Scott Sanders uses many strategies to explain his view on moving. To persuade us of his perspective the author uses juxtaposition, logos, and anticipating objection as his main strategies. These three topics will be expanded on in the following paragraphs. In order to develop his argument, he places the work of Salmon Rushdie next to his. They are very opposing viewpoints on moving. By using this technique, the author hopes to convince the reader he is right just by seeing both sides. Within his commentary he uses logos to try to logically convince the reader. One use is “wholesale dis-placement may be inevitable; but we should not suppose without disastrous consequences for Earth and for ourselves.” This is also on example of him
In “Bring Back Flogging”, Jeff Jacoby addresses the problems within America 's criminal justice system. He gives many reasons why imprisonment simply does not work, and suggests that corporal punishment should be used as an alternative. Published in the Boston Globe, a newspaper well known for being liberal, Jacoby provides a conservative view and directs his argument towards those who strongly support imprisonment and view corporal punishment to be highly barbaric and inhumane. However, in order to shed light on our current situation, Jacoby discusses the dangers that we face though our criminal justice system a nd shows concern that imprisonment is doing more harm than good. In effect, Jacoby looks to the past for solutions, and
Advertisements are everywhere. From billboards, to magazines, to newspapers, flyers and TV commercials, chances are that you won’t go a day without observing some sort of ad. In most cases, companies use these ads as persuasive tools, deploying rhetorical appeals—logos, pathos, and ethos—to move their audiences to think or act in a certain way. The two magazine ads featured here, both endorsing Pedigree products, serve as excellent examples of how these modes of persuasion are strategically used.
When you see a solider in his or her uniform, you are proud that they are serving this country to protect our freedom, securing our country, and defending democracy worldwide. The solider can come from different branches of the Military. The one you might be familiar with is the U.S. Army. These soldiers are well respected and prepared to serve our country whenever and wherever needed, combat-ready at all times, and trained to counter any threat, anywhere. In 2007, the United States Army department published a recruitment ad for U.S.
As well as attacking the habits of others, Sanders uses his own experiences to illustrate his way of life, writing, “The longing to become an inhabitant rather than a drifter sets me against the current of my culture” (18). Sanders’s statement that he, unlike others, has managed to resist the “current” of his culture that forces people to be transient creates the impression that he is preaching about his superior method of living. He thereby suggests that he is better than all of the others who do follow the call that inspires people to move. At the end of his piece, Sanders makes his argument even more moralistic by tying the desire to move to a lack of spiritualism. He makes an allusion to idolism in declaring, “Only by knocking against the golden calf of mobility, which looms so large and shines so brightly, have
In May of 1998, Kipland Kinkel brought a gun to his school. Over the course of two days this escalated from: being sent home, to murdering his father and mother, to murdering 2 students and wounding 26, earning a lifetime sentence of 111 years and 8 months in prison. In the court case being examined, the presiding judge addresses the original case, defendants ground for appeal, and the justification for the State’s decision to deny the appeal. Judge Haselton effectively uses ethos, logos, and pathos to support the Higher Court’s decision to deny the appeal because the original sentence was constitutional and just.
Do traffic signals make a difference when drivers are conducting their vehicles? In U.K. the roads have less signs and are smaller roads than in the United States. The United States has great amounts of traffic signals and symbols all over the road to make the driver more aware. In the U.K. accidents do occur but not that often has in the United States. In the Unites States every second there is huge amounts of accidents going on over the nation. John Staddon in his magazine article “Distracting Miss Daisy” tries to persuade that traffic control is making traffic more dangerous because we do not pay attention to the road, but to the signals.
Scott Sanders has a very specific view when it comes to moving. When responding to Salman Rushdie’s essay, Sanders uses specific devices and strategies to develop his perspective. Sanders quotes parts of Rushdie’s essay to express his views on moving.
The separation of church and state is an ongoing debate that effects everyone, even if you are not aware of it. There are many arguments to this debate, and both sides are heavily supported. I will be analyzing two sources that support the separation of church and state but used two different forms of rhetoric to support the separation.
