Thus, in all your communications, you should consider whether you are being fair to others (Cardon, 2013, p. 12). An effective leader is one that understands communication and their role within it. A successful leader is one that others believe to be a credible individual, meaning that they are trustworthy and demonstrate a high level of integrity (doing the right thing even when no one is looking). The idea behind the Scream Free website is that if one learns to become self- aware by focusing on them-selves and their emotional responses the calm that they exhibit will become infectious. They defined “screaming” as any emotional response with a desired outcome involved (Turner, 2014). According to the Scream Free ideology being calm (cool
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysGet Access
Life is full of trials and tribulations every day. How we learn to stay consistent with our demeanor, or our moods, and how we speak to people as well as how we look at them will set the tone for our mission and how we can accomplish our goals.It is amazing the different variations in leadership style that can determine or almost pre-determine one’s outcome to any situation. I have never considered why a boss or leader may act the way he or she does based on this criteria. I have only ever thought about it in terms of personality clashes. The fact that you can label these traits and understand what type of decisions will be made from this kind of assessment is both good and bad. Consequently, it is great if you say and do all the right things consistently; however it is enlightening if you don’t. Fortunately one can change behaviors or ideas that have been pre-determined to be wrong to create a more positive outcome.
I consider myself primarily a Feeler when it comes to communication, since I value getting to know people, hearing their stories and understanding their backgrounds when I am working with them. I enjoy talking openly as I make acquaintances or get to know new colleagues. For my secondary communicator style, I believe I am a Senser. Once I have gotten to know someone, I keep focused on the task at hand and attempt to complete it promptly and diligently. Both at college and with my work experience, I have noticed that it is easy to get distracted and talk about our daily lives and worries. However, I can also stay on the task at hand when completely on task.
Keith H. Basso’s ethnographic research titled, To Give up on Words: Silence in Western Apache Culture is an investigation of situations when members of a certain Apache community in the western United States assume the state of silence as a form of social interaction. In this paper, I will first note details of the society under consideration and Basso’s interests in regards to the questions he is trying to answer. I will introduce some anthropological concepts that are suitable to the discussion, followed by Basso’s observations regarding silence in the Apache community, including his methods, arguments, and conclusion. Finally, I will evaluate Basso’s findings and deduce if the evidence supports the conclusion made; I will
A leader must listen to its followers and vice versa. Both Gardner and Wooden in their books provide examples that both ineffective and effective communication can affect a group or organization—for better or worse. However, through positive open communication that is produced from the group can lead to positive and effective improvement (Wooden, 2005, p.198-201; Gardner,1990, p.86) for the work environment and respectability between leader and follower.
As a leader I think I am good with communicating with coworkers and patients. I am good at making sure coworkers understand clearly what needs to be done on a daily basis. I relate my vision to the team in order for us to reach the same goal. There is an open door for my team to be able to talk to me and discuss their concerns with the company or ideas on how to solve a certain situation. Having my team trust me is very important to me because they help the company grow and if they’re happy they give the best customer service. I make sure there is a positive energy even in tough situations. Even if the system is down or there is an angry patient, making sure my coworkers do not see me overwhelmed is key in a leader. Panicking well not help
A person with the steadiness style is a supporting individual with magnificent listening abilities. Individuals have a tendency to float towards his identity and appreciate being in his presence. He will advantage the group by obliging the status of quo, as he is awesome at looking after self-restraint. He is hesitant to change, dislikes taking risky initiatives, and will oblige others regardless of the fact that he doesn't agree along, to keep up steadiness and balance. The drawback is that he may get to be overpowered and bothered when he can't maintain stability.
In dealing with senior staff, rank and file employees, superiors, union leaders, elected officials, other city department heads, community and the media. However, communication alone cannot make a leader successful. People value what I say as the result of having an established reputation of caring, competence and credibility. They know that I can be counted on to get the job done and that I am a stickler for following up on issues and holding others accountable. I lead by example and follow the Golden Rule. I have had the ability to think and communicate strategically to lead through complex projects and effectively communicate
As Nancy Naeve puts it, “Don’t be bossy saucy.” This is good leadership because it helps leaders listen to their followers more and growing a relationship with them. If a leader listens to their followers it shows that they are confident enough in themselves to not be scared to be wrong and even if they are wrong they do not let it bother them. They accept the fact, adjust and move on. Even in the article, Four Essential Qualities for Leadership in Today’s Complex World, they talk about needing to “walk the
As I completed the styles under stress assessment test, I was not surprised and the results were expected of me. Because according to my own experience the results just emphasized on my personal reactions to similar circumstances and situations. Therefore, as I know myself, my communication behaviors, and management style’s experience in front of questions, I did not find difficult to answer the questions. For example, when others get defensive because they misunderstand me, I will get us back by clarifying what I do and do not mean. This could happen in different situations, such as family, community, workgroup or between individual friend, but with same result and reaction from me. So, I think if I thought of a different situation, I would
My father and my grandfather are both accomplished, self-taught guitarists. I began to learn the instrument as soon as I was able to hold a guitar at four years of age. In addition I have sought instruction from professional guitar instructors. However, I have realized a struggle with my own introversion and awkwardness with spoken communication in public. This might be a serious hinderance to a successful preforming musician. This struggle was highlighted when I was interviewed for a local culture story. I watched myself fumble with a few sentences on live television. Another example occurred when my high school music theory teacher sat on my desk last october for a little chat. ” He said, “ Really ? Have you ever performed? ” I said,
According to Cook (2009), a leader must demonstrate the four crucial EQ concepts; self-aware, self-management, awareness of others, and relating to others (p. 71), and being conscientious of their body language, tone of voice, and the words used (p. 74). The author further explains by applying the push and pull method, a leader has the foundation and capabilities of becoming a good leader (p. 75). Most leaders might think about the words they are going to say to a co-worker, so they can influence them in the direction they want them to go. However, many leaders do not pay much attention to their body language and when the two are not sending the same message it will cause a conflict in the received message. Applying the traits and behavior
The scene I'm going to describe is from my guilty pleasure show Crazy Ex-Girlfriend. The main character Rebecca has used lots of nonverbal communication throughout the show. In a recent episode, her ex-boyfriend Trent returns and blackmails her into being his girlfriend again. He kept her in her apartment for a few days and then she finally convinces him to go to her office to meet her coworkers. There Rebecca uses nonverbal communication to let her coworker and friend Paula know she is in trouble.
Two of the most prevalent forms of communication styles are direct and indirect communication; these two communication styles impact how members of a culture interact with each other (Morreale & Pearson, 2008). According to Craddock (2002), Kierkegaard, regarded direct communication, “as the mode for transferring information and considered it totally appropriate to the fields of history, science, and related disciplines” (p. 70). Direct communication can be defined as, “speech that specifically states and directs an action. When someone hears direct speech, they know immediately what needs to be done. There is no question about who is in charge, and usually no need for discussion” (Gaddis, 2006, p. 11). On the other hand, Kiergaard believed that, “the indirect was the mode for eliciting capability and action from within the listener, a transaction that did not occur by giving the hearer some information” (Craddock, 2002, p. 70). Unlike direct communication, “a indirect style of speech is not typically authoritative, rather it encourages input from the listener” (Gaddis, 2006, p. 11). The direct and indirect communication styles are often used in different fields, disciplines, and industries ranging from education, workplace, literature, and entertainment, to church services (Morreale & Pearson, 2008). For example, the population relies on the news media as the main source of information and the basis on which they form their opinions and voting decisions” (Fog, 1999, p.