Martrez Reynolds eng. 1101 mr. Ogletree, Randy
Juveniles: Should they be tried as adults? Should juveniles be tried as adults? Here is a topic that is being reflected by several people across some years. In the following of my research paper, I wish to discuss my standpoint on juveniles being tried as adults. In which in selected situations I feel that the juvenile should get punished for the crime that they committed, but it should not be to the extent of an adult’s punishment. The holy bible states that “when I was a kid I thought and acted like a kid, but when I became an adult I put away childish things. weegy.com states that:"Under most state laws, juvenile offenders do not commit "crimes." They commit delinquent acts. Some of
…show more content…
The juvenile justice system is extensive and complicated in several parts, and its processes and components vary considerably from State to State. In this system, some juvenile cases get assigned to adult criminal courts by means of a process called a “waiver.”
There are many productive and negative advantages of the juvenile being tried in an adult court."Minors possess the right to a jury trial in adult court even though in most states don't grant a right to a jury in juvenile court. Juries in the adult court system may be more considerate to the juveniles." (citation needed) In some jurisdictions where dockets and jails are crowded, the court may be inclined to dispose of the juvenile's case more quickly and impose a lighter sentence.
There are also some disadvantages of youths being tried as adults. For example, it’s possible that the juvenile may have to serve an enhanced sentence, including life sentences, are is more than likely the max if convicted in the adult system. The minor, nine out of ten times if the juvenile is wavered over to the adult system, they are convicted of that particular crime. Judges in adult court systems have a limited range of options of punishments and treatment; while, on the other hand, Justices from the juvenile judicial system do.Requiring a curfew or systemization counseling alternatively of serving jail
…show more content…
I fill that for no reason should a young have to with do such punishment that saved. They are juveniles, not adults so why try them as if they are.
Reason number four, a conviction in adult criminal court carries more social stigma than a juvenile court decision makes adult criminal records are harder to seal than juvenile court records -- sealing,"
Many people argue that if a juvenile can commit an adult crime that they should face an adult system and serve adult time. But I on those other hands don't think so, I feel that the adult system is no place for anyone under 17 because most of the minds are not that mature and might become easily influenced. Not saying that they shouldn't get punished to the extent of the crime they've committed, they should, however not to the magnitude of the adult system. As you can see from the research, there are many approaches to this particular situation, whether it's good or wrong; I feel that we need to come up with a desirable solution
Whether or not we should try juveniles as adults has always been a controversial issue. First of all, “juveniles” are children who fall under the age of 18. However, the legal age varies within certain states across the USA. Despite the age difference, some juveniles are still tried as adults. Does convicting a juvenile as an adult, turn out to be a better problem-solver, and how is this affecting the deterrence of crime?
By trying juveniles in the adult courts they are forcing them to accept a punishment that does not allow for the nurturing and growth that they need. Putting them in with other adult criminals only makes them more likely to commit severe crimes in the future. Judge Dorn has this
If we simply send juveniles through the adult justice system it might make them worse individuals. For instance, since their minds are still growing, by being around worse criminals they may pick on their criminal traits.
There are times juveniles should not be convicted as adults because sometimes the “crimes” may not harsh enough to be charged as an adult. For example, if a 8 year old saw a gun in their mother's purse and thought it was a toy and grabbed it and began to shoot who would be at fault ? Plus children in adult prisons are 10 times more likely to be taken advantage of in their time. Research shows that children prosecuted in the adult criminal justice system are more likely to reoffend than those held in the juvenile justice
Nowadays, the topic of the Juvenile law system is a very controversial as well as difficult discussion to have. For every court case, trial, and scenario, there are many different circumstances that may affect the outcome. Due to the seriousness of their crimes or even their past offenses, juvenile criminals can sometimes be tried as adults. Personally, in the beginning of this assignment, I could see both sides of the argument. There are many reasons why children under the age of 18 should be tried as children, however, there are more proficient reasons as to why we should do away with juvenile court. Many of my peers do not think this, however, they are keen on keeping children tried as children. I truly cannot fathom the “good” that
As a contrast, there are many differences between the adult and juvenile justice system. These differences consist of the right to a jury, the right to post bail, leniency of evidence, different court proceedings, the right to a public trial, and rehabilitation efforts. As for the purpose of this paper, we will dissect the differences of the two systems. Many appeals have been filed under the notion that a right to a jury should be upheld for juvenile offenders. The courts have voted against this action time and time again. These appeals are made on the assumption that, as noted earlier, adult crimes should be tried as adult crimes. However, the court rules on this matter while keeping the rehabilitation efforts of the juvenile courts in mind, as opposed to the more punitive measures. Their desire to see kids treated as kids are defined with their upholding of the law, and pushing rehabilitation to its max. But should rehabilitation be the prime focus when the act is of adult capacity; even in a child’s body? I do not think so. What are the percentages of rehabilitation success with adults for committed capital offenses? How are they going to differ when a child partakes in them? I think there is a
If adult and juvenile case procedures were the same many juveniles would have criminal records going into adulthood for minor offenses or even just mistakes in judgment that could affect his or her future. Adults have a better understanding of the laws and what is right and wrong in addition the consequences of their choices than juveniles do.
