The Dangers of Buying Drugs Online
Buying drugs always poses a serious risk, even if you know your dealer extremely well as a person. However, many people struggling with drug addiction have fallen to buying drugs from online marketplaces. While this may seem like a relatively low-risk way to get drugs, it comes with its own set of dangers. Don 't fall a victim to this potentially life-ruining situation.
The Market Is Not Regulated
Obviously, black market drug markets are never regulated. But online drug markets are even less controlled than in-person markets. Among the multiple online drug selling websites, there is no telling what is actually going on and how the site operates. Although they circumvent any laws by utilizing Bitcoin payment, there 's still a major risk in using them.
For example, although most sites claim privacy is at a premium, it 's still possible to hack these sites. And the government is well-aware of these sites and are more than ready to jump on anyone that they can find using them. The privacy tools may help keep you safe for a period of time, but it 's almost assured that you will eventually get caught.
And that 's just on the major black market sites. Buying drugs from other online sources (such as classified ads or online forums) is just asking for trouble. Who is the person you 're buying from? Can you really trust someone who won 't share their name with you? After all, you 're taking a major risk dealing with someone who could literally be
Even though there are cameras and other things to watch and collect our data for the government I still so not feel safe because there are hackers who can also collect data from us and know what we are doing. They can also still out identities and cause problems for us and the county.
Criminal organizations operating from South America smuggle cocaine and heroin into the U.S. via a number of routes.
Correspondingly, pharmaceutical opioids are not the only narcotics consumers can get their hands on. It is said that heroin, an illegal but natural opiate, “... scheduled 1 controlled substance in the United States…” (AmericanAddictionCenters) Taking heroin puts consumers at a high risk for addiction and abuse. Although heroin is a very dangerous drug it does dull pain, impair cognition and the senses, increase sedation, and slow functions of central nervous system. It is stated that “... heroin is the fastest-acting opiate.” (AmericanAddictionCenters). Heroin is described as a brown, or white powder or sticky substance that may be snorted, smoked, or injected, giving consumers a sense of “rush” or “high” that comes very rapid and very intense. Due to the fact that prescription opioids are becoming more expensive and less accessible many people turn to heroin, a much cheaper opiate. Not to mention, but three out four consumers who first started off by taking prescription medication who then became abusive of them now look towards the “high” of heroin. It's no coincidence that opioids, illegal or not can cause severe damage to the consumer that may even lead to deaths due to overdose. Above all, “heroin and other opioid drugs interact with the dopamine levels in the brain,which is what causes the burst of pleasure associated with their use.” (AmericanAddictionCenters) Clearly the abuse of any drug leads to drug tolerance, dependence, and last but foremost addiction.
However, the same technology that empowers the general public also empowers criminals and terrorists. Is it worth it to compromise the privacy of the general public in order to monitor the behavior of a select few potential criminals? Thus far, the consensus has been 'no'; every publicized effort by law enforcement to introduce general surveillance to the Internet has been met by loud public outcry. [Riley] The public simply will not permit law enforcement to do any form of monitoring that is not accompanied by probable cause and a search warrant.
The opium epidemic is leading many Americans down a path that will ruin not only their lives but their loved ones also. “Safe Injections Sites” will only raise addiction rates and opium consumption in the United
Privacy is something that most people believe is not possible on the internet, but with the correct knowledge it can be possible. In Nicholas Carr’s essay “Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty”, he states that “It is very easy to find information about people on the internet, even private things that people don’t expect others to be able to see” (538). People don’t realize that what they do online can affect their personal lives such as their credit score, the ads that are recommended to them, and even the cookies in their computer. While Carr may have great points, he may not have considered the ways people do have privacy. There are some ways to protect browsing, people just need to know how. Most browsers have a mode that allows people to visit sites without being tracked. There’s no history, and no cookies.
