Trigger warnings, these two words are more often than not, associated with the internet, or any type of online media, but lately it has been bustling its way into reality. To put more on your plate, specifically college life is where the spotlight is at, and the professors are not too short from the issue with these warnings. Professors should not include trigger warnings for potentially challenging material in their classes on the grounds that it will only keep students from preparing how to deal with such situations in and out of the classroom. It is part of the learning experience in college. Everyone has their own definition on what trigger warning means, let alone how it is or should be applied. I believe it could be applied to …show more content…
It could be a popular opinion you post on your account and if it is not properly tagged, it is most likely that a few users will be offended and send a awful amount of hateful messages until you correctly tag what you had written and posted for the whole internet to see. Particularly, I had been attacked over posting a picture of a blue flower, in which case, it triggered someone because it reminded them of a negative event that they rather not remember. I do not think that the sensitivity could be described as extreme, but something much more. The users of this site are often viewed in the negative light for the excess use of these trigger warnings.
As explained before, trigger warnings can be applied to many things, and some of those things can be just absurd, referring back to my opinion that professors should not use trigger warnings for challenging material it is as such. It should not be a requirement that these teachers need to introduce a trigger warning before class or any assignment. They should not fear for their job cause a student claimed they were inconsiderate of how they felt. This is part of the learning experience, and in college you are an adult, and you can not be protected from subjects outside the classroom. Life is triggering, the classroom does not escape it either. Students that see a day without these warnings negatively do not see it in a positive light, period. They simply do not want to try, cause they
The purpose of my research is to explore and offer analysis of the controversy over the use of trigger warnings and safe spaces on college campuses, in order to understand when, where, and most importantly, regarding what subjects their use is appropriate.
Roxane Gay’s persuasive essay, “The Illusion of Safety/The Safety of Illusion” is about trigger warnings in the media. Her argument in the essay is that trigger warnings in the media give a false sense of security to the people the warnings seek to shield. She explains how trigger warnings are futile because you cannot protect someone from their own self. She also proposes that as time goes on anything can have the potential to become a trigger to someone.
As a class, we mainly fell into the category of those who would not tell a professor if they had any concerns regarding a class. The standard here with the usage of trigger warnings is how do we as a society know what actually will require a trigger warning. If no one has a standard, then the policy would be mocked for being too lackadaisical. I see trigger warnings being necessary in some situations where I would want to know if something graphic is going to be shown to me. We came across two definitions of safe spaces in the class: 1) an actual physical safe space and 2) an ideological safe space. The concern with the physical safe space is that it seems more reductive or childish, which interestingly enough is how the Baby Boomers assess our generation.
After reading the article I concur with the author’s views on colleges coddling students who are offended by words or small actions is doing more harm than good. The article covered the issues in detail and gave many examples of the conception before the 1980’s when children could roam free in the world with less worry for parents to where next generation who had more protective parents because of the increase of kidnappings, removal of physical activities in school, school shootings, and bullying after the 1980’s.The authors discuss how coddling is not good for students, society, the workplace, government or the future. Coddling removes cognitive thinking and the use of good critical thinking skills. Coddling will force students to think with emotion instead of logic. Society will not always bend over backwards to appease ones feelings or change to make someone feel comfortable. Thinking with emotions can create a fog that can hinder ones view of reality.
The Oxford dictionary defines trigger warnings as a statement at the start of a piece of writing, video, etc., that alerts the reader or viewer that a material contains potentially distressing material. Trigger warnings were originally intended for war veteran, who returned to their homes with PTSD. The use of trigger warnings has changed in the past few years because they have begun to make a big impact on college campuses. Today the use of trigger warnings in a university class is considered a controversial topic. There are many who argue that professors should be required to issue trigger warnings for their classes, however, the topic of trigger warning is ambiguous and many oppose the use of trigger warnings in a university setting.
In this article, they view trigger warnings as a way of students avoiding issues that may cause them discomfort. Manne describes the idea of trigger warnings as a way to “flag content that depicted or discussed common causes of trauma, like military combat, child abuse, incest and sexual violence.” However, she says that the purpose of trigger warnings are slightly different at schools and universities. The warnings are meant to prepare students instead of bombarding them with possible triggering material. This way each student can learn instead of experiencing a panic attack which makes it “impossible to think straight.”
