preview

Summary: Improving My Writing Style

Decent Essays

This week’s reading focuses on one of my known weaknesses, writing. I am always trying to improve my style. I feel that two of the biggest problems I have are word use and my style and tone (Bovee & Thill, 2016). I use sites online to assist in pointing these out. I am slowly learning but I still have much more to understand. In our reading it says, “The right tone depends on the nature of your message and your relationship with the reader” (Bovee & Thill, 2016 p. 126). Our reading also gave us five guidelines to use; understand the difference between texting and writing, avoid stale and pompous language, avoid preaching and bragging, be careful with intimacy, and be careful with humor (Bovee & Thill, 2016). These suggestions are all vital …show more content…

Using technical jargon and big words may seem impressive to some. However, if you are using words that the audience doesn’t understand, then their attention will slowly disappear. It also shows a disrespect for the audience. Lastly, when we speak about tone, we come to an area I have struggled with. Throughout my life, I have been told to never use passive voice in writing. However, in our reading it better explains how and when we should use both styles. When we need to be direct, then passive voice shouldn’t be our style. Although when trying to be more diplomatic or accusatory then passive voice could be a better option. This has given me more insight into my writing for future correspondence. Another concept is word use, specifically choosing more powerful words (Bovee & Thill, 2016). Understanding the denotative/literal meaning or the connotative/feelings associated with words used (Bovee & Thill, 2016 p. 130). When writing, we must understand how the words could have different meaning to the audience then what we …show more content…

We had operation reports, correspondence, award recommendations and performance reports that kept us busy. The concepts discussed earlier were all used to compose those writings. Since most of our reports and correspondence were sent to personnel who also at one time, performed the same job, we could get away with technical jargon. For the most part we always used active voice also. Most managers expected people to tell them the information straight, to be forthcoming and direct. The only time passive voice was used was when you might be questioning the boss’s decision. This was usually done privately anyway and not distributed for all to see. Now when I came to writing performance reports and award recommendations, that’s when these and the other concepts were used. We had to be careful and use more of the plain talk. Often times, the reports and recommendations would be read by personnel that may not have a clue about our jobs. So for this, wiring in plain language that they could understand was paramount. This was difficult for some, especially new supervisors writing their first reports or recommendations. Many times, I had to sit down with them and go over how the words were too technical and give examples of how others may not understand. This was vital because these people would choose winners or people to promote from these correspondences so we had to ensure they weren’t confused by the

Get Access