Scientific Method Vs Observational Question

In the reading it says that a hypothesis is “a tentative explanation that can be tested and is based on observation and/or scientific

In the science of Psychology, observations and inferences are equally important. Observation is the act of perceiving, of noticing, of watching something closely. On the other hand, inference is looking at the evidence in front of you and making a deduction of your own based on what you see. When somebody observes something or someone they just state the facts as they appear before their eyes, whereas in inference they reach a conclusion by assuming or deducting things as well. For example, an observation would be “

We discover scientific knowledge in various natural science fields such as biology or chemistry. A common misconception about the natural sciences is that both the knowledge they reveal to us and the scientific method used in discovering this are purely analytical. This means that these sciences are rigid in facts and do not contain any subjectivity or creativity. However, the scientific method is not a rigid system of pursuing measurable facts. It contains fallacies and biases. In testing hypotheses, performing observations, or reasoning inductively, science is undoubtedly flawed and erroneous. Paradigms, commonly seen as infallible and containing rather insignificant errors, contribute to many of the errors involved in scientific

    One possible source of error that can affect the results was that a mercury thermometer was used instead of an electronic one. The use of a mercury

So, somebody can make a certain observation and come up with a hypothesis about how and why a phenomenon occurs the way it is. Hypothesis could be

(a.) A scientific theory has two components; a pattern, and a process that creates the pattern. A hypothesis is a testable statement that explains a phenomenon of a set of observations.

A theory is a set of systematic informed hunches about the way things work. A good theory goes beyond accepted wisdom and offers explanations and speculations about phenomena. Additionally, a good theory consists of a system of concepts which means that the theorist were able to make connections among his ideas. A theory tends to shape our perception of reality and behaviour and guides us through unknown areas.

Hypotheses are often taken from a form of an if-then statement (Scott 2009) -- usually based on previous experience, scientific background, observation, and logic. While a scientific theory explains laws and facts (Scott 2009). Clearly, this is a contradiction. A hypothesis cannot be considered as a scientific theory since it is based on conditions that simply lacks a strong foundation to become a theory unless it’s proven to be concise otherwise.

In the article, “Researching Dealers and Smugglers,” Patricia Adler discusses her and her husband’s experience using participant observation to collect data from drug dealers and the problems this qualitative method brought. A qualitative method focuses on collecting rich, non-statistical data. This method involves face-to-face interviews and actual participation with the group being researched. The Adlers use this method because it is almost impossible to gather accurate information on people who smuggle drugs. This is true because they are such private and deceitful people. The only way to get the real facts is if the smugglers trust the person. Unfortunately, participant observation brought problems such as the dealers and smugglers

3. Theory is an ideal/principle based on different things such as evidence, personal experience, or previous experiments.

The first step in using the scientific method is to propose something to research or experiment on, which can be motivated by curiosity, or even elevated interests. As you seek your topic, feel free to examine others’ findings who have done similar experiments or research projects. In Los 33, the question boiled down to, “Will

As we talk about scientific thinking in class, we come upon the term of critical thinking to describe scientific thinking. When evaluating any sort of scientific claims, we must make sure that we are able to justify them and ignore any evidence that can blind from the truth. When we think scientifically, we must look at all the possibilities which are crucial to help us think critically. There are some explanations that need more evidence than what we really see because sometimes we do not see all the truth behind the reasoning, which include the six principles. Those six principles are ruling out rival hypothesis, correlation vs. causation, falsifiability, replicability, extraordinary claims and last

One way that scientist analyze and think differently is that they ask actual questions. They ask these questions because scientist are a curious bunch. They have to ask as many intellectual questions before they can accept it. A hypothesis is also a educated question upon the experiment that they are studying and trying to figure out. This

A hypothesis (literally Greek for "under proposition") is a prediction of what will happen in an experiment, essentially an educated guess. You're in chemistry, right? I hypothesize that when I drop Mentos into Diet Coke, there will be a reaction. Then, I conduct the experiment to determine whether my hypothesis is true or false. Hypothesis is like a prediction so for example if its for a science lab my hypothesis can be like this...I think the density of the egg is going to be more than the density of the 3 parts of the egg...just for example so its basically what you think is going to happen your prediction.

7. What is the difference between a hypothesis and a theory? (1 point) a hypothesis is centered on a specific idea while a theory is made up of different hypothesis