preview

Socialism

Better Essays

I think this has gotten way off track. Let's go back to square one for just a moment. You responded to this video which was regarding anarchism and it went into details about tactics. Your criticism was that what was offered was a bureaucratic state which offers nothing to the workers. That is a strawman argument unless you can demonstrate when and where the finnishbolshevik advocates for such a thing. Regardless of that though, it's kind of beside the point. The state is something that arises naturally given our current material conditions in this stage of history, and that entails bureacracy in some form or another whether or not you like it. I absolutely welcome people to discuss how that should be managed in the future in order to …show more content…

Clearly, you're contradicting and deviating from your original argument that no rights (social or political) were had by the soviet people. If you believed your original argument was sufficient enough you would have stuck to your guns and not changed your tune. And it is a fact that before the USSR, Russia was a backward country in which most of its citizens couldn't even read. Within a few decades it became a super power on par with the United States. That is quite a feat, and did all of that while providing the things I mentioned. You did, and your original point should be tossed out because it is an indefensible one. A piece of advice: In the future, it would demonstrate more intellectual honesty not to use hyperbole to sell a narrative. That might make you look good to those who already hang on your every word and follow your every lead, but it's not actually conducive to good argumentative practices. "I think there is a difference between bureacratic tasks which are a part of any complex organization and the monopoly of political power by a strata which performs those tasks." Firstly, I don't know about you, but I consider a debate a cooperative process even in the case that two people who are ideologically opposed, and in that spirit I think a certain degree of transparency should be a given. I prefaced that the question I posed previously was a yes or no question and to

Get Access