Sports Stadium Research Paper

Historically, when sports teams move into a city it bring the influence of sports, and gets the community more involved. After the Cold War, US officials wanted to make young men stronger to be prepared to defend the country through sport. Parks, gyms and other recreational places were implemented because it was thought that through sport these men could prove their country was superior to all nations (Friedman 4/26). These recreational sport and parks would help men develop militaristic values and strategies. President Kennedy introduced the presidential fitness test to have physical training start at young ages as well. Us leaders wanted to close a perceived muscle gap between youth in the US and youth in Europe. (Montez 129).It is also said that by having a stadium in a city would create potential athletes because there was a plethora of parks and gyms around, there was no excuse for an athlete to not be created. This deal however, took that from Cobb County. In the article it states that, paying for the stadium meant budget cuts for the county’s park system. This would create a muscle gap with in the country itself, also eliminating potential athletes that could come from the

In the United States, new sports stadiums are commonly seen as a vital part of the redevelopment of a city having a great economic growth with the production of jobs and a positive income builder. After this, the owners of the pro sports teams with millions and millions of dollars of subsidies for the construction of new stadiums and arenas and expect these facilities to generate economic benefits exceeding these subsidies by large margins. However, a growing body of fact indicates that professional sports facilities, and the franchises they are home to, may not be engines of economic benefit anywhere claims Sachse, “. In reality, sports franchises typically account for a very small proportion of the total economic output of the cities in which they reside.” Some economical studies on the amount of income and employment in US cities find no evidence of positive economic benefits associated with past sports facility construction and some studies find that professional sports facilities and teams have a net negative economic impact on income and employment. It just shows that these results suggest that at best, professional sports teams and facilities provide non-pecuniary benefits like civic pride, and a greater sense of community, along with consumption benefits to those attending games and following the local team in the media; at worst, residents

Stadium subsidies are used to fiancé new stadiums. The government provides financial support to franchises that allows them to build their new stadiums. These subsidies are costing tax payers millions and do not seem to be in the best interest of the city the stadium is in. Those in favor of using tax payer dollars to build stadiums argue that the economic impact a professional franchise has on a city is great and a new stadium will help generate revenue. Research has shown this is not the case. Most stadiums cost the city and never produce enough revenue to make up for those costs (Bast, 1990).

Sports teams are a symbol of a cities pride. Take for example the Chicago Cubs. They create a sense of loyalty toward that city. However, none of that would happen without a stadium. Stadiums and teams can play a very important role in a cities economy, or they could also be irrelevant. To decide whether or not they are useful or not you must first understand each side of the argument. So first, let’s examine the pros of having a stadium within your city. Then, we will discuss the harms of having one. And finally, decide which side is more beneficial for the economy.

Sports Stadiums are an iconic staple of American tradition. However not everything about these venues is positive. Team owners take advantage of laws and fans to meet their own goals. Citizens and city officials from various locations have taken up their grievances with the NFL in the past. And it

Being able to practice every day could help kids like the sport and sign up and play for the school. They would be able to practice in the winter instead of not being able to practice, when other school haven't practiced for months. They could also make it look like our school is really good because we practice inside. The more people that go to the indoor fields, the more people that most likely would sign up for the school which means more money gets earned.

Dodger Stadium is home for the one and only Los Angeles dodgers. The 56,000-seat Dodger Stadium, is definitely a place in history. It also has over 300 acres of land just for the Dodgers.

The Colorado Rockies' stadium has been around since 1995. The name of the stadium is Coors Park. It is located in Denver, Colorado. In 1999, Coors Field was founded as the most prolific offensive ballpark ever created. The Rockies and their opponents combined for 303 home runs,

Zable Stadium, home of the William and Mary Tribe football team, is right in the heart of the Virginia city of Williamsburg. Travelling a few miles from Williamsburg, you find two thrill-packed amusement parks; Busch Gardens and Water Country USA. Busch Gardens is approximately 8 miles south-east and features roller coasters, including Griffon, Alpengeist, and Apollo's Chariot in its nearly 400-acre site themed around European cities. Water Country USA, 8 miles east, is a 60s surf inspired water park with wave pools, slides and river rides. Wine lovers will enjoy Williamsburg Winery, offering tastings and tours of the 300-acre site, just 6 miles south of the city. While visiting the winery, treat yourself to a meal at Cafe Provencal, where

There are countless economic reasons why college athletes should get compensated for their time and effort; however, none may be as important as the fact that it would lead to economic efficiency. Economic efficiency is accomplished when every resource is allocated to serve each person in the best way possible while diminishing waste and inefficient spending. Without payment to players, universities must currently spend millions of dollars on athletic program facilities in order to attract the most coveted prospects. Spending this money on paying players to attend their university rather than on facilities is a much more economically efficient method of attracting athletes, assuming ceteris paribus. By redirecting the outflow of cash from athletic facilities to the athletes themselves decreases both wasteful spending and inefficiency. Competition for top athletic recruits is being created through over-spending by universities, when in reality the student athletes would likely take payments considerably lower than the price of building new athletic infrastructure. Former Stanford economics professor, Roger Noll stated that, “It’s much more efficient to pay people for what they’re producing than it is to create a competition for the right to exploit them,” (qtd. In Strauss, 2014) which rings true for all industries including collegiate sports where the

Where would you most like to live? I would love to live in Philadelphia,PA right by the Eagles stadium. The reason I would love to live here because I am a HUGE Eagles fan. I would love to go there and tailgate in the parking lot with other Eagles fans or buy season tickets and go every sunday with friends. If I can not make it to a game like monday or thursday I would still love to hear the fireworks go off and the announcer commentate the game.

Mosaic stadium, home of the Saskatchewan Roughriders, has had a makeover in the last few years with talk of a new stadium with a whole new design back in 2012 finally being built. Although aesthetically pleasing, the new stadium has only created more issues for both the city and the province.

Being born and raised in Los Angeles, California, the article that intrigued me was “Dodgers asking $12 million a year for naming rights to field”, by Terry Lefton. In the eyes of some, commercialism has saturated historical Major League Baseball stadiums with signage and advertisements plastered across walls. Today, America’s

Each of the  stadiums are funded in unique ways, communities do not benefit from new stadiums, and stadiums do not save a struggling downtown. Foremost, stadiums hurt public schools, and this money should be used for more important public services.  There are many  reasons we subsidize sports, but stadiums do not help the economy, and there are no net benefits from stadiums.  Teams strive for new stadiums to create an image,  but there are  options so that a community will not loose a team to another city without building a new stadium.

Unfortunately, these arguments contain bad economic reasoning that leads to overstatement of the benefits of stadiums. Economic growth takes place when a community's resources--people, capital investments, and natural resources like land--become more productive. Increased productivity can arise in two ways: from economically beneficial specialization by the community for the purpose of trading with other regions or from local value added that is higher than other uses of local workers, land, and investments. Building a stadium is good for the local economy only if a stadium is the most productive way to make capital investments and use its workers.