Every year, college football fans become engrossed with the weekly rankings released after the weekend’s games. Unsurprisingly, the standings often attract much criticism when a team is not placed as high as the fans feel it should be. Three of the most well-known ranking systems, based on algorithms as well as voting, include the Associated Press Poll, the Coaches Poll, and the College Football Playoff rankings. Often, there are discrepancies between each of these polls and fans are quick to make claims of bias when one poll ranks their team lower, or a rival team higher. However, in some cases, the bias claims are not necessarily false. Due to the nature of the polling system, a certain level of bias is simply unavoidable, and a more effective ranking system can only attempt to minimize this bias. One of the well-known polling systems is the Associated Press College Football Top 25 poll. The top 25 teams according to Associated Press are “determined by a simple points system based on how each voter ranks college football’s best teams” (Associated Press). This points system is based roughly on the Borda Count, where the best No. 1 team is given 25 points and each following ranked team is given 1 less point and the total points are added across all the voters. However, the bias comes into play when the 60 individuals vote. The votes are compiled from sportswriters and broadcasters from various states and not every state has an equal number of voted allocated. For example,
Post-season playoffs leading up to the National Championship could replace the human or computer polls with the objective of winning or losing a game.
After another weekend where the Gents swept an SCAC opponent, Centenary rose in all three polls. The American Baseball Coaches Association/Collegiate News poll moved the Maroon and White up to eighth from 12th, while Perfectgame (The only poll to have Centenary ranked all season) moved the Gents up a spot to 10th. Note: These polls do
With the annual debate revived by fans and sportswriters, the involvement of the federal government, and the financial benefit that bowl games offer schools, the issue of wheatear to replace the Bowl Championship Series with a playoff system continues to be one of the most discussed aspects of college football. Most people agree the Bowl Championship Series should be replaced by a playoffs, however there are a few who believe otherwise. The Bowl Championship Series works, and college football has never been more successful, thrilling, popular, or more enjoyable than ever. The Bowl Championship Series is fairer, safer and more effective than a playoffs.
With another academic school year passing by, college football fans were able to join another out the seat nail-biting highlighted NCAA football season. Majority of the people would agree that college football is just as competitive and popular as the NFL. The annual revenue of the top 25 college football teams can reflect that assumption by grossing over 1.2 billion dollars alone. There is one major difference between the two associations which is NFL players are paid off the money they help bring in and college student athletes are not. Providing scholarships to the athletes isn’t enough anymore if the NCAA Football wants to perceive themselves as a money making competitor, and not reward the athletes that helped bring in that type of money.
The second part of the Bowl Championship Series formula is the two polls. One comes from the associated press and the other comes from coaches around the league. The Associated Press polls are organized by a number of different newspapers, magazines, and media. While the NCAA football coaches put together the Coaches poll. “This is probably the most critical element of the four because it has only two subsets (the media and coaches polls) to be averaged” (Edwards). The polls are run similarly to the computers; the two ranking are simply averaged together. “The impact held by each poll is greater than that of any one computer or any one opponent. It is no coincidence that the top two poll teams have played for the national title in both years of the
To go into a deeper meaning of these numbers, it is necessary to understand what the NCAA truly does for the colleges and their players. The 60% that is given to the
As the actual selection of schools progresses, members use the Rating Percentage Index (RPI), to weight teams according to season long productivity. The RPI index is also a prominent factor in the final seeding. This is actually a very detailed formula.
As winter comes to an end and spring approaches, so does the National Collegiate Athletic Association's (NCAA) March Madness frenzy. Since it's inception in 1939 this tournament has gained increased popularity among gamblers and fans alike to become the second most popular tournament in the US after American football's Super Bowl. Every year the madness begins the second week of March and ends the first week of April. Millions of fans across the states eagerly watch as 68 teams race to win college basketball’s biggest prize. This paper will look closely at two of NCAA Division I teams, the Oklahoma University (OU) Sooners men’s, and the Texas Longhorns (TL) women’s programs. It will first break down the tournament revenue brought in to the
Two heated debates arise when considering faults in modern-day college athletics. The first is in college football whether or not a playoff system should be implemented in order to determine a definite Bowl Championship Series (BCS) Champion. This major issue in college football has been temporarily solved with the approval of a four-team playoff starting in 2014 and ending in 2025 (Dinich 1). Though it remains highly exclusive to the top four ranked teams at the end of the season, there lies an opportunity to grow its structure. Second tier, Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) expanded the playoff from 16 teams to 24 teams by giving the top eight seeds a bye in round one. The second most controversial question recurring in college
Over the years, changes have been made to the postseason of NCAA football. There have been two major types of game series: the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) and the College Football Playoffs (CFP). The BCS was introduced to have the best teams in the nation voted to secure spots in bowl games, determining who is the best team of that year. The CFP let all games in the regular season help a team reach the playoffs and play in the championship game to be declared the NCAA champions. Although many people claim that the CFP’s are the best option for the NCAA, many people argue that the BCS is the better choice to conclude the football season, which leads to think if the change to the CFP was the right choice. The BCS should be reinstated because of its ability to have the top contenders for national champion play each other in order to be the best in the NCAA.
Dummitt provides the reader with many different examples and instances to think about. Although with this comes a thought about biases and faulty reasoning. With Dummitt’s piece being an opinion one, this means that a bias form the writer that can come out in the writing. When thinking about the type of piece that Dummitt is writing about their can defiantly is a bias and this does show. Dummitt has a way of thinking about why we do not agree with Granatstein therefore he will have a bias on what examples he uses because he want to back up his way of thinking about activism. When reviewing Dummitt’s article and the points and examples he gives the question remains was it enough to persuade the reader? When thinking about the examples that are
Living- In today’s society, many people tend to base their happiness on how much money they have. They begin to put focus on things that don’t have lasting value, like money and wins your team has. People tend to put each other down and make disrespectful remarks if their football team wins and even if they lose. Every Saturday, many Americans travel to tailgate’s and watch their favorite college football team compete. Many Big Ten football coaches like Jim Harbaugh, Urban Meyer, and Mark Dantonio make a significant amount of money coaching college football. I decided to look at the difference between the amount of money these coaches make and the number of games they won in 2016.
The latest version of the College Football Playoff rankings has been released. We’re one week closer the National Championship, and virtually nothing is any clearer than the previous weeks. The top four teams in the rankings remained unchanged — Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson and Michigan — and most experts agree that Alabama is a virtual lock to stay at the top. The rest of the party, especially the Big Ten representative (s), is very much up in the air.
From the first two national champions, Rutgers and Princeton, to last year’s debateable Auburn national championship winning team, college football has always had difficulties deciding national champions. The BCS National Championship game was thought to give a less prejudice opinion on which teams play in the championship game than humans did. However, it has stimulated more controversy in college sports than Cal-Stanford “The Play.” The problem with the BCS teams is, it chooses two teams that are based on profit, popularity, and record. The BCS is in need of replacement by a playoff system because with a playoff system college football teams have more of an opportunity to show themselves.
Bias is a discernibly human quality; like all things human in nature, there lies deep in our consciousness values, axiology’s, and prejudice. These ‘biases’, rather worldviews, create within each person their own rose coloured lenses with which they perceive, and more importantly, influence the world. To look at how bias can occur both blatantly and subtly in writing, three distinct forms will be analyzed; Linguistic Biases,