“A movement is arising, undirected and driven largely by students, to scrub campuses clean of words, ideas, and subjects that might cause discomfort or give offense” (Lukianoff and Haidt 44). Colleges are sheltering their students from words and ideas that students do not like or are found to be offensive. Affecting their education and cognitive skills, scientists are warning colleges to refrain from coddling the students and allowing other viewpoints to be spoken. People are speaking their minds, saying their own views; however, some people are over sensitive and take these viewpoints offensively. In the article “The Coddling of the American Mind,” Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt successfully argues using rhetorical questions, specific examples, and affective visuals that protecting college students from words and ideas deteriorates their education and mental health.
I side with the argument that people should use trigger warning for an upcoming topic. Students do go to college to learn and given that there stressors that go along with college, giving a trigger warning is not bad at all. This serves as a reminder that people do care about whatever situation that the student that is affected is going through. This gives the student anonymity and a environment that does not have to keep the student in isolation because of the traumatic event. While both sides make a good case for their argument, it does not hurt to show respect for
Trigger words are common-throughout anyone’s daily life. Imagine this, an elderly women loses her husband of fifty years. The man kept a four leaf clover in his pocket at all times for good luck. Did the world completely eliminate four leaf clovers from the world to accommodate her loss? No, not at all— the elderly women had to mentally prepare herself to handle the mental distress that could come. Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt in wrote an article in September of 2015 titled, “The Coddling of the American Mind.” This article covers overall mental health mostly in American college students. The students demand security from words and ideas that are uncomfortable in the learning environment. Lukianoff and Haidt cover every aspect concerning the views through the students, therapist, professors, and even the general public. There is a serious epidemic of micro-aggressions, trigger words, and an over-use of vindictive protectiveness. The two author’s ideals stated within are realistic, however, getting to the conclusion is a bit hectic and spastically placed throughout.
Trigger warnings are hurting mental health on campus according to Lukianoff and Haidt. For instance, Lukianoff and Haidt say that critical thinking involves students to question their own unexamined beliefs and sometimes the questioning can lead to discomfort, but this leads a way to understand. Clearly, we do not like to be put in awkward situations, but in reality, that is what has to be done, in order to learn and experience. Additionally, “Students with PTSD should of course get treatment, but they should not try to avoid normal life, with its many opportunities
Triger Warnings: Effect on Medicine Students and Career It can be overwhelming being a student in addition being a student who experiences life with fear, but should this fear take away from others? In “The Coddling of the American Mind” by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, discussed trigger warnings across universities as a movement in rising by students being per say fragile and wanting to be shielded by requesting certain topics they find offensive to be removed from being addressed in class. As a student of medicine, I expect to get the most realist learning and training as I will be dealing at times with life and death situations, which will require me to be prepare to address them in the most professional way possible.
Another reason trigger warnings should not be on the syllabus is professors have no idea what is a trigger for a student. In theory, anything could be a trigger. Jarvie shows the ridiculousness that is trigger warning by saying, “…alerts have been applied to topics as diverse as sex, addition, bullying… and animals in wigs” (Jarvie 3). This demonstrates that a trigger could be anything to a person with PTSD. It is nearly impossible to know what the person’s triggers are and be able to protect every student from their triggers. As Jarvie
In Lindsay Holmes’s article “A Quick Lesson on What Trigger Warnings Actually Do,” she states that trigger warnings are misinterpreted cautions notifying whether or not a discussion could cause emotional distress, and often are not implemented for this reason. Holmes begins by recounting when the University of Chicago announced they would not be focusing on Trigger Warnings or safe places; although the university later tells expresses that their initial statement was misinterpreted, the author uses this to open the discussion on the importance of trigger warnings.
However, others argue that trigger warnings should
Trigger warnings, a label made to help those with every type of PTSD, do not help and are not needed in literary topics. Trigger warnings are not needed in literacy because most people see them as annoyances do to the fact that they a directed at a small part of the population and doesn’t really apply to most of the population. Also they aren’t that easy to place, almost anything could trigger anyone at anytime by any topic without anyone knowing beforehand what to expect. Finally even though they were made to help mostly people with PTSD, but when they see the labels they will most likely avoid those topics and avoiding “trigger topics” is actually a symptom of PTSD.