Rhetorical Analysis Of George Thoreau 's Letter From Birmingham Jail

In the article Civil Disobedience, Henry David Thoreau convinces his audience that if someone has a problem with the government they should be able to protest and stand up. Henry convinces the audience of such by using ethos and imagery. Henry shows this by using this terms to tell his audience that they can not be quiet and just follow the government. Henry uses ethos in order to convince his argument.

Thoreau refused to pay the poll ax because the money was being used to finance a war he was against. This war was over Texas, which was to enter the Union as a slave state. He wrote Civil Disobedience while in the Walden jail. Thoreau wrote how disappointed he was with the government by forcing him to pay a poll tax that supported a war and slavery. King would later go to jail acting on his beliefs. Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau used civil disobedience to change people’s ideas and beliefs to stop the injustice brought against them and their nation.

What is the overall message of Thoreau's "Solitude"? Consider the term epiphany, which is a moment of clarity and understanding. Is there such a moment in this essay? If so, what triggers it?

A similarity in both the essays is that both Martin Luther King jr. and Henry David Thoreau advocated civil disobedience. King mentions in “letter from Birmingham Jail”, “Over the last few years I have consistently preached that nonviolence demands that the means we use must be as pure as the ends we seek”. King states in his letter how important it is to peacefully protest and not violently retaliate. Thoreau also stated how he did not desire to fight or be superior to his neighbors. In “Civil Disobedience” Thoreau revealed, “ I do not wish to quarrel with any man or nation. I do not wish to split hairs, to make fine distinctions, or set myself up as better than my neighbors”. These humble man only care to change racial injustice and inequality, so that the world can evolve to a place where everyone is equal.

It’s the end of the school day. I finally breathe and release myself of the stress and the frustration of a normal school day. I sit on the benches outside and wait for my ride. With technology gone and no people to talk to, I just sit still. The evergreen trees gently move in some of the final gusts of the summer breeze. And as I’m looking at life’s beauty and as thoughts swim through my brain, I become frightened. Because, I have never thought of life, as a whole, so profoundly. It transforms into satisfaction. Without distractions, I sit with my thoughts and world’s alluring nature. As I relive this moment in my mind, I can’t help but think of Henry David Thoreau. How he just sometimes sat and took in everything, and absorbed everything

To begin, King uses techniques of diction like antithesis and connotation to help get his message across to the clergymen. First, he develops antithesis to strengthen his purpose. King makes this stand out to the clergymen by putting words together such as, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,"and “...freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed,”so they take notice wording. (282, 284) King wants this to stand out for the clergymen and notice the opposite meanings. This helps bring attention to the opposite words being placed together to get across Drawing the clergymen to pay closer attention It builds on what he truly wants to get across. King uses the words “never” and “must” to build emotional appeals with the clergymen, but also have them have a sense of what is going through his mind, when he is protesting willing in the streets of Birmingham. He wants to make them see truly the effects the African Americans have gone through either segregation and make them realize how they are at fault for continuing to support this behavior and not help out. “Injustice” and “Justice” help force the clergymen to take notice of the powerful association and have them think over it. It stands out as they read the letter, but also makes them think over it as they continue reading. The phrase makes the clergymen wonder if what

The articles “Letter to Birmingham jail” and “Civil Obedience” both address the injustices that are being done to people of color. Martin Luther king Jr and Henry David Thoreau speak on the act of civil disobedience being necessary and both believed that the government needs to address the issue and make a change if they truly believe their laws should protect and affect everyone equally. Martin Luther King uses a first person narrative and several types of rhetoric such as Simile, Allusion, Appeal to authority, imagery, personification, and metaphor. He also uses logos Ethos and Pathos from the rhetorical analysis triangle. Henry David Thoreau also uses first person narrative and similar rhetoric such as Appeal to authority, Simile, Imagery, Allusion, Metaphor, Ethos and Pathos from the rhetorical Analysis triangle. They both has similar ideas but had a different target when arguing for equal rights. Dr. King wants to ultimately raise awareness and provide equal rights for black people and Thoreau wanted equal rights for each individual person.

King, however, approaches the situation with a better response. He does criticize the government and their abuse of power like Thoreau, but he does so without attacking the government. King is respectful and calm through his writing and keeps his audience engaged throughout the letter. Thoreau immediately attacks and does not give an explanation on how to fix the situation. Even though, their writings and approach to the subject are different, they are still able to convey their message to their audience and to other who may read their

The two essays, "Civil Disobedience," by Henry David Thoreau, and "Letter From a Birmingham Jail," by Martin Luther King, Jr., effectively illustrate the authors' opinions of justice. Each author has his main point; Thoreau, in dealing with justice as it relates to government, asks for "not at once no government, but at once a better government. King contends that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Both essays offer a complete argument for justice, but, given the conditions, King's essay remains more effective, in that its persuasive techniques have more practical application. Both essays extensively implement both

Directions: Read “Civil Disobedience.” As you read, underline examples of Thoreau using rhetorical devices and identify and explain the devices via annotation. Answer questions 1-4 to prepare for further work with a small group. The group will work together on questions 5 through 8. Be ready to explain your answers to the whole class. Even when you’re working as a group you should be writing the answers.

Today I will be comparing Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau and The Letter from a Birmingham Jail by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and taking a closer look at their rhetorical devices and strategy’s. In Civil disobedience by Henry David Thoreau shows us the need to prioritize some one’s wellbeing over what the law says. American laws are criticized mostly over slavery and the Mexican-American war. In Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” was written in response to a letter written by clergymen criticizing the actions of Dr. King and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) during their protests in Birmingham, Alabama.

While both Martin Luther King Jr. and David Thoreau recognized that society needed modification, they acquired contrasting perspectives about the dilemma. King writes out of concern for the African-American race and believes that even though law states, something is wrong, it could be right. Thoreau believes writes out of frustration and that "Government is best which governs not at all." (Thoreau 407). King and Thoreau agree that everyone has the ability to take charge, on the other hand, their actions are distinct in many ways.

Without a doubt, people of all ages are constantly trying to fit in.They try to mold themselves into the type of person society says they should be in order to be accepted. Some are too concerned with gaining the approval of others that they lose themselves along the way. Eventually, they'll stop listening to society and try to figure out who they are as an individual. In the play The Night Thoreau Spent in Jail, which was written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, the protagonist named Henry David Thoreau encounters challenges because he goes against the norms of society. He isolates himself from everyone to figure out his purpose in life only to rejoin society later on. There's two common methods people use when

Within our education Emerson has come up with maxims that explain the universal themes of our

In The Night Thoreau Spent in Jail, written by the transcendentalist and admirer of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, Emerson's maxim "Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind," is seen throughout the play in multiple scenes. Since Thoreau is known for taking Emerson's words into action, it is no surprise that his writing would contain the same purpose. The maxim refers to how one should act in a religious sense regardless of how much of a contrast it is when compared to how others behave. It is mostly seen when Henry goes to church, but not to worship, and when Henry refuses to pray for John. Connecting to the theme of how religion and self-preservation make people lazy in their worship, the play demonstrates how