There are times where a juvenile may be eligible for transfer to adult criminal court. There are certain criteria that must be met for this to happen, and there is a strong belief that juveniles who commit serious offenses would be more appropriately dealt with by criminal (or adult) courts (Elrod & Ryder, 2011). Juveniles are capable of committing the same serious offenses that adults do. Therefore, with the requirements of a transfer being met, there are times that juveniles should be placed in the adult criminal court system and tried through here, rather than the juvenile court system. The juvenile court system may not have the same consequences or sentencing guidelines as the adult criminal court; therefore, the proper punishment may
In today society there are many juveniles being sent to adult court for the crimes they committed. When a juvenile is sent to criminal court the juvenile can more likely be found guilty and receive harsher punishment than the adults that commits the same crime and any juvenile that is convicted and sentenced in juvenile court. Depending on which State the juvenile is located in depends on if the juvenile is automatically will be sent to criminal court. The question remains is should a juvenile be transferred to adult courts for the crime that has been committed? The juvenile might not be mature enough to understand the crime they committed, have psychologic issues or any other underlying issues for when the crime was committed. The age
In the recent years, cases of juvenile crimes have been decreasing to its lower rates since the 1980’s which is good. However, there are still plenty of juvenile crimes happening. There has been a big debate going on about whether juveniles should be tried as adults or juveniles, and things just keep getting more and more out of hand. Juveniles are being tried as adults and that is unacceptable. Juveniles should not be tried in adult courts regardless of their crime because they are simply not prepared to handle all the pressure and the problems that will cause them being sent to adult prison.
Many of those who are in favor of prosecuting juveniles as adults believe that the juvenile justice system is too relaxed. Therefore, they believe that juvenile offenders don’t recognize the seriousness of their crime. But should the punishment
As adolescents, we have all made mistakes, some big some small but it never crossed our minds that one of these mistakes could change our lives forever. In this day in age, it's ludicrous to hear youth suspects receive harsh sentencing; being forced to go to an adult jail or prison, or in rare cases getting put on death row. “The practice of charging young people as adults gained momentum in America in the 1990s, as youth crime spiked” ("Children in Adult Jails"). Some argue that these pre-teens and/or teens should receive harsh sentencing regardless of their age because they were old enough to know right from wrong. Others believe juveniles should be tried as adults in certain circumstances, depending on the crime and its severity. On the other hand, many people believe youth offenders should receive a higher juvenile sentence as opposed to an adult sentence. This
This paper takes a brief look at the history and evolution of the juvenile justice system in the United States. In recent years there has been an increase of juvenile cases being transferred into the adult court system. This paper will also look at that process and the consequences of that trend.
Imagine sitting in a courtroom, hoping the the judge will not give a harsh sentence. Unfortunately, that’s the case for many juveniles, some as young as 13! A juvenile is subject to a more severe sentence with the limited sentencing available. It is estimated that 250,000 youth are prosecuted as adults, each year. This number should change, as juveniles are not adults, both mentally and physically. Juveniles need an environment surrounded with guiding adults, education and the resources to help them. A juvenile is not an adult, and should not be tried as one.
Should juveniles get adult jail sentences? In today's society juvenile offenders are facing the law to full force, in two court systems. Not only are they tried in the juvenile justice system, but also charged as adults. The issue of charging juveniles as adults has stirred various views owing to the violent crimes committed by the young offenders. Politicians comment that the best solution is to lock up juvenile offenders for a long time and ignore rehabilitation. However, prior researches on the topic of juvenile delinquencies suggest that trying young offenders in the adult legal system and putting them in adult prisons will only lead to increased crime, higher costs, and increased violence(John & Jiangmin 568).