Today there are many different drugs in circulation. Those drugs are not always used properly or legally. Opioids present a contradiction in legal history along with pharmaceutical history. Opioids have a long history, starting with the creation of heroin, as a cough suppressant. Since then the federal government and FDA have stepped in to remove heroin from the public and come up with new medicines that seem to mimic the effect of heroin but be safe enough to sell on a public scale. Unfortunately even as medicines are made for public use, these medications are still proven to be prone to addiction and even overdose. These FDA approved opioids are gateway drugs to heroin. There is a pattern among those
Often addicts will get their fix from an illegal drug known has Heroin, a street drug that contains opiates. In some cases, opioid addicts will steal the drug from pharmacies or patients or will even obtain prescriptions from unethical doctors. There are also some instances where doctors are tricked into proscribing opioids to people that provide fake documents.
The Prescription Drug Marketing Act of 1987 also fell into the category of making sure people don’t sell their personal prescriptions. This is a problem most often with controlled substances. It is also there to ensure safe and effective medications. When people sell their prescription drugs on the street they can tamper with them and you won’t know until after you take it, which is why it is
Jeffrey Reiman states the following on behalf of his solution, “When drug addicts cannot obtain their fix legally, they will obtain it illegally. Because those who sell it illegally have a captive market, they will charge high prices to make their own risks worthwhile” (Jeffrey Reiman, 213). In other words,
There are two models of drug dealing, which are called freelance and business models. The difference between the two is that the freelance model is a much smaller organization than the business model. A freelance model is usually one drug dealer in a small operation, where the business model is a much larger operation with more various types of drugs being sold. Freelance dealers tend to only sell marijuana and hallucinogens, like LSD and Ecstasy (Levinthal, 2012). Business dealers will tend to sell whatever drugs are most popular at that time. Freelance drug dealers are usually drug users themselves so they make a small profit since they are using the drugs that could be instead sold to the buyers. They also usually established some
Drug trafficking is the worldwide illegitimate trade, which involve the cultivating, producing, distributing and the selling of materials that are subject to the drug proscription laws. There are a number of drugs which are trafficked into the United States. These include, but are not limited to heroin, marijuana and cocaine. The system of drug trafficking in the United States as well as in other countries and continents remains very complex. Although the government and non-government bodies have set important laws to exclude the practice, drug trafficking has been a disturbing problem for many years. Many people who venture into this dangerous and prohibited business do it in search for money. It has been a belief that drug trafficking gives people a
The handling of drugs is not safe, whether it is the back alley deals, or the people killed in drug heists. Since 2006 more than seventy thousand people have been estimated to have died in the drug war. This all comes from the lack of supervision in handling of drugs with their distribution, and use. Problems most people illegal drug users face are the quality of the drugs they purchase. Often people lace drugs with other ingredients to either improve or alter their effects. Sometimes suppliers lace drugs with substitute products to spread out into more units
The words, “Arguing that you don’t care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say” were said by Edward Snowden who is a computer professional in America. Similarly, the essays “Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty,” “Web Users Get as Much as They Give,” and “Facebook Is Using You” from Nicholas Carr, Jim Harper, and Lori Andrews respectively points out that the internet privacy is good and bad. However, the articles by Carr and Andrews are based on the negative side of the internet privacy, which means that the internet privacy is not good. On the other hand, Harper’s article is based on the positive side of the internet privacy, which means that the internet privacy is good and scary, but people need to be careful of their own information and browsing histories, and websites. Jim Harper’s essay is more relevant and reasonable than the Nicholas Carr and Lori Andrews’s essays. However, Harper seems more persuasive to readers because he believes that the internet is good if people use it in a right way, whereas Carr and Andrews believe that the internet is not good at all.
Privacy is something that is valuable, and gives trust to both sides. Everyone is endowed with some degree of privacy, right? The debate of the topic privacy versus security has been going on for a while. Most people believe privacy is more important, giving people the chance to be relaxed without anyone watching them, literally or figuratively speaking. Governments believe that security is more important, claiming it will help with terrorism and lower the crime rate. If we allow this to happen, then as an example, the government could monitor our phones conversations, what websites we visit, the games or programs we download, even where we go throughout our day by tracking us on the GPS unit in our smartphones.