“Sinners in the hands of an angry God” and “Upon the burning of our house” are both puritan writings and are from the 1600’s. However they use two different writings styles to convey the same general message about God. These two pieces are very different writing styles with one being a sermon and one being a poem. Although “Sinners in the hands of an angry God” uses a sermon to convey the message but a message may be hidden in both. “Sinners in the hands of an angry God” Is an example of a sermon and “Upon the burning of our house” is a poem for example (In silent night when rest I took for sorrow near I did not look) this shows the basic form of poem writing portrayed by the author. In “Sinners in the hands of an angry God” and “Upon the
In the sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”, Edwards displays controversial viewpoints and ideas concerning heaven and hell. As Edwards speaks to the congregation he warns them of the misery and suffering they will face if they do not repent of certain sins. He also describes God as angry which probably struck fear into the hearts on many. To illustrate his own point that hell is unenviable without repentance Jonathan Edwards creates the idea of an angry God using intense similes, a harsh tone, and strong emotional appeal in “Sinners in the hand of an Angry God”.
The great awakening was a religion revival that occurred in the 1730s and 1740s. It started in England and then gradually made its way over to the Americans colonies. During this time, many different preacher and religious speaker went around and gave speeches to the people. Jonathan Edwards was one ofs2xwds those speakers. He wrote “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” during this period and eloquently delivered to his fellow churchman. In his sermon, he focused on the consequences of leading a sinful life, the power of god and repenting of ones sins in order to be saved from the hell. The purpose behind this piece of writing was to depict to people the extent to which God helps them, as well as the extent to which they could be punished for not following his commands. This piece was aimed at those who lacked belief in God as well as churches. In order to be persuasive, Edwards’s uses figurative language like imagery, similes, repetition, metaphor and rhetorical questions to emphasize the severity
Jonathan Edwards's sermon, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" is moving and powerful. His effectiveness as an eighteenth century New England religious leader is rooted in his expansive knowledge of the Bible and human nature, as well as a genuine desire to "awaken" and save as many souls as possible. This sermon, delivered in 1741, exhibits Edwards's skillful use of these tools to persuade his congregation to join him in his Christian beliefs.
Many authors from the 1600’s and 1700’s base their works on religious views, but there are many differing views on God. “Upon the Burning of Our House” and “To My Dear and Loving Husband” are both by Anne Bradstreet, and are excellent writings that show half of the Puritan beliefs. The other piece is “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards that show a darker side of the Puritan ideals. The authors show what they think by using literary devices, like tone (word choice and details), or figurative language. Bradstreet believes in a God that is loving and caring, while Edwards believes in a strict, controlling God. The tone, in which they use through the stories or sermons, reflects this, and also, the figurative language that
“I’m a devil worshiper” is the very first line as Fetty Wap begins rapping in his song, “679.” In a way, this statement is very similar to Jonathan Edwards writings because both speakers had very unconventional views for their respective times. In today's world, Fetty Wap’s satanic beliefs aren’t generally accepted by other people; this is similar to Edwards views because he opposed the stereotypical loving image of God by warning others of his potential destruction and power. In, “Sinners of the Hands of an Angry God,” Jonathan Edwards makes it clearly known that he portrays God as dangerous and unafraid to take violent action through the use of imagery in nature by water, wind and insects.
Within the eighteenth century, Christians were going through the Great Awakening, a wave of religious enthusiasm that swept through the colonies in an effort to make an impact on the religion within the areas. In the sermon written by Jonathon Edwards, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” he is trying to persuade nonbelievers into joining his religion in a way unused by many. To show nonbelievers the two altering sides of God based on what people believe and “they may imagine him to be so” (3), Jonathon Edwards’ sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” utilizes threatening tone, conveying repetition, and augmenting similes to express the fury and hopefulness of God.
