b) Our assessment of significant accounts
Misstatement in auditing is the difference among the amount, grouping, presentation or disclosure of any reported financial statement element and the amount, grouping, presentation or disclosure mandatory for the element to be in agreement with the pertinent financial reporting framework (Moroney, Campbell, & Hamilton, 2014). Material misstatements can occur due to either fraud or error (ACCA Global, 2014). The auditor ought to ascertain and evaluate the risks of material misstatement right from the financial statement level and the assertion or declaration level (Arens, Elder, & Beasley, 2013). The process involves first gaining an understanding of the organization and its control procedures.
…show more content…
A benefit is supposed to go hand in hand with the amount of input a person contributes to the generation of profits. However, if by overstating these expenses allows for few individuals to siphon cash from the company, this account needs proper audit measures to determine the level of material misstatement in it. This happens in most expense accounts, therefore, necessitating an auditor to request for proper proof of an expense incurred.
Thirdly, the property, plant and equipment of the company are vulnerable to material misstatement for Tamawood limited. Being a construction company, some clients require that contractors own substantial assets in order to qualify for tenders advertised. Malicious and greedy companies that do not meet the set threshold may opt to overvalue their asset value. This is mainly concealed in accounts such as property, plant, and equipment, which tend to have a substantial contribution to the value of assets that a company owns. Auditors need to be keen on such accounts, note any sudden increases in the value of assets, and require proof of any new purchases and/or disposal of such assets. Thus, the account is vulnerable to be materially misstated and needs extra attention from auditors.
The fourth account vulnerable to material misstatement is the provisions account. Items such as bad
E. Why does the auditor not use the same tolerable misstatement or percentage of account balance for all financial statement accounts?
It is the susceptibility of an account balance or a class of transactions to a material misstatement, assuming that there were no internal controls. The inherent risk at Telstra is that there may be certain types of misstatements that may not be identified during the course of audit. The inherent risk associated with the audit of Telstra is ascertained based on the nature of the business. Telstra Corporation Limited have these kinds of risks:- inventory valuation risk, intangible assets valuation risk, foreign currency risk, interest rate risk, tax risk, amendment risk and compliance risk. All the above stated risks pose potential material misstatements on the financial statements and thus need to be addressed (Telstra
According to an article in the CPA Journal, the accounting profession has long contended that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) provides reasonable assurance that there are no material misstatements contained within financial statements. Suggest at least two (2) alternative methods that auditors can use to provide a more concrete level of assurance to investors. Provide support for your responses with examples of such methods in use.
CAS 300 requires auditors to their audit using a risk based model where the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures are based on the assessed risk of material misstatement. Pickett (2006) argues that for audits to be effective and efficient, much of the audit effort should be focused on areas that are considered to pose the highest audit risk. Additional audit procedures should be linked to individual audit assertions whereas other audit procedures need to be performed as and when needed. Thus, for an audit plan to be put in place, it is necessary for an auditor to come up with a risk profile of the client comprising an understanding of the business operating by the audit client, assess business risk and also perform its preliminary analytical review.
The next step is to inspect the accounting estimates made by the company. It is another area in which misstatements can easily be occurred. In this area, we will also identify any potential trends that may be offsetting the financial
al, 2012, p. 214). Therefore, a material misstatement may not be detected during the audit. In addition, the audit may not detect errors under the materiality level, whether resulting from error, fraud, or misappropriation of assets. Anderson, Olds, and Watershed may decline to express an opinion or issue a report if the firm is unable to complete the audit for any reason.
If a material accounting error is discovered, accounting standards require companies to restate their historical financial statements (FASB ASC 250-10-45-23)
Potential for misstatement & fraud: Compliance with the established procedures and controls were found to be ineffective. The fraud reporting process, technically put in place does not serve its intended purpose. The ineffective control environment has created an attitude and tone across the company where errors and inappropriate behavior may be seen as acceptable, thus creating opportunity for concealing fraud and potential misstatements.
During the performance of this integrated audit, require numerous judgments about the internal control and overall financial reporting and how well it addresses risks of material misstatements within the financial statements (AICPA, 2014). After re-evaluating the previous errors found from the previous audit, the audit team found the corrective actions to be appropriate and justified in elimination of human error by implementing additional checks and balances within the manual process. No additional misstatements have been found and all internal controls off the financial reporting seem appropriate and just.
The auditing firm has been in engagement with the company throughout the period when the fraud was being committed. One of the common and clear indicators of possible fraud was the company’s cash flow statement. The company experienced positive growth in its profits from the year 1996 through to the year 1998. However, a close analysis of the cash flow statement shows that the company had experienced negative figures of cash flow from both operating and investing activities and positive cash flow from financing activities which would not sufficiently offset the negative cash flows from operating and investing. It is therefore evident
B) I think the auditors should have equal responsibility for detecting material misstatements due to error and fraud. It’s their job to make sure the financial statements are as accurate as possible. Although it may be hard to check all the information from a company it’s the responsibility of the auditor to sign off that everything is in check.
The auditor must obtain an understanding of the entity and its environment, including internal controls, so that they can identify and assess the risks of material misstatement on financial statements due to fraud or error and design and perform further audit procedures.
“Audit committee members or their agents may proactively examine areas, functions, and personnel where collusive fraud risk is reasonably likely to be perpetrated,” (Zmags). The search for fraud, even if performed in the same location multiple times, may continue until the audit committee feels confident that they have ruled out the probability that fraud is prevalent. One of the biggest risks of fraud is management override of controls, requiring the extensive search for risk in, “journal entries and other adjustments and reviewing accounting estimates for possible biases that could result in material misstatements,” (Nysscpa).
Misappropriation of asserts, better yet, fraud in general, is relevant to and pivotal for accountants, auditors, and people in business for the simple fact that the losses from fraud affects the
A company prepares financial statement to provide information about its financial position and performance. This information is in turn used by a wide range of stakeholders (such as investors, banks, customers, suppliers etc) in making economic decisions with respect to respective economic interest in the company. Typically, in terms of ownership by investment in shares of the company, shareholders though own the company but do not manage it. Therefore, the shareholder and other such stakeholders to get comfort in taking sound decision need independent assurance from the auditors that the financial statements reflect true and fair view of the company affairs in all material respects. Hence, in order to enhance the level of