preview

Summary Of The Giver By Lois Lowry : The Destruction Of History

Decent Essays

The destruction of history can cause great loss of information. Information such as recipes, maps, events, etc. Without history the world would not be itself, information would travel slowly feuds would go on and on, people would repeat the past not knowing its consequences. If the history was saved, it would advance civilization incrementally, without it, it will hinder the way civilization grows. History can make the community in The Giver by Lois Lowry a great place for everyone. With history, people can learn from the past, obtain a different perspective on a situation, and stop manipulation. Without memories of the past, the community of The Giver by Lois Lowry cannot learn from the past. I understand that the memories of the past may not even be used even if we have the history, for example, Charlotte Libov said in a conversation “The American public is ignorant of mechanics of American government.” This shows how people will not even learn their basic rights. But it is better to have history so they can learn from the past when they need to, for example, the community committee would do nothing “they would simply fret and argue about it themselves for years until the citizens forgot that it had ever gone to them for study” (Lowry 18). “For years” they would argue indefinitely. This was due to the committee did not even know how to deal with it. None of the members had memories of the past, so they had no way of measuring or judging what is the best option for the

Get Access