Change is inevitable and sometimes difficult for some to accept. It is a challenge trying to get stakeholders to buy into change, because it is impossible to satisfy everyone. Stakeholder support is important for the new pharmacy to succeed in the healthcare organization. “Involving stakeholders during all stages … can lead to early buy-in, successful program design, and establishment of long-term support for the program” (www.ahrq.gov, 2014). If the stakeholders were not involved in some of the decisions and planning stages of the new pharmacy, they would be left feeling insecure and confused about the transition. Approaching the stakeholders with a good business plan will help alleviate some of the insecurities. According to Carr et, al …show more content…
If the pharmacy would offer discounted drugs, they could expect to see customers who are self-pay or do not have a prescription plan. Self-paying customers and those on a monthly budget would be attracted to discounted prices that the pharmacy could offer. Pharmacist could provide detailed information about the prescription and what drugs may counteract them, continuing the health management plan provided by the physician. After establishing the need for customer base, they would have to look at the competition and their buying patterns. One thing this pharmacy has is the availability to patient’s medical health history on hand; this would make the patient at ease knowing the pharmacist has knowledge of their medical history. According to Williams & Torrens (2008), “As patients and health care professionals have turned increasingly to medications as cost-effective alternatives to invasive surgery and hospitalization, spending on prescription medications has naturally increased” (263). Medicine is providing patients to live longer, healthier lives even though they might suffer from a chronic illness or disease. Showing stakeholders this information of increased prescription medications might help influence their decision to support the new pharmacy. An incentive of more financial income to the
In Money Talks: Profit Before Patient Safety, a documentary on the business behind drugs, states that sale representatives for drug companies only job is “to push for their products [to be sold] in doctor offices.” And quite frankly this statement is prevalent in today’s economy; the economy is centered around accumulating wealth, to the point where other factors to earn such wealth is not accounted for. Money is an object which makes everyone selfish. Drug companies only care about the benefits they’re receiving and the growth of their wallets. The society grew up to look upon doctors, because doctors are certified to diagnose and treat patients. Every time we have a health issue, we turn to doctors. Every time we have the flu, we turn to doctors.
The other groups within buyers of pharmaceutical products, while fragmented, have more power than patients. Within the American healthcare system, insurance companies and health maintenance companies (HMOs) have considerable bargaining power, as they decide which drugs to endorse and provide. Since they have an interest in lowering costs, they exert a strong downward pressure on drug prices, partly due to the threat of the availability of generics. European governments’ national healthcare systems have a similarly high level of power, if not higher due to strict price controls. Thus, pharmaceutical companies have a need to establish successful
"In the past two decades or so, health care has been commercialized as never before, and professionalism in medicine seems to be giving way to entrepreneurialism," commented Arnold S. Relman, professor of medicine and social medicine at Harvard Medical School (Wekesser 66). This statement may have a great deal of bearing on reality. The tangled knot of insurers, physicians, drug companies, and hospitals that we call our health system are not as unselfish and focused on the patients' needs as people would like to think. Pharmaceutical companies are particularly ruthless, many of them spending millions of dollars per year to convince doctors to prescribe their drugs and to convince consumers that their specific brand of drug is needed in
Shortages of prescription drugs in the United States are a serious threat to our nation’s health and safety. At first blush, this problem appears fairly simple and straight forward to solve. In reality, there is a complex web of causation with a number of root causes contributing to drug shortages. The aim of this paper is to answer the question: How do we mitigate prescription drug shortages? This discussion is written from the standpoint of advising the current presidential administration how to address this crisis. This essay begins with a discussion regarding the background of the issue. Next, the landscape, including stakeholders in this matter is identified. Following, political, social, economic, and practical factors surrounding
The twenty-first century has seen pharmaceutical companies grow in unprecedented size and strength. Due to the unprecedented growth the larger pharmaceutical companies have gained leverage and power in the prescription drug industry, but they lack innovation to market and they seek ways to help the business continue to increase its profits. The pharmaceutical industry was once ethically sound and was a valuable player in the development of human health. However, overtime with the lack of innovation pharmaceutical companies are becoming an unethical market that exploits patients, doctors and anyone else it can to increase its profitability. With eyes only on profitability this can create a hazard for patients because there
Everybody reaches out of pocket to pay for different prescription drugs. Parents for children, elderly for health conditions, and pet owners for pets, but there is one extensive concern; the price and outcomes. Transiently, it may be common for someone to come out of pocket for some prescriptions, but when people draw out of pocket every time just to pick up a prescription drug, it becomes annoying and upsetting. Pharmaceutical companies like CVS and Walgreens collect over $1,000,000 dollars just from gouging people for medications. According to David Belk (M.D.), Pharmacies buy medication in mass from pharmaceutical corporations and suppliers, then sell for a profit. What everyone is trying to ask the companies though is why. Why would a top-producing company like CVS or Walgreens sell expensive medications to a group of people like the elderly for profit?
