Micah Huffman
Mrs. Cutler-Boyd
World Literature 2
18 March 2015
Bloody America
Imagine, just for a moment, a country where the government kills innocent people. Where people kill others for having black skin, the government kills the mentally ill, the government spends billions of dollars killing individuals. Where does this country thrive? Maybe a small third-world foreign country ruled by a cruel and wicked government? Probably an obscure country that no one has ever heard of? No. Believe it or not, the country is the United States of America. The death penalty, Americas’ most ruthless punishment for crime, has always had people overlook it in society. Those who murder in cold blood get the death penalty; but it does not keep people from committing crimes. Billions of dollars, all wasted killing just a few individuals. The death penalty has also claimed many innocent lives.The death penalty should not thrive in American society because it has no deterrence against crime, it could save America billions of dollars, and innocent people die frequently.
The death penalty has no effect on the murder rate in America. Some punishments deter future negative behavior. The death penalty does not deter future negative behavior. “88 percent of criminal justice experts note that the death penalty is not a deterrent against murder” (Gillespie). This large percentage of experts agree that the death penalty does not stop future crime. If the death penalty has no negative effect on the
These statistic, the death penalty will reduce further crimes, are used by some to claim that the death penalty is an ok method of punishment. This is not actually the case. Scientific studies have consistently failed to
The idea of capital punishment deterring crime is difficult to determine; some could rationalize that the death penalty should in theory stop potential murders from committing crimes. However, this rationalization has never been concretely proven. The research into capital punishment’s effect on deterrence is immense; however, the majority of research on this issue has differential findings. Although some research suggests conclusively that capital punishment deters crime, others found that it fails to do this. Understanding deterrence, the death penalty, and the results of
Another issue related to the subject involves whether or not capital punishment actually deters criminals from committing crimes. Most people think that the death penalties primary function is to deter others in the future from committing similar crimes. There is evidence that at times capital punishment does deter. However, there are those or cite evidence or opinion that the capital punishment does not achieve its desired effect. The majority of this paper will focus on whether capital punishment actually deters crime.
The use of the death penalty has brought peace of mind to our citizens. Though through the mid nineteen sixties until the early nineteen eighties only about six death penalties actually took effect. When the number of executions dropped, the murder rate rose from 5.6 per 100,000 people to 10.2 which is almost double the murder rate. A society cannot live in fear but needs to live in reassurance and protection. As of nineteen ninety-nine, the murder rate dropped dramatically to 5.7 because the execution rate increased to 47 executions. Pearce, Matt. "Counterpoint: Defending The Death Penalty." Points Of View: Death Penalty (2014): 6. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 23 Sept. 2014. This demonstrates the deterrent effect capital punishment has on society. The result is deterrence shows if one kills then one will be punished for their actions and crime.
“A recent study by Professor Michael Radelet and Traci Lacock of the University of Colorado found that 88% of the nation’s leading criminologists do not believe the death penalty is an effective deterrent to crime. The study, Do Executions Lower Homicide Rates? The Views of Leading Criminologists, published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Crimonology, concluded, “There is overwhelming consensus among America’s top criminologists that the empirical research conducted on the deterrence question fails to support the threat or use of the death penalty.” A previous study in 1996 had come to similar conclusions.”
Deterrence has been the backbone of the United States justice system for a long time now, yet does deterrence truly work? When people plan, or commit violent crimes are they considering the immediate consequences of their actions? Offenders do not typically weigh the penalties they may receive after committing a serious crime. Keeping this in mind, increasing the severe ness of punishment, ultimately, will neither decrease or increase the amount of crimes committed in the United States. Death penalty does play a larger role in the deterrence of criminal acts. The death penalty has been a hot topic regarding whether it should be a legal punishment or not. Many arguments arise from this topic including: is it moral of the state to take a life? Or what act of crime is deserving of the death penalty? And how much of a role does religion play into the decision of the death penalty? Deterrence plays a major role in the discussion of death penalty. No one wishes death upon themselves nor would be satisfied with death by the justice system. The death penalty ultimately does deter major crimes in the sense that a
Capital punishment raises the very difficult question whether or not it is ethical to kill a convicted criminal. People who oppose the death penalty often argue mistaken identity and wrongful conviction. They argue that long-term imprisonment is the better course of action, because it allows for the possibility that if a mistake was made in the conviction of a suspect, they would be able to correct it without ending the life of an innocent person. They also state that the threat of the death penalty is not a deterrent and people will commit crimes regardless, as often, criminal behavior is committed with the sense that they will not get caught. People who support the death penalty often state that the death penalty is a deterrent, far more than just prison time. They also argue that the death penalty could actually save lives because when a death penalty is carried out, there could be fewer crimes committed in the future.
