D ivus Julius is the god to which Julius Caesar was elevated to, after his death. In recent years, scholars (Kavoukopoulos, Cliteur, Carotta) have hypothesized the possibility of Jesus Christ being the historical figure of Divus Julius. There is a plethora of similarities and congruencies in the lives of the two individuals. These include the similar timeline which the two follow, as well as the fact that the people in these timelines are structurally the same, even by name and location. Further, their passions and posthumous fate are astonishingly alike when juxtaposed and connected. They also seem to have similar characters and personal charismas which help us merge the image of the two into one. These similarities may provide …show more content…
They are both excellent speakers and descendants of prestigious families; David and the Trojan hero and founder of Rome, Aeneas. Despite their background, they both are intelligent and make a name for themselves through their own work. They undergo difficulties and eventually, each has a victorious entry; Jesus on a donkey and Caesar on a horse. Their policies are also similar as they gain the support of the masses, yet, they are judged as wrongdoers by the authorities; Jesus by the Sanhedrin and Caesar by the …show more content…
We think this inspite the following Biblical verse: 'But whoever denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father in heaven. Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn ‘A man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. - Matthew, 10:34 Thus, Jesus rewards those who help his people and his cause. Clearly, these conditions are not at all peacefull, but rather war-like. He brings about the Kindom of God with violent meanseven if he did not want such methods to be used- just like Caesar
Throughout history, great leaders had been forged through all different kinds of societies and their needs. In this case, Donald Trump and Julius Caesar are no less. Both leaders had fought against their rivals to become leader. Donald Trump had run for president of the United States of America in 2016 and had fought vigorously against his political opponents to win the election. Julius Caesar had been part of a triumvirate, or a group of three leaders. When one of the leaders started dominating the others and oppressed Caesar, Caesar had retaliated and seized control of the Roman Empire. Both Donald Trump and Julius Caesar are similar because both had believed what they were doing was for the better of their followers, had been targeted by
In the determination of whether Julius Caesar was an intelligent, political hero or an egocentric, dictating villain, it is important to look at all of the facts. Born in 100 B.C.E. and assassinated in 44 B.C.E., Julius Caesar was legendary. He along Pompey, and Crassus created the first unofficial Triumvirate which was negotiated to appease both the Roman citizens and the power hungry rivals. Still, this agreement would not last long. After Pompey’s wife, Julia Caesar and daughter of Caesar’s daughter given to Pompey to establish the Trimvirate, dies in childbirth, civil war breaks out as Caesar leads his army against Rome. He fights until Pompey is murdered in Egypt. As Rome is “shattered,” Julius Caesar one person should rule. He
The saddest thing about betrayal is that the pain never comes from your enemies.” This statement runs true for both pieces of literature, Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and John Knowles’ A Separate Peace. Julius Caesar is a self titled play about Julius Caesar’s descent from power. The climax of the play is when Caesar’s best friend, Brutus, stabs and kills him before he can be crowned king. Caesar was truly defeated when he saw that his illegitimate son was the one that struck him down. Similarly, the book A Separate Peace is about two best friends, Gene and Phineas, growing up at a prep school during World War Two. The conflict of the story is when Gene jounces Phineas off of a tree, effectively breaking his leg. “Holding firmly to the trunk,
In conclusion, Marc Antony, Brutus and Cassius differ greatly in personality and leadership. Marc Antony and Cassius’ scheming made them successful, but each lacked integrity. Marc
Julius Caesar and William Shakespeare, if mentioned the only connection would be that of the play that Shakespeare composed regarding the iconic, and historical character, of Julius Caesar. In spite of the truth behind this, there is much more in common between the writer and the Roman emperor that what is on the surface; given of course the time period in which both lived and the different, yet similar, ways both rose to historical fame. Such can be said due to the fact that within both presentations of Julius Caesar and William Shakespeare's professional careers, and/or lives, there were clear instances in which the similarities between these two people were uncanny, such as the manner of rising to power, and the impact that was made on society
Although both men were zealous in pursuit, the way they individually expressed ambition opposed one another. Marc Antony acted out of revenge as well as a power surge from finally being given the chance to usurp Caesar’s sovereignty, where as Cassius functioned simply by wanting what was most beneficial to the Empire. After years of standing second to Caesar, Marc Antony’s yearning to one day become a ruler such as precedent prompted him to co-establish the second triumvirate and siege dominance for himself.