The passage of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Act will also inadvertently increase access to many types of medications for individuals who qualify for Medicare Part D. There is a clause within the bill that would establish rebates to be paid by pharmaceutical companies for low-income beneficiaries. These rebates, in addition to lowered costs, would considerably lessen the financial burden placed on low-income beneficiaries. This will allow more individuals greater access to expensive medications. As an example, each year, financial reasons hinder about 16% of diabetic Part D beneficiaries from filling at least one of their prescriptions (Williams, Steers, Ettner, Mangione, & Duru, 2013). This increase in access will help mitigate the occurrence of cost-related nonadherence to prescription medications, and other such consequences
Medicare, one of the greatest purchasing clients in the medication industry, is not lawfully allowed to bargain first hand with companies for lower medication costs or best possible price. (Kounang, 2015)
Prescription drug prices are on the rise in the United States. Currently, the United States does not implement a price control on prescription drugs. Every day the supply and demand for prescription drugs fluctuates. Pharmaceutical companies produce drugs that are necessary for survival. Therefore, it is necessary for research and development to continue in the United States. Those suffering the effects of exorbitant prices must do so until a generic form of a prescription drug is produced. Once approved by the FDA, new drugs will make their appearance on the market and patients will no longer suffer financially. Until then, it is necessary for pharmaceutical companies to price their drugs based on the idea of supply and demand. This produces the profit used to fund research. Price controls discourage innovation. If a price control were set in place, of course the price of prescription drugs would decrease. However, the development of new drugs decreases with it. Today’s generation would benefit from lower prices, while future generations would suffer from the loss of drug innovation.
Effective medication helps with the rising cost of health care. When medication is working, the patient’s visits to the hospital and doctor’s office will decrease. The cost of new medication is exceeding the buyer’s ability to pay for it, and pharmaceutical companies begin to lose money when the drug loses its patent. However, generic drugs become available for the medication, and patients can afford to purchase it to treat their disease or condition. National discussions with providers, payers, and health policy makers have seriously considered various solutions for mitigating drug cost, with the ultimate goal of allowing patients to access appropriate and necessary treatments (Li & Shane, 2017). The government no longer has to decide who gets the medication, and certain therapies because of cost. Insurance companies will now cover the drug in its generic form. On the other hand, the pharmaceutical companies can no longer profit from and generic drug, and are forced to make new and improved drugs for profit. The patient will benefit by getting the medication that is needed to have a better quality of
The Pharmaceutical industry has been in the spotlight for decades due to the fact that they have a reputation for being unethical in its marketing strategies. In The Washington Post Shannon Brownlee (2008) states, “We try never to forget that medicine is for the people. It is not for the profits. The profits follow.” This honorable statement is completely lost in today’s world of pharmaceutical marketing tactics. These tactics are often deceptive and biased. Big Pharma consistently forgets their moral purpose and focuses primarily on the almighty dollar. Big Pharma is working on restoring their reputation by reforming their ethical code of conduct.
The competitive prices, countless discount opportunities, and friendly employees keep customers loyal to Walgreens even if they are not making frequent visits to the pharmacy department. This paper seeks to analyze the different components of the drug store industry and the aspects of the marketing strategy of the Walgreens Company that have kept it a strong competitor for so many years.
One of the problems of Medicare itself is that it doesn't cover the costs of prescription drugs for its members; this has led to one of the major reasons that the program is in danger. A great deal of personal healthcare relies on the use of drugs, and since the program doesn't cover these costs, the individual must bear them. According to the AARP, in 1999 out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs were estimated to be $450 per person each year (AARP). Obviously, members have joined the program to defray their medical costs, but these figures indicate that they still have large costs to pay. The other problem faced by the Medicare program is that it is also suffering from a lack of funds. According to Governor George W. Bush, the financial health of Medicare is in serious jeopardy and might face deficit as soon as 2010 (Bush). As a result of these major problems, one might wonder why the plan isn't scrapped for another program; well according to polls done by the Public Agenda, an Internet public policy site, American citizens are strongly in favor of Medicare, and would rather see the problems ironed out (Public Agenda). Therefore it is necessary to come up with a solution, so that the Medicare program remains intact.
Society expects drug companies to improve people’s well-being and to behave like a nonprofit company not overly concerned with making large profits. However, investors
The market for generic drugs has been increasing recently, with a large share of total prescriptions being dispensed in the United States. At the wholesale level, the generic drug market has typically been viewed as very competitive, such that prices approach marginal costs1. Therefore the availability of generic drugs is perceived as beneficial to consumers who have to pay for these drugs. However, at the retail level, generic drug prices seem to exceed marginal cost even by a wide margin1. In the last few decades, “the fraction of drug spending paid for by public and private payers has grown from 34% in 1980 to nearly 80% in 2000, and 92% in 2010. Thus cash-paying consumers currently account for only 8% of payments”1.