preview

The Effects of Environmental Factors on the Absorbance of Escherichia Coli

Good Essays

Introduction
In this experiment, the gram negative bacterium Escherichia coli is being subjected to various environmental factors that affect the rate of growth. These factors scrutinized were the different types of nutrients, the intensity of aeration, or the temperature at which it was stored. The purpose of this lab is to determine which factor affects the Escherichia coli the greatest. It is known that these abiotic factors affect the rate of growth the greatest if they remain at the correct conditions for living.
Escherichia coli and other bacteria will go through four phases; a lag phase, log phase, stationary phase, and a death phase. In the lag phase, the bacteria reproduce fairly slowly, as they are preparing for the rapid …show more content…

We took readings every 15 minutes, until the class was over which was at the 90 minute mark.
For the temperature and aeration trials, the test tubes of Escherichia coli with tryptic soy broth (TSB) were measured using identical procedures as the nutrient trials were tested. Before every sample, we had to re-zero the spectrophotometer with a blank test tube, and then we took the reading from the cultured tubes. As we did for the nutrient experiments, we also took the readings from the temperature and aeration samples every 15 minutes. The temperature test tube was prepared by exposing it to room temperature (25°C), another test tube in an oven (33°C), and the test tube in a lab oven which was slightly warmer, at 37°C.
In the aeration samples, one flask was stationary and it was exposed to the atmosphere. The second sample was put in a regular flask, and placed in a shaking water bath. The third sample was placed in an irregular shaped flask, which was also placed in the quivering water bath. After treatment, all the samples were measured on the spectrophotometer, using the same procedure as the nutrient samples and temperature samples.
Results
The results showed that the experimental data did not necessarily display the lowest MGT. For the nutrient data, the MSG had a mean generation time of an hour, the MSGT had a doubling time of less than 13 minutes, and the MSGTYE had a mean generation time

Get Access