“Violence does, in truth, recoil upon the violent, and the schemer falls into the pit which he digs for another” (Doyle). Assassinations have taken place countless times throughout history. Anyone can get assassinated, but political leaders have to worry the most since so many leaders have been killed in the past. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Brutus and Cassius (along with the other conspirators) murder Julius Caesar. Although this is just a play, it is very relevant to real life. One situation similar to this Is the JFK assassination. Both situations (Caesar and JFK) are similar in that someone was killed, and it ended poorly for the assassin(s).
Let us take a look into the past as we glance at the similarities and differences between Caesar and Hitler. Ambition, abuse of power, and honor are the three elements that separate two ambitious men with great power. These two great leaders show the same characteristics, but showed them in a different way. Caesar was a man of action, and Hitler was a man of his words.
Abraham Lincoln and Julius Caesar are two historical figures known not only for their leadership, but their assassinations as well. Although their deaths may seem cruel, their killers had sincere motives. John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln’s killer, and Marcus Brutus, one of Caesar’s murderers, wanted what was best for their people. Booth and Brutus both have similar opinions on the subject of tyranny. The two showed alike beliefs and demonstrated them through their actions but differ on the topic of political ambition.
Julius Caesar is thought of as the most powerful and glorious ruler to step foot in Rome. The only thing
Comparative Essay: Julius Caesar vs Malcom X In this comparative essay I will explore and discuss the leadership and lifestyle of Julius Caesar and Malcom Little (Malcom X) discussing similarities and differences. Both men have greatly influence the political landscape within their perspective societies, however, at different eras. Julius Caesar has been hailed as one of the greatest political and military leader having brought an end to the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. Malcom X on the other hand fought for an end to racial discrimination and civil rights for African Americans in the United States of America.
Julius Caesar was one of the greatest rulers in the ancient world. Most people don’t believe this because the senate made Caesar seem like a bad person even though he wasn’t. He helped the people of Rome and his allies. When Rome was in ruins he helped rebuilt it to make it better. He even gave the poor new lives overseas. People always focused on his wrong doings instead of his good deeds. The senator’s undying jealousy for Caesar caused him many problems and made him misunderstood. He was the true savior of Rome.
The famous story of Caesar’s rise to power and the opposition he faces from his so called friends and allies, Julius Caesar is another prominent
Julius Caesar, a man born in around 12 to 13, 100 BC, was considered the start of a new legacy in the history of Rome. Participating in several wars, becoming dictator after forming multiple military alliances, to being assassinated on the Ides of March, Julius Caesar was a politically-flexible, popular leader of the Roman Empire. (Julius Caesar Biography, April 23, 2014) Although Caesar’s birth was never confirmed on the exact date, he was born and raised by his mother, Aurelia, and by his father, Gaius Julius Caesar. (Julius Caesar: Historical Background, April 23, 2014)
Julius Caesar and Brutus are more similar than meets the eye. One could argue that both Julius and Brutus are tragic heroes in the tragic play Julius Caesar. This argument is false because Brutus is the one, and only, tragic hero. Brutus is the tragic hero because he possesses the heroic qualities of equality and respect, integrity, and concern for his county, as well as possessing a tragic flaw, which is his own naivety. Heroic qualities can be hard to define, but to simply put it, they are the defining qualities and famed features that define a conqueror. These beliefs often tell the customs and beliefs of the society the hero is from, because this is the way of life for the tragic hero. Every tragic also embeds himself with a tragic flaw. The tragic flaw is the one negative and shameful character trait found throughout that the character just cannot quite seem to control and will lead to their demise, no doubt about it.