preview

Section 215 Essay

Satisfactory Essays

This violates the attorney-client privilege which allows anyone to talk to their attorney in private and whatever is said can be held from the government or prosecutor. There is also a violation of the first amendment in which freedom of speech is taken away. It states that if someone talks about a terror investigation and gives away information regarding that investigation they can be prosecuted. This violation though is still being allowed though because they consider it to be inducing panic on the public. It is the same concept of that which you cannot yell “fire” in a crowded public space or “bomb” in an airport without being investigated by the police or some form of the police. It is supported because it start mass chaos which can lead …show more content…

It basically states that the FBI can obtain secret warrants to go through someone’s business files such as “driver’s license records, hotel records, car-rental records, apartment- leasing history and more”. It also says that the person is not allowed to tell anyone that one of these secret searches has been conducted (Carafano). Something else to note about this section is that the rate in which this is used is increasing. In 2009 it was used 21 to 96 orders in 2010. This is an increase of over 400% according to a report from the Washington Post and they also reported that 80% of these requests were to look at internet records. Another shocking piece of the Act is the National Security Letters. What this is, is the FBI can issue these NSLs and will be given access to someone’s phone records and bank account without getting a court order. A complete violation of the fourth amendment again. In 2000 there were 8,500 uses of these letters but from 2003-2006 there was 196,000 letters and that only lead to one terror conviction according to eff.org. These numbers are staggering because that means the government used most of these letters to look at innocent people’s personal

Get Access