Social And Anti Colonial Movements

Better Essays

History is always taking this different perspective throughout early civilization to modern day. Whether it has been a rise of a nation, a significant battle/event, or the signing of peace treaty historians have always taken different approaches to explain the event. However, few historians have acknowledge the importance of the international view is critical to understanding history as a whole. Furthermore, historian Thomas Bender argues that being specific will obscures the world impact on the significant event. This take in history by Bender is known as transnational history, which accounts world events that link to other events around the globe. Prior to understanding transitional history methodology we must comprehend the context of …show more content…

Bender notes: “Most historians of the Revolution and new nation have largely ignored this international context. . . Gordon Wood, another leading historian of the era, introduces the crisis the 1750’s as a sudden English intrusion into a colonial venture sustained by “benign neglect .” The quote complements his argument that one as a historian cannot overlook this important value of decision made outside of the nation. Bender’s methodology for this transnational history comes from these nations interaction through social, political, and economic actions. Another historian that agrees with Bender idea is Klaus Kiran Patel a historian. He notes in his publication, “To sum up: it would be wrong to think that transnational history is an entirely unstudied subject or a completely new approach to history. Connections between societies have always captured the attention of historians, be they diplomatic and political, cultural and social or economic. ” This returns to the reiterate that nation’s interactions in their specific area can alter another nation’s in a particular sector of the region. Bender goes further on to explain how the American Revolution is portrayed as this great nationalistic movement by the colonist. This in turn once again obscures the idea that outside influences have an effect on the outcome of the Revolution. He defend this statement by writing, “There is nothing wrong with these framings, but the narrative is so tightly

Get Access