Serial Killers in the Media
Serial killers are a relatively rare, yet commonly publicized, part of our society. The media portrayal of serial killers skews the opinions and creates a stereotype of murderers for the public. James Knoll, MD states in his article, “Serial Murder: A Forensic Psychiatric Perspective”, that no evidence supports the idea that serial murder is a “growing epidemic” as people believe it is (qtd. in Johnson-Sheehan & Paine, “Writing Today”, pg 332). This misperception of serial killing was exhibited in the way the media portrayed the “Hillside Strangler”, a murderer who was killing women in the Los Angeles area by strangling them and leaving them nude in the hilly areas in 1977. The articles reporting the
…show more content…
Another article covering the case from The New York Times used similar language to make the killer seem worse. In the article, “Woman Found in Los Angeles Lot, 11th Apparent Victim of Strangling”, the killer is proclaimed to “prey on girls and young women” (Associated Press, “Woman Found in Los Angeles Lot, 11th Apparent Victim of Strangling”). ‘Preying’ has a certain association that comes with it, such as that the killer is an animal. Murderers obviously are not nice people but such wording makes them incredibly more fearful. The article also suggested a category of people who were most likely to be victimized: those from the “street scene” (Associated Press, “Woman Found in Los Angeles Lot, 11th Apparent Victim of Strangling”). Many articles announce the victim profile that is provided by the police to the public. This serves a purpose to warn people, but it is not the smoothest tactic. It may make people overly afraid. The “Woman Found in Los Angeles Lot, 11th Apparent Victim of Strangling” article is not the only example of this. Another article from the Associated Press published in The New York Times also stressed the targeted victim to the public. Declaring that a woman that was young was found murdered and disposed of nude must be a victim of the “Hillside Strangler” because of the profile (Associated Press, “Two Women Slain in Los Angeles, One a Possible ‘Strangler’
In today’s world, murderers aren’t a surprising thing, as long as they are fictional. Plenty of TV shows and movies have plot lines around murder, but what about real life? As Scott Bonn states in his writing, of the approximate 15,000 murders in the United States, only 1 percent are serial killings, amounting to about 150 victims per year, with between 25 and 50 serial killers active at any given time. There are plenty of statistics on serial killers. 1 in 20 had the same three characteristics as a child: bedwetting, fire setting, and torturing animals. Animal torture is a common indicator that the child will be violent in the future. Also, over 30 percent of murderers use killing as a way for their sexual arousal (Stone). A murderer
Serial murders are not just part of the United States they also happen globally. There are many investigative tools that are used when working a serial murder case and we will discuss some of those. We will also discuss the problems with the media when it comes to serial murders. We will also talk about how the criticism of the public and media can affect serial murder cases.
Serial murder is one of the most baffling crimes that occur in the U.S. and all over the world. Knight (2006) defines serial murder as the killing of three or more people over a period of more than 30 days, with a significant cooling-off period. The cooling off period may be weeks, months or even years long. Researchers have proposed various psychological, biological and sociological theories that offer a partial understanding of the nature of serial murder. Some propose that the basis for criminal behavior is a predisposition to violence as well as a mix between environment, personality traits and biological factors. Serial killers are predominantly male. Only 3 percent of serial murders are committed by women (U.S. News and World Report,
Serial killers represent a social problem in many ways. Many innocent lives are taken away by these serial killers. We as a society should care if serial killers or spree killers operate within our culture because we never know that we or a family member could be next on the list. People’s lives are taken away by these criminals; people who have a whole life ahead
Throughout American history, numerous acts of crime have been committed by serial killers that ultimately shocked the nation. A serial killer is defined as “someone who murders more than three victims one at a time in a relatively short interval (Serial).” One particular person who is considered one of the most infamous serial killers on earth is Jeffrey Dahmer. The Jeffrey Dahmer case had a significant impact on not only society but on the criminal justice system as well.
