Essay on Teleological and Deontological Ethical Systems

Ethics are concerned with the fundamental concepts and principles of decent human conduct; which is having a sense of what is right and wrong. Utilitarianism

As a Christian, there are three ethical systems that one could look to, to mold their ethical decisions around which all include a foundation of absolutism. But not all absolutism ethical systems are equal. Of the three ethical systems (unqualified absolutism, conflicting absolutism, graded absolutism), graded absolutism stands out as the strongest ethical system to follow.

There are seven different major ethical systems and they are: ethical formalism, utilitarianism, religion, natural law, ethics of virtue, ethics of care, and egoism. All seven of these ethical systems are dealt with on a daily basis and sometimes it is hard to determine which one you are dealing with. Ethical systems intertwine with one another and make up how humans respond and react to situations they are faced with every day. Each ethical system has its own way of coming across to each individual, and it is also going to depend on how each individual person looks at the problems and situations they are dealing with.

Ethics are only based on what a group finds to be right or wrong as well as what a person might find right or wrong, like taking another person's life most will agree that is wrong and should not be done, that would be a group ethic, while someone may also add that killing of animals is also wrong that would be a personal ethics.

Promoting gender equality and empowering women and girls is a priority for the United States. Women’s equality has came a long ways. Women used to have it very hard historically, but even today women still experience some inequality towards men. In this paper it will examine the equalities in: voting, the workplace, and sexual harassment. This paper will also so how the ethical theories of Deontology and Utilitarianism plays a part and how the ethical perspective Emotivism also plays a part.

A deontological approach to ethics denies the utilitarian claim that the morality of an action depends on its consequences. Actions are morally right or wrong, independent of their consequences. It is associated with the Judeo-Christian tradition, primarily the Ten Commandments. (pg. 62) Is direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceutical drugs ethical? Does the advertising lead to self-diagnosis or take advantage of someone’s hope for a cure?

Great question, I find that once I understood the difference between ethics and morality and deontological vs teleological approaches in my work as an interpreter I am tend to use a teleological approach ethically. However, if a dilemma or decision appears to conflict with my deontological moral principles as a Christian I lean toward making my final decision based on what I morally believe is true. When younger I did not give much thought to these issues and often went with my gut not paying attention to the bigger picture and analysis if my choices or decisions when faced with ethical or moral dilemmas. For example, one year during my work in a classroom I was faced with whether or not to turn a teacher in for verbal abuse towards students

Teleology is considering an act morally right or acceptable if it produces some desired result such as pleasure, the realization of self-interest, fame, utility, or wealth. This is broken down into two different teleological philosophies, egoism and utilitarian. Egoism is the right or acceptable behavior in terms of its consequences for the individual. Utilitarianism is following a relatively straightforward method for deciding the morally correct course of action for any particular situation. They identify all the foreseeable benefits and harms that could result from each course of action for those affected by the action, and then choose the course

Deontology names a type of ethical theory that judges human practices based on whether they are consistent with certain duties that the theory holds as intrinsically moral. Consequences are irrelevant

Act deontology and rule deontology are two types of deontological ethics. Act deontology states that there are no strict ethical acts followed when making ethical choices. Decisions should be made according to each person doing what they feel is the right thing to do at each moment.

In this term we have learned a lot about ethics and how we should carry ourselves in our daily lives. Certain situations makes being ethical a little difficult to do as we have seen in this course, but because it’s not easy doesn’t mean we should not stick to doing the right things. These are some of the things that we have learned this term: “Normative ethical systems can generally be broken down into three categories: deontological, teleological and virtue ethics. The first two are considered deontic or action-based theories of morality because they focus entirely upon the actions which a person performs. When actions are judged morally right based upon their consequences, we have teleological or consequentialist ethical theory. When actions are judged morally right based upon how well they conform to some set of duties, we have a deontological ethical theory. Whereas these first two systems focus on the question "What should I do?" the third asks an entirely different question: "What sort of person should I be?" With this we have a virtue-based ethical theory - it doesn 't judge actions as right or wrong but rather the character of the person doing the actions. The person, in turn, makes moral decisions based upon which actions would make one a good person. Deontological moral systems are characterized primarily by a focus upon adherence to independent moral rules or duties. Thus, in order to make the correct moral choices, we simply have to understand what our moral

Throughout history, wars over the meaning of equality have been expressed in many ways for the purpose of establishing one standard to the meaning of equal. Equal is being treated with the same respect regardless of gender. The theory of deontology has defined and developed the meaning of equal within society. However, it has been a slow process. Miscommunication and misunderstanding to the meaning of gender equality is responsible for personal and social tyranny. Happiness, fairness, and dignity have risen from social roles, poverty, and health reform that defined the message to the question of what it means to be equal and unequal among men and women using the deontology theory as this essay will demonstrate.

The four main ethical frameworks are Proportionalism, Utilitarianism, Situation Ethics and Natural Law. There many other ethical points of view besides these four, some only slightly different from one these and some very different from any of these, but most people will be able to roughly fit in one of these categories.

In ethics, four systems serve as different beliefs concerning our morals: Relativism Ethics, Consequentialism Ethics, Deontological Ethics, and Virtue Ethics. These four theories attempt to define what right and wrong should be and how one should handle any situation. There are many strengths and weaknesses of each view. The goal is to determine which theory is the best by exploring real world situations and questioning the claims that just don’t work out.

The teleological theory therefore holds that the rightness of an action is determined solely by its consequences. The most common example of the teleological theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism (John Stuart Mills) - the end justifies the means (Boatright, 2009)