The Contemporary Advocates Of Liberalism

2281 Words10 Pages
In the thoughts of the contemporary advocates of Liberalism, one of the most noticeable and extensive accomplishments of the Early Modern time period is the expression, protection, and justification of civil liberties including the ability to run for and attain office. From the seventeenth century to present day, a number of distinct argumentative policies and approaches have been established in order to defend the common civilian’s ability to attain political office. Over the past several decades, great advancements have been made in order to allow minorities and even females to run for office. Politics and religion are two of the toughest matters to deliberate with people of any area. The only item more problematic to have a heart-to-heart about than politics and religion is the practice of taking religious means and interpretations into the political jurisdiction. Some of the most controversial and newest topics in present-day society are those that are deeply affected by religious means such as abortion, legalization of same sex marriage, and warfare. Richard Rorty and Alan Stout have very conflicting views over when and if it is socially acceptable to bring religion into a discussion over public concerns. Although neither philosopher prohibits the practice of religious support in an argument, Rorty believes that using religion in the conversation dealing with public concern is ignorant, senseless, and irresponsible.1 Rorty believes that religious reasoning is not a
Open Document