Since before the moon launch, America has been infatuated with winning at any cost. This competitive nature translates from war rooms to athletic fields to the top of corporate ladders. If this is truly our nation’s identity, then why have we not constructed a space elevator? A space elevator is one of the more extravagant ideas from sci-fi and now is being thought of by the capitol of our beloved country. The US must take the initiative and build a space elevator, allowing travel into space at a cheaper price, act as a symbol of greatness for our country, and carry payloads of 11,193kg at once (allowing eight climbers to be sent up by the tether (Chang 2011)) [cumulative sentence]. The thought that an elevator could, or even should, stretch from the Earth into space, allowing people to ride a capsule into orbit baffles many, yet there are
In her article “Tattoos are no longer permanent but removal can be a long and costly business,” Victoria Lambert (2015) explains that tattoos can be removed with laser, an injectable liquid and surgery. However, the process for each option is not only time consuming, expensive, painful, but can also have severe consequences. Lambert points out that most people, a while after they have been tattooed, figure out the useless of their body art, and decide to pay any price to get them removed. He affirms that the laser option, in addition, to being expensive, extensive and painful, can also cause skin disorders with the uncertainty of complete removal. Lambert also claims that another possibility, which is the liquid injectable, is not efficient
For example, in lines 69-76, King answers the critics questioning of his use of direct action and marches to protest against segregation. He states that “nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored” (71-73). This explanation is so broken down and easy to understand that it would not make sense to disregard it and agree with the critics. Another instance in which King uses logos is when, as mentioned above, he references the Holocaust and Hitler’s mistreatment of Jews in lines 181 to 185. He discusses how the definitions of “illegal” and “legal” were skewed during that horrific time period. King connects how the definitions in Germany during the Holocaust are similar to the definitions during the Civil Rights Movement about segregation. This appeals to the critics and readers logos because it forces them to think about how terrible the Holocaust was and the treatment of Jews, and realize that the Jews and the African-Americans were being treated in a similar sense. The way King uses logos, is very effective because he makes his ideas and points have sound reasoning while politely diminishing the reasoning of the
In MOVEME, Marcal Graham claims, “Many things affect our freedom as thinkers. We are imprisoned by others who keep our minds from growing immeasurably and unchallenged. We are challenged when we don’t question the implications and impact –negative or positive—of our decisions. As a result, many people are confined by their perceptions, attitudes, and internal mental maps of the world around them” (35). The people we choose to be in our lives have the greatest effect on how we live, what we do, and especially how we think. Graham’s comment can inspire the younger generation and reveal how the people they hang around can have a negative effect on their mindset.
On Saturday September 3rd, between 6:30 and 7 I went to the Arlington Parks Mall to observe the movement of others. In that short period of time I observed at least a hundred people, some I analyzed closer than others. Despite the fact that I am a creature that produces movement as well, and am someone who is not new to seeing others in action, there were some new revelations that were made apparent to me about movement outside of the expectations I already had. (3) First and foremost, people’s movements, like the finger prints that we are born with are unique to each individual; movement is a rainbow of flavors, no person moves exactly like the next. When I was observing in the mall the first and most common movement I noticed was walking.
To my knowledge, this branch of philosophy, at its peak of relevance and development in Europe (1940s to 60s) echoed and addressed the isolation that loomed in the shadow of the Second World War. It discussed the solitary decision making that our individual value systems are composed of, and the inherent freedom involved with the making of these decisions. It discusses existence as being the source of all phenomena we experience and ponder as humans. The “Walking Man” does not seem to own this philosophy or embody it, he is rather a subject of it. An estranged but functional victim of the moral structures that existential thinkers
“this moving without thinking about the place you want to end up, or considering how you want to get there, is like Kerouac’s spontaneous writing, when he does not think about what precisely he wants to write in which order, he just writes without pausing to think”