Role Of American Government Involvement In Family Life

Government policies and laws include tax and benefit policies as well as legislation such as that relating to divorce and marriage. Sociologists have different views on the impact of these policies and laws on families. For example, feminists argue that social policies assume that the ideal family is a patriarchal nuclear family, and that government policies and laws therefore favour this sort of family.

Such things can lead to difficulties at home and even the possibility of having more children; which in return would lead to more expenses. If there are issues at home due to fighting with the significant other that will then lead to the women’s work being affected and threatening their already low income. Majority of the women’s money goes to two major things; expenses on day care and food for their children. The major issue of the two expenses lies within the food that is purchased for their children.

This essay, The Myth of the Model American Family, is a discussion of the concept of an ideal family in the different perspective specifically social, cultural and economic. This is also an attempt to identify the structural changes in relation to the global development and the international economic crisis that immensely created impact on their lives. However, the discussion will limit itself on the different identifiable and observable transformations as manifested in the lifestyles, interrelationships and views of family members and will not seek to provide an assessment of their psycho-social and individual perceptions.

They may need more support from government by way of benefits, treatments or services if they are unable to support the needs of their family on their own. In extreme cases there may also be the cost of legal cases, criminal activities and uprisings, all of which have to be covered by the tax payers.

There is an ongoing argument about the funding of Planned Parenthood in the United States. There are many reasons that some people do not want to fund it. One of those reasons is because Planned Parenthood offers abortions to women. There are people who believe that these operations should be shut down to rid our country of abortions. However, Planned Parenthood offers much more than just abortions in their clinics. Planned Parenthood should be funded because of the examinations and resources they provide, the education they give, and because it is a low income health center.

The U.S. made many daring decisions at the end of the 19th century. These gambles the U.S. made helped to guide the country to the path of greatness. At that time, the U.S. was looking to expand economically and improve its grip on the world. The U.S. government knew making some good choices would be critical to set the U.S. on the path to success in the following decades. The purchase of Alaska in 1867 and the annexation of Hawaii in 1898 were two of the crucial decisions. The outcomes of these decision aided the U.S. throughout the end of the 19th century and into the present. Both of these allowed for the expansion of land and had a positive influence economically for the citizens. Many things that people are accustomed to today would not be available if the U.S. did not challenge what others believed and do what the government thought was right at that point in history. The purchase of Alaska in 1867 and the annexation of Hawaii in 1898 greatly benefited the U.S. on a worldly scale in many different aspects.

Healthy Families America is a program created in 1992 by the Prevent Child Abuse America Program. The Ronald McDonald foundation contributes by founding to the program. Their mission is “to work with families who may have histories of trauma, intimate partner violence, mental health and or substance abuse issues” (Berger, 2000). Their goals are to enhance positive parent-child relationships, better the health of children, and prevent child abuse and neglect. HFA hope that by the end of the program the outcome for the family and children are, reduced maltreatment, positive parent-child interactions and children’s social-emotional well-being; increase school readiness; child physical health and development; positive parenting; family self-sufficiency; increase access to primary care medical services and community services; and finally a decrease in child injuries and emergency department use (Implementing Healthy Families America, 2015).

The one topic that I found the most interesting was Wegscheider-Cruse’s and Blacks family roles. I really enjoyed this section because it got me thinking about which role I best fit and all of the various ways that my family members and I adapted to the substance abuse issues that occurred in our household. After lots of thought, I came to conclusion that I took on the role as the hero/responsible child. I always did really well in school and in the sports that I played. I always felt bad about for my family and what everyone had to go through and sacrifice so I found myself trying to succeed and bring a more positive light into the family. I never wanted to cause any issues with anyone or be difficult because I never wanted to add to all of the stress. Growing up I was by far, more responsible than my older brother. Although the oldest child normally takes on the role of the hero, this role fit me best. I would like to think that I have really good organization skills and have set reasonable goals throughout life that I have been able to achieve. It was very clear to me that I could not rely on my father growing up because of his substance abuse issues. This pushed me to be very independent knowing that my mother already had a lot on her plate.

Many families in America are barely making ends meet. Forty two million women are living in

However, the government assistance programs system are often misused. Although some people are unable to obtain government assistance, it is the duty of the American government to take care of the people. An example of the American government taking care of its citizens is the military protecting the country. Government assistance programs are meant to benefit the low class and lower middle economic classes, but even with government assistance programs and support there are still Americans living under the poverty line. Government programs such as welfare, among others, are intended to aid citizens but, are not intended for long term or high capacity use. Impoverished Americans desperately need government support, a raise in the minimum wage is not sufficient. Deciding on who gets aid and who does not should not be an issue of resources for the

In my current home state of Colorado the Department of Human Services (DHS) has a number of programs to help those in need. Whether a family needs assistance financially, with medical care or help with getting food to eat, DHS is there for them. Current programs do not have to only help families either. Adults in need such as those who are disabled or require monetary aid can receive DHS assistance as well. Finally, in the event that an older individual passes away, there are assistance programs for burials as well since they can be quite expensive.

The U.S. has suffered from many Natural Disasters from Hurricane Katrina to wildfires in California. When it comes too natural disasters Hurricanes are by far one of the most devastating. The results can be catastrophic, possibly leaving the death tolls in thousands and leaving millions homeless. Even though the U.S. has responded to and recovered from Hurricanes, Meteorologists are presently not able to predict them early enough, and the U.S. government is unprepared financially, and responsively. Being well prepared for a hurricane is critical to saving peoples lives and their well-being. The government needs to do more not for just hurricanes but any disaster.

The families in America are steadily changing. While they remain our most valued and consistent source of strength and comfort, some families are becoming increasingly unstructured. In the past, the typical family consists of a working father, a stay at home mother and, of course, well-rounded children. Today, less than 20 percent of American families fit nicely into this cookie cutter image. American households have never been more diverse. Natalie Angier takes stock of the changing definition of family in an article for the New York Times.

Times have changed; the nuclear family is no longer the American ideal because family needs have changed since the 1950's. This American convention of a mother and father and their two children, were a template of films and early television as a depiction of the American family life. Now seen as archaic and cliché by today’s standards, but the idea is common throughout many of the first world nations in the world. This ideal was a vast departure from the past agrarian and pre industrial families, and was modeled and structured as the ‘American dream’ father working, mother maintaining the household and children molded to be simulacra of the parents. This portrayal was not the standard; many communities throughout America had a different

n the upcoming page’s I will answer the following questions. Why is family the most important agent of socialization? What caused the dramatic changes to the American family? What are the changes? I will discuss the differences in marriage and family, I will discuss how they are linked to class, race, gender, and personal choices. The purpose of this study is to explore the many different family functions and the paths that people are now choosing. I will give my opinion on whether these changes have had a positive or negative affect. I will finally discuss the trend of the modern family, back to pre-World War II family structure, how would that effect the strides that have been made in the progression of women rights.