preview

Thalidomide Was First Introduced By German Pharmaceutical

Decent Essays

Thalidomide was first introduced by German pharmaceutical company Chemie Grünenthal in late 1950s, and was marketed as a sedative and a treatment for morning sickness in pregnancy. It soon became very popular among pregnant women, but only until they started noticing its disturbing side effect. In 1962, it was discovered that the thalidomide taken during the first trimester of pregnancy caused the reduction deformities of the limbs of fetus as well as visceral, facial, spinal, and other birth defects (Sherman, M., & Strauss, S., 1986). Germany and some other countries immediately withdrew the drug, but the damage was already done. More than 10,000 babies were born with or died from severe deformities (Emanuel, Rawlins, Duff, & …show more content…

Prior to the amendments, only safety of the drug needed to be proven to be approved by FDA. The amendments now required new drugs to show efficiency as well as safety--which means drugs need to show that their benefits outweigh risks in order to be approved. The three phases of clinical trials were now done to prove the drug’s safety and efficiency--phase I trials typically assess data on safety; phase II trials evaluate efficacy; and phase III trials compare the potential drug with standard therapy, usually on a randomized, double-blind basis (Jonsen & Stryker, 1993). Up to this point, it seems logical that drug regulation needs to be stricter, and it seems ethical to have government protect us from possibly dangerous drugs. But was strengthening drug regulation really effective? What are the negative consequences? In answer to these questions, I will discuss about the flaws of the Kefauver-Harris Amendments and the controversies brought up to light during the AIDS epidemic. The Kefauver-Harris Amendments had controversial consequences. The new amendments made the process of the drug development long and expensive; the average development time for a new drug rose from 2.5 years to 8 years (Darrow, Sarpatwari, Avorn, & Kesselheim, 2015). Additionally, the amendment created the “drug lag”—more than 600 drugs were categorized as “ineffective” after retrospective review and were removed them from the market (Greene & Podolsky, 2012).

Get Access