Sentencing Of The Criminal Justice System Essay

1514 WordsNov 20, 20167 Pages
Sentencing criminals in court is not the easiest thing to for anyone involved, it’s usually a lengthy process that must go through examining evidence, interviewing witnesses and of course listening to the defense. When an offender has been found guilty, a judge must decide what their retribution will be, usually referring to set guidelines. These guidelines help judges decide what punishment would be best based on the offense, criminal history, whether a weapon was used, and many other facts. These judges follow what is known as the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (Champion 111). These guidelines may seem like a straightforward set of rules, but they are practically the complete opposite. They are extremely controversial as well as all the other sentencing laws like the three-strikes law, and mandatory minimums. All of these sentencing structures were supposed to help the criminal justice system, but there has been a lot of controversy about how it actually affects people and to society as a whole. Since the creation of sentencing the whole point of a trial was supposed to be fair, but that wasn’t happening and it became apparent. Slavery was abolished in 1865 but yet African Americans and other minorities were still being punished because of the color of their skin. This would happen in the worst of ways such as sentencing them to prison to get rid of them. Most of these people were innocent and many had a extensive sentence for an incredibly small offense. Most big figures in
Open Document