During the colonial era, there were many religions seeking to spread to America. Strong leaders and philosophers were able to spread their ideas through powerful sermons that captured the emotions of the audience. Jonathan Edwards, a preacher, creates a compelling and persuasive tone and diction to express God's fury very distinctly. He uses metaphors and imagery to contrast the relationship between sinners and God to those who are religious. John Winthrop, on the other hand, spoke optimistically and reassured his audience during his voyage to Arabella to demonstrate his desire for unity and a godly society within Massachusetts Bay. Both men were able to captivate their audiences through persuasive diction, tone, and style to succeed in gaining their support and trust.
Edwards' creative choice of words that he uses describes the power of God and the terrible Hell awaiting sinners. These words easily infiltrate into the minds of his congregation and frighten them beyond belief. These choices of words and his use of such vivid images are mostly successful in their intent, to scare and put fear into his audience. Edwards held his audience locked up with his promises of eternal damnation if proper steps were not taken. The congregation felt the intense impact of his rhetorical strategies and lived on the fear of the power of God. In this way, he was able to keep his followers from sin and away from the fiery pits of Hell.
Jonathan in his sermon, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God (July 8, 1741), claims that the unconverted are hanging from the hands of God, and can be dropped off to the eternity of hell, his sermon is used to make the sinners be afraid and understand how the power of God is saving them, but it is only for his pleasure, unless if they return to Christianity. Edwards strengths his argument by using metaphors and imagery of a wrathful God to make the unconverted people afraid of being sinners and encourage them to have a relationship with Christ to be fully saved from falling to an eternity in the flames of hell. Edwards purpose is to start his sermon with such powerful use of visualization to provide fear to the sinners and give them a
Jonathan Edwards author of Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God uses literary elements such as pathos, ethos, or logos to create fear in his audience to help them understand the situation he is trying to explain to them. For example, “ The Arrow is made ready”, this is aimed towards all of those who have sinned, or have not yet accepted christ, telling them the will punish them if they do not accept him and repent soon. This is meant to scare the Audience into accepting christ because no one wants an arrow unexpectedly piercing into their chests at any time of the day or night.
In "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" by Jonathan Edwards, Edward implements personification and similes to persuade his congregation into thinking that they will eventually be punished by god if they continue their sinning habits. In the sermon, Jonathan Edwards utilizes personification to describe the way god is shielding a person from their own punishments. In addition Edward states, " It is nothing but his mere pleasure that keeps you from being this moment swallowed up in everlasting destruction. " The act of destruction is being presented with a human trait which is swallowing.
Jonathan Edwards, author of “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” and Nathaniel Hawthorne, author of “The Minister’s Black Veil,” are both alike and different in many ways. Both stories refer to death, yet they are told in different ways. They have both different and similar styles and themes that help the stories show their meanings of death. In Jonathan Edwards’s story, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” he talks about how going against God would bring that person’s fate straight to hell.
Puritan Test Question #4 Looking to help revive Puritanism, John Edwards became a traveling minuter giving intense, hellfire sermons. Through the powerful and relatable use of imagery, Edwards invoked fear and guilt from his audience in “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”.
In Johnathan Edward's, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God," Edwards has a particular style of writing that conveys an underlying purpose when delivering the sermon. Throughout the sermon, he uses multiple writing techniques and tools to engage the listener more, and to assure the listeners believe and trust him. Edwards purpose of writing and delivering the sermon, is to warn his people and to whomever else wants to agree, that they all must show their remorse of their sins to God before it is too late. Every sentence in the sermon, is based around scarring the people even more and more. Edwards accomplishes this by using certain diction and structure, a certain tone, and persuasive figurative language.
People in positions of power influence society by making them believe what they are their saying because they are seen as a bigger influence than the other people who aren’t in position of power. In the two passages, the two authors are in a higher position than everyone else, such as, in the speech, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” the person telling the speech, John Edwards was the priest of the church. In the speech, “Speech to the Virginia Convention” the person speaking was Patrick Henry, who at the time was a big influence on many things happening to our country at that time. They influence people because they know how to speak to interpret things in ways that can be understood and change people’s ideas about the topic.