The death penalty is one of the most controversed punishments in the United States. According to The Death Penalty Information Center, 88% of criminologist do not believe the death penalty is an effective deterrent. According to deterrence theory, criminals are no different from law abiding people. Individuals settle on their choices taking into account the net expenses and advantages of every option. There is a basis provided for analyzing how capital punishment should influence murder rates, according to the deterrence theory. Throughout the years, a few studies have shown a connection in the middle of executions and reductions in homicide rates.
4. Lack of Deterrence - The purpose of any punishment should be deterrence from repeating the same act. But, according to the statistics available, the death penalty has not been effective in controlling the homicide rate. The studies have revealed the shocking truth that executions actually increase the murder rate. That means the capital punishment does not deter violent crime. According to a New York Times study, the last 20 years witnessed 48% homicide rate in states with the implementation of capital punishment compared to 23% in the states without capital punishment.
The death penalty doesn’t discourage persons from committing murders. Some may respond that the deterrent value of capital punishment is unproved. But if we
Since the foundation of our nation the Death Penalty has been a way to punish prisoners that have committed heinous crimes, however since the turn of the 20th century the practice of Capital Punishment has been questioned on its usage in America and the world as a whole. The Death Penalty is used in America to punish criminals who have committed murders, or taken the life of an innocent person, and while the death penalty seems like it is doing justice to those who have killed others it is actually being used improperly in most situations, while also hindering our economy and is a means of ending more lives than necessary. The Death Penalty can be a valid source of punishment for criminals in the US however due to the misuse of this power by the government it is a huge detriment to our nation and the people that inhabit it. Because of the fact that Capital Punishment is used unfairly, and ineffectively in our nation it is an obsolete form of punishment and should have no place in the United States justice department.
One of the most frequently cited arguments in favor of capital punishment is that criminals are less likely to commit violent crimes at the potential result of being sentenced to death. However, the evidence doesn’t support this. Even with an increased use of the death penalty in the United States over the last thirty years, there is no correlation between its use and homicide rates. In fact, “States with the death penalty do not have lower homicide rates” (Brook). In other words, the possible punishment of being put to death does not deter individuals
Studies of the deterrent effect of the death penalty have been conducted for several years, with varying results. Most studies have failed to produce evidence that the death penalty deterred murders more effectively then the threat of imprisonment. The reason for this is that few people are executed and so the death penalty is not a satisfactory deterrent. If capital punishment were carried out
For instance, in 2010 the average murder rate of death penalty states was 4.6, while the average murder rate of states without the death penalty was 2.9. In 2009, the rate among death penalty states was 4.9, compared to 2.8 in states without the death penalty. Lastly in 2008, the murder rate among death penalty states was 5.2, in contrast to the 3.3 murder rate of states without the death penalty (Death Penalty Information Center, “Murder Rates Nationally and by State”).This simply proves that the death penalty alone does not diminish crime rates, and may even increase crime rates. In an article by Ernest Van Den Haag, he also argues that the death penalty does not deter crime rates. Since the reinstatement of the death penalty until 1995, 5,760 death sentence judgments had been ruled. As of 1995, only 313 had been executed. The amount of appeals submitted by criminals on death row procrastinates their date for execution for decades if not longer. It is not uncommon for some inmates to die of old age because the capital punishment system is so time consuming and drawn out. Criminals are aware that the actual likelihood of a person being executed is minute, and as a result it does not affect their decision-making in committing crimes (Van Den Haag). Some states have abolished the death penalty for “ordinary” murders, but have retained it for the murder of police and prison staff. Those in favor of the death penalty advocate that capital punishment
In contrast, the question of deterrence can be answered objectively using common sense and statistics. By analyzing different arguments for and against the death penalty, such as the "fear of death" myth, the cost of the death penalty, and the racial and economic bias of the death penalty, it can be shown that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent of crime.