Murder, willingly taking another human's life, is considered a heinous crime in the United States, and from the sociological perspective, breaks an important more. Serial Murder, therefore, is a sociologically deviant phenomenon where a person kills two or more people in distinct events, and an FBI overview of serial killers states “No single cause, trait, or even a group of traits can differentiate or identify serial killers … from other types of violent offenders” (FBI). We can, however, use sociological perspectives to identify potential factors in these cases. As a boy, Jeffrey Dahmer was described as being a loner and a poor student- and had been sexually abused by a neighbor. He is homosexual, and all of his victims were males- which
In the essay “What Makes a Serial Killer?” author LaDonna Beaty discusses the causes of serial killers. Beaty states, serial killers are the most hated and feared out of all the criminals. Over 5000 people will be victimized each year by serial killers alone, says Beaty. Her research estimates there are 350 serial killers within a large society. Beaty stated that investigations on serial killers had been dated back to 1911. However, she also asks, what does a serial killer look like? Beaty gives the readers great details on her ideal serial killer. For example, he will typically have bloodshot eyes, curly black hair, strong jaws, abnormal ears, straight thin lips, and menacing grins. Although, today, we can’t expect serial killers to have
Richard Ramirez is an infamous serial murderer who terrorized Los Angeles, California in 1985. The media gave him the name the “Night Stalker” when he was on his vicious rampage of forcing himself into the homes of his victims late at night and committing his heinous crimes. Though he was only convicted of thirteen murders, he had many more victims. His crimes were so random, disorganized, and impulsive that the law enforcement officials of Los Angeles had no luck finding Ramirez for months as he grew increasingly more violent. (Tripod.com, 2012) Finally, in August of 1985, the police had enough information from many of his victims to release a sketch of him to the media. The sketch had only been on the news for one
Due to today’s advanced media technology, we as a society are more aware and instantly informed about mass murders and serial killers. There is a difference between a mass murderer and a serial killer, according to the U.S. Department of Justice, statistics Bureau. (“Mental Floss”, 2008). A “mass
The stereotype that exists for individuals who commit serial murder is one that mainly includes males of a specific race. However, it is now known that white males are not the only individuals who commit serial murder. Men and women from all racial and ethnic backgrounds and socio-economic statuses have been found to be serial murderers. Although this information has been presented to society, the cultural schema of the white male serial killer is still prevalent. The assumptions that involve serial murderers often include two aspects, the serial murderer is male and the serial murder is a type of “lust murder”, often involving sexual crimes by a sadist (Keeney and Heide, 1995). Keeney and Heide (1994) define serial murder to be the
According to Wikipedia, serial killing could be defined as the unlawful encounters of more than two victims by the same person over a period of more than 30 days. It’s a term that American society has become quite familiar with. Basically a serial Killer’s motivation for assassinating is typically based on psychological satisfaction. Most people do not understand what causes a person wants to murder people without having a reason behind it, besides gaining such pleasure. In the past thirty years, there were numerous serial killers having all horrific and filthy ways to eliminate victims including raping, poisoning, burning, drinking their blood etc.
What is a serial killer? Retired Special Agent Robert Ressler, a twenty-two year veteran of the FBI’s Behavioral Sciences Unit in Quantico, Virginia, is responsible for creating the term “serial killer.” He defines this person as “one who commits a series of murders, usually three or more, the victims most often being strangers, and usually with a cooling-off period in between each kill” (Kelleher & Kelleher, 1998; Pearson, 1998; Ressler and Shactman, 1997). This precise definition is necessary to distinguish this type of predator from the mass murderer (who kills many simultaneously), mercenaries, war criminals, or mafia hit men.
To begin, serial killers are those who commit a series of murders usually without no motive during extended periods of times. In addition, serial killers are also known to commit their murders in a pattern. To society these people are usually referred to as “monsters”, and they believe that these kinds of individuals should be given the worse punishment. Not to mention, society has different opinions on whether serial killers should be given capital punishment or if they should be given a sentence to life in prison, without the possibility of parole. In my opinion, I believe that serial killers should not be given the death penalty. I believe that anyone who can commit murders obviously has mental problems. Serial
But countless people tried to send the message that we were not allowed to have ugly feelings over this, because of where that may lead. Our anger is too dangerous and must be quelled. Because to hell with the women who were attacked or injured, who will carry the scars for the rest of their lives. To hell with the women who have been kept in the dark about a "new dimension of crime" which is a very real threat to their safety. Feelings of the non-victims in this story somehow became the priority.
“If the newspapers of a country are filled with good news, the jails of that country will be filled with good people” (What). This journalist quote, by Daniel Moynihan, means that there are going to be times when news stories are devastating, gruesome, and tragic. News stories resembling that are inevitable and can leave a city, county, state, country, or even the world in shock. When the media, such as newspapers, radio, and television, reports these types of stories, however, the public seems to think they go overkill, at times, on the images or videos they show to them. At the same time, the media is trying to show the public what exactly is happening and wants them to understand what the victims are facing. This creates a fine line that the media wants to get as close to it as possible without crossing it and causing outrage and anger from the people. Did the media go too far in publishing disturbing images or videos in a devastating story or did the people overreact?