preview

The Black Cat, By Edgar Allan Poe

Decent Essays

The Black Cat was first printed on August 19, 1843, in a Philadelphia newspaper, the United States Saturday Post. It was composed by the ever famous, Edgar Allan Poe (born Edgar Poe; January 19, 1809 – October 7, 1849). Since the composition was written during the beginning wave of the American Temperance movement, and because of its relevance and relatable content, it can be looked at as a Temperance narrative, meaning that it demonstrates the perils of alcohol and urges the government and society to prohibit its manufacturing. The narrative is confronted as a reluctant, guilt-driven, confession of a criminal on death-row. The narrative is penned as a first person narrative, with an unknown narrator. The narrator has murdered first his pet …show more content…

The madness has only just begun. Yet, sorry to say, Pluto does not remain so fortunate to keep off the misuse. The narrator first addresses his use of alcohol when describing his initial act against Pluto. He states that he was drunk when he “seized him; when, in his fright at my violence, he inflicted a slight wound upon my hand with his teeth. The fury of a demon instantly possessed me. I knew myself no longer. My original soul seemed, at once, to take its flight from my body; and a more than fiendish malevolence, gin-nurtured, thrilled every fibre of my frame. I took from my waistcoat-pocket a penknife, opened it, grasped the poor beast by the throat, and deliberately cut one of its eyes from the socket!” (Norton, pg. 696) He blinded his cat! He had taken the beings that he loved and attacked them, his wife and pets. In modern times, we would have locked him up in a padded cubicle. He blamed his actions on his irritation. He claimed the cat caused this irritation, but how? The cat committed no act deserving of such cruelty, nor did his wife. The evidence indicates to his intoxication. He stated that once he understood what he had done, he drank his guilt in wine. It was all so predictable. He acted out …show more content…

He still blamed outer forces for the deeds. He later states that it was human nature that forced him to practice what he knew was faulty. He attempts to win over the reader that though unexplainable, his actions should be intelligible. “Have we not a perpetual inclination, in the teeth of our best judgment, to violate that which is Law, merely because we understand it to be such? This spirit of perverseness, I say, came to my final overthrow.”(Norton, pg. 697) Joseph Stark gives an explanation of the narrators reasoning in his article, “A person's choice to sin does not precede the existence of perversity; rather, the "spirit of PERVERSE-NESS" already in the heart causes the person to sin. Hence, in essence, the narrator offers a very traditional theological solution to the problem of motive; he assigns it to the perversity of the human heart.”(Stark, Joseph. "Motive And Meaning: The Mystery Of The Will In Poe's 'The Black Cat'.") This in pedestrian terms is complete nonsense. The narrator cannot cast away his responsibility so easily. Sin lives in everyone. Since biblical times, humans have faced temptations of the heart. These temptations do not justify throwing in to such affairs. Would you kill

Get Access