a couple of other people that wanted to kill Caesar. Brutus had been the one to stab him in the back and that was his really good friend. But he had been talked into it and was fed lies. Later in the play they had gone to the downtown of rome. Antony and Brutus had given speeches about Caesar.
Who Are We, Who Should We Be When you look at yourself in the mirror, who do you see? Who do you want to see? In the tragedy play “Julius Caesar” written by William Shakespeare, Shakespeare uses broken trust and friendships to show readers what humans are capable of and how humans should truly act. Julius Caesar was the leader of Rome, liked by many, but for a few of what he thought were his closest, they planned to murder Caesar and let Brutus, Caesar’s best friend take a stand for leader of Rome. Although Brutus and Caesar were close, Brutus let Caesar’s other “backstabbers” fool him into thinking that he should be leader of Rome; Therefore when the time of the assassination had come, Brutus taking the final stab, had become the worst “backstabber” of them all.