preview

Sinners In The Hands Of An Angry God Rhetorical Analysis

Decent Essays

Jonathan Edwards was a revivalist preacher, philosopher, and protestant theologian. He lived between the years of 1703 through to 1753. In the year 1741, Edwards made a speech to a crowd of puritans. Because Edwards wanted the puritans to stay puritan, he made a sermon called “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” and that scared them into coming back to their original religion. He scared them into becoming puritan again by using ethos, pathos, and logos.

Edwards used ethos very well in his lecture. He has great examples in his speech for ethos. For example, he quotes the bible. The one thing the puritans care about the most and follow. And when he uses the bible in his sermon, he has points to back him up instead of him coming with his own. Also, since he is a minister, people are more willingly to listen to him because they have more respect for someone on his level than rather just another person. Edwards also states,”You are not sensible of this, but you do not see the Hand of God. . . . “ He says that for proof of good character. Edwards uses ethos to prove to them that he is right, and that the puritans should listen to him. …show more content…

Pathos is emotions. And Edwards had many examples of pathos in his sermon since he was talking about such a sensitive subject for him. For example, he states “Many will be in Hell before this year is out.” Since he says this, everyone’s emotions in the crowd is fear at this moment. They don’t want to go to hell, they don’t know why they will, they don’t know what they did wrong. But to Edwards, the puritans are going to hell because they didn’t stay puritan. But also throughout the speech, he is giving them a little smidge of hope, just so that they can think they won’t go to hell for what they have done. Just because they did not want to stay puritan and they were converting to other religions, didn’t mean, in their minds, they were going to

Get Access