Should Police Officers Wear Body Cameras

Requiring police forces to wear body cameras imply that they will be on their personal being and turned on throughout their entire shift. Their work-time will be recorded in its entirety and if an incident occurs, the police station can look back on the video surveillance for evidence. This is ideally meant to improve the behavior of our armed forces and those they encounter, as well as providing us extra information.

In conclusion, body cameras should be used by all police officers, because they help police and citizens behave better, they help court cases, and they can justify the use of lethal force. In America it should be mandatory for every police officer to have some kind of surveillance filming them on the job to help keep us citizens safe, and keep our police

I think that police officers should be able to be required to use an body camera. I believe that police officers should be able to use body cameras because they can view the video of footage of their encounters before writing there incident reports. Also they can encode and retain of the countless details that make up a use of force incident.

I think that cops should have body camera because they need it just in care they be in the wrong or the victim be in the wrong.If they dont have them they could like be in something that there boss can say so what happen and they cant tell what happen really happen like they start to lie

Should police officers wear body cameras? I believe that police officers should wear body cameras so that we can have more trust in police officers, and we could also decrease the citizens criticism on the officer's honesty.

To begin with, police should wear body cameras to decrease bad behavior and increase good behavior. Body cameras show that police and respondents are less likely to use violence because the police officers know that they are on recording. Infact sources show that there has

Over the past years, the public and police have not seen eye to eye. Recently, lots of disputes between the police and public have been occurring because there is confusion between their view points. A simple solution for this problem is having police use body cameras so that the public may feel safer knowing that when interacting with police, it is being recorded and can be looked back on in future situations, if needed.

There has surfaced in America today a problem that surprises many people, dishonesty. Many people cannot be trusted to tell the authorities of their activities, and they lie in court under oath. This has become a serious problem, and our police force has found a unique way to stop it. Body worn cameras for police officers on duty are that proposed solution. This technology makes it easier to determine what happened in a particular situation. Body worn police cameras help people to be more honest, have better behavior patterns, as well as keeping the officers who wear them accountable.

Some Police Officers have done more than just help or save people. Many studies have shown that some cops are more likely to hurt someone then protect them. A University of Cambridge study showed that if police officers wear body cameras, the respondent and the officer are more likely not to use violence. The study indicated that more than 50 percent of violence decreased once they wore cameras. Police Officers would be held countable for their inappropriate and appropriate contact, and the Local Governments would not need evidence to find out if the Police Officer did right or wrong. Body cameras would make the streets safer, as well as the officers and the public.

Do you think police officers need body cams and dashboard cams on them?If not, Imagine you're walking to the store by yourself.A disturbance happened in the store,so the police was called.The police asks you questions and you get quite smart and rude with them.They ask you for some identification to identify who you are,and you reach in your pockets to get them.The next thing you know the gun be will drown out and they will shoot you most likely kill you and guess what there is no evidence because its your word against there's and most likely they will believe them because there is no proof saying that they shot you.Now do you think they need cameras on them at all times.Cause others may think differently.

One is that of the camera’s vision. It is set in 2D so depth perception can be different compared to what you can really see with your own eyes. Thus, when reviewing the video, there can be misinterpretations of the level of threat an officer was facing. Or, if there’s a heated situation where an officer holds out their firearm, there’s a good chance that he is blocking the camera’s view with his arms and hands. Leaving the third party to decide on what he/she hears and what they saw before and after such action; in addition to what the officer and witnesses have to say. Then there is the camera’s speed, the cameras depiction of action and reaction times. On a special report called, “10 limitations of body cams you need to know for your protection” by Dr. Bill Lewinski, the executive director of the Force Science Institute, says, “Because of the reactionary curve, an officer can be half a second or more behind the action as it unfolds on the screen. Whether he’s shooting or stopping shooting, his recognition, decision-making, and physical activation all take time—but obviously can’t be shown on camera. People who don’t understand this reactionary process won’t factor it in when viewing the footage. They’ll think the officer is keeping pace with the speed of the action as the camera records it. So without knowledgeable input, they aren’t likely to understand how an officer can unintentionally end up placing rounds in a suspect’s back or firing additional shots after a threat has ended.” Overall, saying that if we do use body cameras while on duty, there will still be drawbacks with the camera itself like perception and speed, even if the money gets covered and privacy issues are dealt with. Now let me ask you again, is seeing still

Ever wondered when police brutality is going what a Police Officer is thinking who is watching and why is happening. Police officers should be required to use body cameras because it will reduce the force in police officers, cameras will also make citizens feel safe and, to avoid bias views. But police officers be required to use body cameras because it can lead to distrust.

The need for police officers to be equipped with body cameras while on duty is crucial in rebuilding community relations and increasing police accountability. As such, there are various benefits and consequences in the implementation of this proposed policy for all police departments. While benefits include lowering rates of police misconduct, increased accountability and transparency, improved officer training, providing effective evidence for trials and reduction of civilian complaints, there are consequences such as the upfront cost of police cameras, legal and privacy concerns and reliability of body camera footage. The adoption of police body cameras has both positive and negative merits

Police officers aren’t high schoolers, they have strictly enforced laws about privacy. They aren’t allowed, without authorization of the sheriff, to reveal that recorded information. On the flip side, these could make officers and suspects interact better at traffic stops or calls, because who is going to want recorded proof of them resisting arrest or breaking the law? Not many. Being in a family with a dad and grandpa as police officers, sending them out on calls is the scariest thing I’ve had to do. As a family most of our free time is spent listening to the dispatch radio to see what they have to deal with. Body cameras would help bring a sense of comfort to families with officers, knowing that if something would happen to them that there is evidence of everything that happened. A lot of departments claim that the cost is huge factor, which is understandable for cities like LA or Chicago or even Fort Wayne. A lot of people don’t realize how many officers some cities have, for example, Fort Wayne has approximately 1,800 officers (Garry Hamilton, FWPD Chief). If a camera is $300, that’s $540,000; that’s fourteen brand new 2016 Dodge Chargers (standard issued patrol car). In reality, who wouldn’t go with the new patrol cars? Some cities, like Fort Wayne, still have the basic 2002 Ford Interceptors, which are starting to get outran by

Police men and women should have to wear a camera and microphone. A lot of things happen that can question a police investigation. A police officer could go overboard on a suspect or criminal and get away with it. Also a criminal may harm a police officer and the footage could help get them. Maybe even catching the officer taking a bribe or anything else they are not supposed to be doing. Personally I feel like it would be safer with cops having a microphone and camera. Police officers make mistakes all the time and don’t get caught. The police officers wearing the camera and microphones will make the streets better for everyone.