Humans Can Not Be Replaced By Machines

Robots can effect employment in a negative way,as said by the author Kelly “It may be hard to believe… 70 percent of today’s occupation will likewise be replaced by automation...even you will have your job taken away by machines”(Kelly Page.300), this quote comes to show the negative aspect of robots taking over the world in the near

In the essay “Better than Human” Kevin Kelly states his thesis hat robots will someday replace humans in the work place. Kelly starts by explaining how the Industrial Revolution has changed the way manual labor is performed as a result of automation; replacing humans with machines. Kelly says that the increasing demand for automation, artificial intelligence has given machines the ability to manage tasks from “manual labor to knowledge work.” (300) Kelly then says that robots will begin to replace blue and white collar jobs such as, assembly, heavy lifting, analytical, and medical applications. Kelly explains the innovative breakthrough named Baxter, a robot typically made for industrial applications

Machines have a huge impact on human life in a positive way and a negative way

They are nimble. They are shrewd. They are tenacious. Everyday more robots with artificial intelligence are being created with the sole purpose of making human lives easier. Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, describes a future where machines are a basic part of the citizen’s lives, and that time where resourceful robots and humans are able to coexist in harmony is rapidly coming. Intelligent machines push humans and automatons towards a world where machines can help humans in low level jobs, where machines and humans can explore together, and where machines and humans can save lives together.

When humans created artificial intelligence, the machines believed they were superior than humans and rebelled. They survived by imprisoning the humans, thus believing that their lifestyle and culture was superior to the humans. This “slavery” of the humans is similar to the slavery that happened in the nineteenth century, where some people believed they were superior to others. Once the machines in the movie believed they did not need to labor to the humans.

And though the machine isn’t human itself, its death still plays an important role in the story, an unfortunate truth every living must experience. The eerie setting is established from the very beginning, as the technologically advanced smart-house

In “Who Can Replace a Man?” by Brian Aldiss, Aldiss walks the reader through his vision for the future. The setting that Aldiss has created is full of human destruction and carelessness upon the Earth. His vision consists of machines who think and speak for themselves. These machines were created by the humans to work for them by taking orders daily. However, when the humans stop making orders, the machines become chaotic and start fighting. Eventually, they realize that humans have become extinct from starvation. A group made of a filed-minder, pen-propeller, radio operator, and a few other machines come together to venture off and rule themselves. (The machines are quite glad that man has gone extinct.) Eventually, when they reach their destination,

Even if living inside a machine wasn’t a possibility, if I as I am could remain the same way for the rest of time as we know it, I would probably drive myself crazy trying to find ways to commit suicide. Its nearly impossible for me to even fathom what it would even remotely be like to be sentenced to life forever. I wouldn’t want to have to be around for all of the terrible and inevitable occurrences that are just right around the corner. Sure I could just cut myself off from society and spend my days in a cave coming up with wacky hypotheses and ideas, but that’s not really how I see my ideal future

Imagine being in a society where everything is ran by intelligent machines, even the most basic tasks. In today’s society, a lot of goods and services are already supplied by these machines, and if society as a whole doesn’t stop handing their jobs over to these machines, the human race will end up like it did in Disney’s WALL-E. The human race will develop a lack of initiative, and won’t have any jobs, which can lead to them being stripped of their humanity.

This is due to the fact that a war that consists entirely of machines would be impossible to fund, humans will always have the instinct to fight, and today we do not have the technology enabling machines to be able to make ethical decisions that humans can.

We as humans always look for something greater. We can find that if we stick together and push the world to continue down the road of further automation, which would end in a fully automated luxury society. A society like this is the idea that with automation of robots that humans can live a life completely devoid of the need to work for basic necessities or that of most needs. This does not assume that humanity will lose any ability function alone

In “Who Can Replace a Man?’’ Brian Aldiss communicates a story about machines who rule themselves after man passes away. Though the machines are intelligent and strong all does work out in the end as they go back to obeying man. Through the relationship between machines and men Aldiss communicates that machines are ultimately dependent on human intelligence.

Although machines with Artificial Intelligence would be great, there are certain risks involved in the manufacturing of such machines. Imagine a scenario whereby a machine was trained with the wrong training set, and such a training set contained details on how to crash the stock market. If a machine places several orders and cancels them before people could buy them, over a long period of the time then there would be a fall in the price of stocks (Michael Maiello, 2015). This could crash an economy and cause mass unemployment. When people are unemployed there is usually a rise in the crime rate. The crash of the stock market is not even the worst case scenario if the knowledge of Artificial intelligence is utilized by the wrong set of people.

What if the machine brought a leader out of power by exposing their scandals and other flaws. What if the machine started a machine apocalypse, like in so many movies.

Hollywood blockbusters such as Terminator and Terminator Two have fueled the idea of artificial intelligence taking on humanoid characteristics and taking over the world. Let me answer the last question once and for all. It is not possible for a robot to think, feel, or act for itself, it may be programmed to mimic the actions, but not experience the real thing. We can program them to react to a certain stimulus, but a robot cannot and will never be able to comprehend, have feelings genuine guilt and much less act without the use of a programmer some were along the line. The second question is also a rather simple one. Of course there are robots that should not be created. For example, robots made for the sole purpose of mass destruction or robots made with the intention of harm to