Josephine Tey’s The Daughter of Time is a historical novel that looks at the belief that
Richard III, King of England, murdered his two nephews in order to maintain his power. This novel also supports the belief that the “truth comes out through time.” In the novel the main character, Grant, is concerned with what he believes is a unknown fact of whether or not the long ago King of England was guilty. Throughout his search for the answer Grant discovers many history books which all tend to view Richard in different ways. It is from these different views of the same man, that one can draw the conclusion that bias plays a major role in the validity and credibility of documents and personal accounts. So what is the role and in what ways
…show more content…
Personal accounts and documents are often overlooked or considered unbelievable because they cannot be considered valid due to the bias opinions of the writer. As historians many find this discouraging because they have no account of what really happened and only have what can be read from the writings of others. In the media bias plays a role in the validity of certain things. An example, just one out of the many, where bias plays a role in the credibility of certain events is the Pocahontas story. With out going into too much detail it is safe to say that the Disney version was very much altered from the real version. Pocahontas was a nickname for “the naughty one” the girls real name in this legend was Matoaka. [visit http://www.powhatan.org/pocc.html to see what is being referred to]
If bias continues to effect how valid certain past documents are, the documents which help to base our future, than what do we as historians have to go on?
When one takes The Daughter of Time and looks closely another name for daughter one may come up with is truth. The truth is what eventually evolves after time. “The truth comes out through time,” is a statement which this book The Daughter of Time demonstrated very well. It showed how
Grant found evidence to support his belief that Richard the III was in fact innocent. It took many years for someone to realize this but that is the role of time in this case. Grant used information from books, which had been
I had heard them all many times," Grant says (p. 33). This church and community that the women around him are all involved in just seem to Grant to be the same thing, a vicious circle of submission. It is not until Grant learns to put some faith in these women who are trying to make him realize that he can change and become a fully realized man, even if he just thinks they are all bending to the pressures of white
Although I believe Grant had many small turning points, one of the more noticeable ones was around chapter 17 where he suddenly didn't feel so angry anymore. He even mentioned it, realizing how fickle he could be, "Between Monday when I talked to Miss Emma, and Friday, when I visited Jefferson again, something happened inside me, and I wasn't so angry anymore" (Gaines 125). He goes on to wonder what changed him, if it was Christmas or if it was just him. I believe this was a critical moment for him because, after the realization, he became more curious and was more willing to help Jefferson and his situation. Grant paid more attention to the details involving the jail and lit a spark in Jefferson causing him to get mad and act like a human
The bias may also be removed by the use of multiple sources of information as well as addressing the relevant ethical and professional
Initially, Gaines uses the characterization of Grant’s view on his job to exemplify that when one has no sense of justice, they can not make a difference in their given world. After receiving a college education, Grant returns to his hometown to teach,
The real tragedy of Richard III lies in the progressive isolation of its protagonist. From the very opening of the play when Richard III enters "solus", the protagonist's isolation is made clear. Richard's isolation progresses as he separates himself from the other characters and breaks the natural bonds between Man and nature through his efforts to gain power.
Grant believes this is false because they were still the boys’ five sisters between him and the throne. The research worker’s version states that Richard arranged for a requiem mass at York to which all the nobility were summoned and then took on oath of loyalty. Oliphant believed that Richard III was a monster. Grant questioned the various tales and versions of these historians above and believed that there were other sides to the story. Eventually, Grant figures out that Richard III had nothing to do with the killing of his brother’s children and that they probably survived him and were murdered by Henry VII. This was because it was believed that it would defeat the whole purpose of the murder if people didn’t know the boys were
This quote can also give the reader a lot of insight to what kind of person Grant really is. This quote portrays him as being a very selfish man and this character trait is shown throughout the entire story. Grant refuses to do anything that does not benefit himself including going to educate a dying man because he feels that it is not worth is education. Grants selfish ways are also shown with the way he treats his girlfriend Vivian. He is constantly asking her to run away with him to make himself happy ignoring the fact that she has children that she has to take care of. The quote also analyzes him as being a very angry bitter man. Grant gets angry with his aunt for asking him to do something simple for her but he feels this is too much for
History is often regarded as strictly defined and unyielding, particularly by those who uphold the rationalist view that it is possible for a human being to objectively record observations of an event. However, the romantic view of reading history is more in line with the reality that all nonfiction literature is subject to the bias of those writing it. The romantic approach embraces what those fixated on their rationalist views try desperately to ignore, which is the fact that history is fundamentally a record of an individual’s personal experience. To learn from a historical account, one must treat an author’s bias as an opportunity to uncover “truths” that can be even more meaningful than the unattainable accurate representation of facts. A primary example of how history can be obscured by writers is the way in which two Englishmen, William Bradford (1590-1657) and Thomas Morton (1579-1647), provide two very different accounts of the same events in Of Plymouth Plantation and in New English Canaan respectively. Both men are affected by the desire to promote their beliefs and to make their tales appear authentic; therefore, both accounts are biased. After evaluating the two authors’ backgrounds and beliefs and how they affect their writing, as well as the discrepancies within the two narratives, a critical reader may regard Morton’s account as more credible. Personally, it was not the inconsistencies in either account that were
Grant shows being a powerful figure through the knowledge he not only has, but what he gives to others, that ends up changing the outcome and quality of their life. Early on, Grant was not a motivated to help others out at all. In this small Louisiana city, Grant is the only black that knows how to read, write, and talk like the white do. Doing this he has become a teacher, but what he does not find out until closer to the end of the book is that he can do
However, bias does not, in and of itself, produce a subjective, invalid or unfair evaluation. It’s likely to still achieve an objective, credible and fair evaluation with the realization that we are biased individuals. Consequently, we need to be aware of how our views, values and experiences impact our selection of programs, stakeholders, methods, interpretations and results
The Machiavellian Villain Shakespeare’s early plays deal with historical moments from the English throne. His morality and revenge plays can be seen as historical records of kings who are legitimate or illegitimate to rule Britain. These plays represent the influence of Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince on Shakespeare. Shakespeare’s early plays explore the idea of a Machiavellian villain of Elizabethan drama.
The crowning of Richard III marks the turning point from his rise into power to his demise. Up until he becomes king, Richard is the underdog – albeit, a ruthless and evil one. Thus far, the entire play has been focused on Richard’s attempts to assume power and seize the throne. However, once he becomes crowned King Richard, the focus of the play shifts to Richard’s attempts to maintain power and hold the throne. Essentially, the challenge for Richard is no longer gaining power, but keeping it. It is this new struggle that, ultimately, redefines his allies and, more importantly, changes both Richard’s personality and the audience’s sympathy for him.
Winston Churchill, the British Prime minister during World War II once said that, “History is written by the victors”. This is an idea that has piqued the interest of many individuals throughout history. It is an idea that challenges historians to broaden their horizons, and to look at something from a purely objective point of view in order to remove bias. However, often times primary sources can come in the form of diary entries or handwritten letters, which can contain opinion. Opinionated sources can give us a view of a certain demographic, or allow us to step into the shoes of the individual or individuals that created the primary source. What place does historical fiction have
Through this internal assessment I have learned about the challenges of bias that historical events pose. Bias is found in archive based-history, through the primary sources that are available, which then easily transfers into the investigation, as it can be very difficult for a historian to stay unbiased when writing.
Similarly, in history where numerous accounts of events are often based on eye-witnesses for what had occurred in the past. It is known that the reliability of eye-witnesses is inherently inaccurate especially to the biases that they encounter. For example, President Trump 's immigrations laws differs in how he wants to limit immigration however, his