The Debate Over Gay Marriage

Greater social acceptance of homosexuality along with legalization of gay marriage might produce more happiness for homosexuals. Moreover, if gay marriage were legalized throughout the country, then the full benefits of marriage would be extended to homosexuals, including benefits for Married couples that are obtained through tax policy, insurance coverage, and inheritance law. One of the most common non-consequentialist arguments against homosexual sex is that it is Unnatural, which it goes against nature. Natural law arguments against homosexuality And same-sex marriage have often traditionally been grounded in religious viewpoints on sexuality and the sanctity of heterosexual marriage. For example, many Christians and Jews who denounce homosexuality do so on the basis of Old Testament Bible verses such The Old Testament appears to permit polygamy. And the New Testament prohibits divorce. If we reject gay marriage on biblical grounds, should we also reject divorce and permit

Another argument against homosexual marriage is the ability to reproduce. There are many arguments on the idea of homosexuality and reproduction. One of the main arguments is, “Since old people

Forbidding gay marriage is unjustifiable and unconstitutional. “While some are more accepting of less-traditional views on marriage and family life (secular, liberal, unmarried and black Americans), others hold fast to more traditional outlooks (religious, conservative, married and white Americans)” (Amy B. Becker). “Thus, the view of traditional believers is preordained: homosexual acts are sinful” (Haag). The question that comes to mind is this; if the bible says love thy neighbor and to not judge, and the constitutions states we all have equal rights, how are these anti-gay movements justified? Are homosexual sins any worse than the others; can a religious person justify alcoholism or adultery but disagree with loving someone who is of the same-sex. A quote that relates to this situation and is commonly found on social media and clothing is, “Don’t judge someone just because they sin differently than you” (anonymous). Homophobic bullying is a huge problem against the homosexuals and their families. Rimalower and Caren mention a great point, that this bullying not only affects the same-sex couples but their children; believing that the children have a similar sexual preference as the parents. “D’Augelli indicates that up to half of lesbians and gay men have experienced some form of bullying in school and many school problems of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students, such as poor academic

But in “Gay ‘Marriage’: Societal Suicide,” the author says that religious beliefs are what matter because God, created man and woman to marry each other and not the same sex. “History and tradition—and the teachings of Jews, Muslims, and Christians—support the overwhelming empirical evidence: The family, led by a married mother and father is the best available structure for both child rearing and cultural health” (Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide 578). Religion teaches what is morally right and wrong and what God wants. He states that it’s a natural moral of a family to have a father and mother to raise the children. If one is missing, the family is broken and chaotic. The author has a solid claim that relates to society because most people are religious and follow the teachings of their religion.

As far as religious or personal convictions, those opposed to gay marriage seem to rely on the teachings in the bible, as well as other doctrines specific to their denomination. For many opponents, the view of gays and their relationships are stained by sin, immorality, frivolity and abnormal behavior.

Religious people argue that marriage is a religious right instead of a civil one. In their eyes allowing same sex couples to marry is a sacrilege, since the US was based on god and still is to some

Traditional Christians and religious conservatives feel that the laws initiated by DOMA are necessary and it “raises the bar for providing illegal discrimination in religion -related disputes” (Drehle, D. V. (2015, April 13)). Reasons against gay marriage include the difference between the parenting of gay couple and traditional couples. They suggest that same-sex couples deprive children of a “normal” family structure and that without biological parents, children would have a harder time developing throughout their

Theologians and religious scholars have been discussing and studying scriptual arguments in favor of gay rights and utimately marriage equality for over SO years. "The textual evidence is ambigous, at best. So the role of the Bible scolars who support

In contrast, the grounds for opposition to same-sex marriage come mainly from the realm of religion. Focus on the Family makes a religious appeal against homosexuality by stating that:

In Europe and the Americas, certainly, centuries of Christianity as the dominant faith have vastly influenced thinking based on the conviction that homosexuality is both unnatural and sinful. This is, moreover, true of all Christian denominations, from the Roman Catholic to the Anglican and Episcopalian. Both in past eras and modern times, for example, Anglican and Protestant scholars consistently cite homosexuality as an aberration and a violation of God 's will. It is held as an orientation that dangerously threatens orthodoxy by ignoring the tenets of the Bible (Sachs, 2009, p. 20). Not surprisingly, Roman Catholic views are at least equally as strong, and what has long developed in Western cultures is a widespread social condemnation of homosexuality which, as faith provides a groundwork for civil and legal matters, then become embedded in the societies. In plain terms, there has been an historic and consistent rejection of homosexuality as deviant, contrary to Christian morality, and unhealthy for both individual and society.

The opposition side argues that gay marriage is against the biblical teachings and that it may lead to slippery slope. However, there is no evidence that links gay marriage with breaking the biblical teaching or leading to slippery slope. Gay marriage should not be abolished due to religious grounds but rather it should be appreciated since it follows the grounds of love and longevity and allow people to have a choice in the marriage institution. Finally, marriage should not be defined by sexual orientation or racial background but rather equality, love and

The argument against gay marriage is that biblically marriage was meant for procreation between man and a woman and that the gay marriage was to destroy the traditional family. It is also argued that same sex marriage is morally wrong. In May 2006, a federal marriage amendment law was put up in the United States to pull aside gay marriages only to be rejected in the United States Senate.

From the point of view of Gallagher, marriage is to give a child a mother and a father and to raise them in the best environment possible. She argues that when men a women have a kid and are not married or stay married the family structure falls apart and then is when many bad things happen to more kids like: poverty, welfare dependence, child abuse, sexual abuse, physical illness, infant mortality, homicide, premature and promiscuous sexuality, juvenile delinquency, educational failure, conduct disorders and adult criminality and many others. This is also when children suffer and communities pay the consequences with crime. This is why she thinks that having a good family structure meaning one father and one mother is so important. She

The issue of same-sex marriage in America right now is convoluted since the political culture of each state varies. Marrying the person you love can be either effortless or unbelievably difficult— sometimes even illegal. Although it wasn’t openly spoken about, homosexuality was frowned upon in the United States. Some companies refused to hire people if they knew they were gay. Baker v. Nelson was one of the first court cases in which the legal system was challenged on the topic of same-sex marriage. The conflict originally took place in Minneapolis when Richard John Jack Baker and James Michael McConnell attempted to obtain a marriage license from Gerald Nelson, the Hennepin County District Court clerk. He denied their application because

The outline of the articles is to highlight the important factors which exist in the research of studies focusing on same-sex and heterosexual couples and the challenges they experience with bringing up children. The main focus of the articles is to draw on the conclusion on same-sex couples. When dealing with families of same sex marriages you must put into consideration how families are the same and different from traditional families. In today 's society many of same-sex couples are confronted with social irregular characteristics which may cause many complex issues. The main point is to offer concrete evidence as a powerful influence for inquiries raised by women’s activist and scholars who have contended that the sanctioning of same-sex marriages will fortify the heteronormative establishment of conventional marriage (Lannutti, 2005). I will begin by providing a survey of the inquiries of sociology highlighting the similitudes and contrasts between same-sex and ordinary hetero connections and families. Researchers and supporters of the same-sex marriage concur that the legal ramifications of same-sex marriage should not revolve simply around hetero couples but rather the overcoming of challenges by all couples. The most recent couple of years there have been a great deal of civil debates over same-sex unions and their children and the worry of their family structure 's impact on them (Lannutti, 2005). The literature on family structure has been centered on basic