Synthesis Essay On Capital Punishment

Capital Punishment is an issue that has been argued over from the dinner table in

The following description of Evans's electrocution was sworn to and verified by Russell F. Canan on June 22, 1983:

Bedeau, Hugo. "The Case Against the Death Penalty ." ACLU.org. ACLU, 11 Dec 2012. Web. 9 Mar 2013. <http://www.aclu.org/capital-punishment/case-against-death-penalty

Now I would like to give you a few examples of famous, and not so famous cases

Capital punishment is necessary in several occasions in the United States for various reasons it brings justice and safety. By doing this act around the United States it will prevent future crimes from happening anywhere no one will have to worry about that individual committing a terrible act. Look at Ted Bundy for example a serial killer that killed over thirty-six women around the United States but several individuals thought he killed more than one hundred women. He was executed in the electric chair in 1989 in Florida. Either way it will cost a lot to keep a prisoner for life in prison and cost a lot for a person in death row as well but cheaper. A person on the death penalty is cheaper than a person who is in prison for life without parole because even though it cost a lot for a person on death row, life in prison is a lot higher because of food, healthcare and other cost for maintaining a healthy individual. As more inmates start showing up the problem becomes bigger with money and space.

Many people believe that the topic usually arisen in politics the death penalty should not be regarded when sentencing someone however it is a form of punishment to others.This has caused a heated storm within society.We’re all a bit bias even in the courtroom we confer and differ.Whether or not one has the intent or one is evident of murder we all have our bends.Yet you may be wondering how does the government interfere with the death penalty? Or perhaps what my bend is.

According to the Editorial Board in their opinion article on Capital Punishment, they believe that capital punishment should no longer be in existence as it is “violating the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishments” (Editorial Board, “Capital Punishment Deserves a sick Death”). Although capital punishment may be a cruel and unusual punishment and viewed as unnecessary in certain situations, I believe the Editorial Board fails to connect their supporting points to their conclusion and understand the reasoning behind capital punishment in today’s criminal justice system.

Despite this on going argument, outlawing capital punishment in America could create many unhappy citizens, and cause a division in the U.S. government. By enforcing the death penalty prevention in crime could occur. If death is the punishment for murder then criminals are not gaining from their crimes, but receiving the punishment they have inflicted on others. The crime rate is lower in the states that do not invoke capital punishment, but as Walter Burns stated “the number of murders tend to rise with the crime rate in general - and not only in America,” (105). Capital punishment is maintained to hopefully show criminals that when they kill they will eventually meet the same fate. By enforcing the death penalty the government could be trying to scare criminals from their crimes, and in some cases it has worked. When the death penalty was restored in Kansas, for example, the homicide rate dropped considerably (Bedau 122). According to research done by Bedau the crime rate continued to sore between 1960-1969 when capital punishment was rarely being used in most states (Bedau 127).

This country is determined to prove that killing someone under certain circumstances is acceptable, when in all reality there can be no rationalization for the taking of another human life.  Killing is murder.  It is as simple as that.  There have been so many different controversies surrounding this debate that often, the issues become clouded in false statistics and slewed arguments.  The basic fact remains that killing is morally and ethically wrong.  This fact does not disappear by simply changing the term "murder" to "capital punishment".  The act is still the taking of a life.  On these grounds, the death penalty should be abolished.

In today’s society Capital Punishment is still in place and the cost for each execution is phenomenal. Politics, racism, mental state and plea bargaining all play an important part in who gets executed. The capital punishment was reinstated in 1976, since then there have been 138 “volunteer” executions. With this in mind I will explore some of the facts and the fiction that surrounds the capital punishment. In all honesty, I think the capital punishment should be abolished. (Amnesty 2010)

     Crime has been a plague on society from ancient times to present. In response to

     Many positions can be defended when debating the issue of capital punishment. In Jonathan Glover's essay "Executions," he maintains that there are three views that a person may have in regard to capital punishment: the retributivist, the absolutist, and the utilitarian. Although Glover recognizes that both statistical and intuitive evidence cannot validate the benefits of capital punishment, he can be considered a utilitarian because he believes that social usefulness is the only way to justify it. Martin Perlmutter on the other hand, maintains the retributivist view of capital punishment, which states that a murderer deserves to be punished because of a conscious decision to

As a nation, Americans have struggled to define the true meaning of a murder. While of course a murder, in its simplest form, occurs when one human takes the life of another, Americans have broken this definition into smaller categories. First, second, and third degree murders all have different meanings and are punishable in different ways. The worst category of these murders is first degree murder, a murder than was planned and committed with full intention. Today, there are still states in the US where those who commit first degree murder are punished by death, the capital punishment.

An innocent man is wrongly executed whilst a man who raped and murdered a mother and her thirteen year old daughter spends the rest of his life with three meals a day and cable television. Which of these is the bigger injustice? The use of the death penalty to punish serious crimes is a very controversial topic and there is much debate surrounding the issue. This paper will briefly discuss arguments supporting and against the use of the death penalty.

Is the death penalty a just way of punishing those who commit a horrible crime? The answer to that depends on the standpoint of an individual. Fox Butterfield of the New York Times notices that “In the view of some, the failure to enforce the death penalty reflects and enduring ambivalence about the capital punishment. Others say that the death penalty opponents have found ways to triumph over the public will to carry out executions.” In a capitalistic standpoint, there is the notion that it simply costs too much. There is another and more simple standpoint and that is that the death penalty is not working. This is where I personally stand on the issue. The death penalty is a just punishment for a