The Curse Of The Poisoned Pretzel Analysis

A mixture of excessive food involvement and analysis of personality produce The Curse of the Poisoned Pretzel. This tale has a theme of food, mainly bubblegum, and the often manifestation in the text of this theme is practically absurd. Even though this story has a ludicrous amount of bubble gum, it can be analyzed past this seemingly childish story to reveal human psychological tendencies. These tendencies are partially responsible for the perception of Skidmore's guilt. Skidmore is described in

completely jealous and despising the other. Commonly this leads to several things such as arguing, fighting, or to better put it, leads to betrayal. Betrayal, a common theme among siblings, say one thing do another, it's inevitable. In "The Curse of the Poisoned Pretzel", Skidmore (creepy brother) is accused of murdering his brother Manchester (snack knacker), yet did he do it? The author of this story portrays interesting attributes to compell readers to point fingers towards Skidmore without actually

life. In the excerpt from the story The Curse of the Poisoned Pretzel, author Paul Haven gives important background information about Skidmore's brother, Boodlebrooks. He enlightens readers that Boodlebrooks is a well known man, who makes several people joyful, and is a generous person. Although it is proven that he is a good man, Skidmore has a built up hatred for his brother. It is evident that Boodlebrooks death was by Skidmore's invention of the pretzel, and clearly shown by Haven that Skidmore

In the story "The Curse of the Poisoned Pretzel" by Paul Haven, the author encourages the reader that Skidmore Boddlebrooks is guilty of poisoning his brother, Manchester Boddlebrooks by convincing him to be the first to try "his" new invention called the "pretzel." In this story, the author, Paul Haven does not actually state that Skidmore was guilty of killing his brother. Unlike his older brother, Manchester Boddlebrooks who was very friendly, generous, and had a kind smile, Skidmore Boddlebrooks

3.2.84). Or, in other words, the wrongdoings a person commits are more likely to be remembered than any noble acts they may have committed. Therefore, assuming the guilt of an unproven "criminal" is nothing new, as the short story "The Curse of the Poisoned Pretzel" by Paul Haven clearly displays; the author develops a case against his subject without ever stating that it is actually true. Haven writes about the suspicious death of a man by

Haven was the author of the story above and it never provides any actual words saying that Skidmore did the crime of murdering his brother by poisoning the pretzel he ate, but it does provide many facts of how it most likely was him and that is what made me think it was Skidmore. I will explain what in the story of "The Curse of The Poisoned Pretzel," made me believe that SKidmore killed Manchester to get the money. A case of a man murdered by his brother was never brought to justice, it was said to