The Federalist And The Anti Federalist

Political parties started when Americans took opposing sides on political issues in 1796 at the beginning of Washington's Presidency. The original political parties were the Federalists founded by Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans founded by Thomas Jefferson. One of the issue the parties debated about was should we have a national banks.

Political parties today started to form in the late 1600’s. In 1787, Hamilton and other leaders joined and called themselves the Federalist. The Federalist party is the party which is most qualified for the presidency because the Federalist want a central government, want to avoid foreign affairs, and also want a central banking system. First a strong central governments.

When the United States declared itself a sovereign nation, the Articles of Confederation were drafted to serve as the nations first Constitution.Under these Articles, the states held most of the power; but due to an almost absent centralized government, colonists were ill-equipped to deal with such practices as regulating trade both between states and internationally, levying taxes, solving inter-state disputes, negotiating with foreign nations, and most importantly enforcing laws under the current notion of "Congress". Realizing that there were several deficiencies in the current system of self-government, the states appointed delegates to ratify the situation and come up with a way to attain the aforementioned practices they needed to

The leaders of the Federalist Party were George Washington (but not openly), Benjamin, James Madison,

During the years right after the revolutionary war, the development of the American government was stomped by a clash between two contrasting political perspectives. The Federalist Party, which wanted a strong central government, was led by Alexander Hamilton. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalist Party, which opposed a strong central government, was led by Patrick Henry. Essentially, the anti-federalists believed a constitution would give too much power to the national power government and feared this would create a government reminiscent to the previous tyrannical oppressive British government. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists did eventually make a compromise where the Anti-Federalists agreed they would vote for the ratification of the

At the start of our nation, the political spectrum that was present were the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Constitution written by the founding fathers establishes the precedent for the rights of the people and the common good. It was decided that the Constitution would be a higher law and future laws could not contradict those in Constitution, meaning that those laws listed in the Constitution cannot be overturned, except through Amendments. The rights of the people are protected because they are written down and explained. Through the establishment of a single written constitution the common good was promoted because people were given a reason to be invested in the country as a whole.

Federalists wanted a strong Federal government, however the Democratic Republicans opposed it. The original members of the Democratic Republicans said that, “People would only be safe if ordinary people were in government.” They believed that the people would know what's right and they would make a lot of good decisions. The Federalists however wanted the government to be powerful. Hamilton wrote, “The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge or determine right.” He is right because our founding fathers agreed that if the people were angels there would be no need for a government , guess what we are not angels so we will make mistakes. To help make the people make better decisions Hamilton believed they needed a government above them. The Democratic Republicans also wanted the states to have more power and not the Government, as you can imagine there were more disagreements.

Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist The road to accepting the Constitution of the United States was neither easy nor predetermined. In fact during and after its drafting a wide-ranging debate was held between those who supported the Constitution, the Federalists, and those who were against it, the Anti-Federalists. The basis of this debate regarded the kind of government the Constitution was proposing, a centralized republic. Included in the debate over a centralized government were issues concerning the affect the Constitution would have on state power, the power of the different branches of government that the Constitution would create, and the issue of a standing army. One of the most important concerns of the

The factions will be numerous in large republics, but they will be weaker than in small, direct democracies are easier for factions to consolidate their strength. In United States, faction’s leaders may be able to influence state governments to support insubstantial economic and political policies –as the states, far from being abolished, retain much of their sovereignty. If the framers had abolished the state governments, the opponents of the proposed government would have a legitimate objection. People think that a strong president is incompatible with a republican form of government, however, the strong president best protects liberty when anarchy, faction, and the excessive ambitions of others threaten it. Madison could not possibly have imagined the many avenues available to factions for exercising influence in contemporary bureaucratic politics. Hamilton’s analysis of the presidency in the Federalist Papers argues that as head of the executive branch, the president is provided by the Constitution with sufficient powers to control, coordinate, and energize federal administration. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists alike feared executive power, and it is highly unlikely that a

While the anti-Federalists believed the Constitution and formation of a National Government would lead to a monarchy or aristocracy, the Federalists vision of the country supported the belief that a National Government based on the Articles of the Confederation was inadequate to support an ever growing and expanding nation.

The concept of theory versus reality is a constant in everyday life. Every person has experienced a situation in which the idea in their head was much better than the outcome. All actions have consequences, and sometimes those consequences are worse than others. In the case of the Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists, was the drafting of the Constitution actually worth it in the end? When the colonists first came over seas from Great Britain there was one thing that was vastly agreed on—a change in how government works and runs was necessary for the future of America. Two major groups eventually formed behind this way of thinking, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were under the impression that the formation of a constitution and a strong federal government was needed. On the opposite political end there were The Anti-Federalists, were opposed to the idea of a constitution because they worried that the government and the people running it would become too corrupt and powerful. They also believed that a smaller central government was needed with larger governments at the state levels. This smaller central government would be similar to what was formed under the Articles of Confederation. Both sides bring very good arguments, and it is impossible to truly know whether one side’s plan of government would have been better than the other. But when looking at the facts of where our country came from, and where our country is

Establishing an effective system of government has proven to be an obstacle for centuries. Fortunately, the Founding Father recognized the common flaws of governments, as did many common men in the colonies. Consequently, the ratification of the constitution was vital for a healthy governmental system, though it did bring about much debate and persuasion. There were two main positions which people took during the ratification, those being the Anti-Federalist and the Federalist. The Anti-Federalist were a diverse assembly involving prominent men such as George Mason and Patrick Henry, and also the most unlikely of individuals, those being Farmers and shopkeepers. The chief complaint about the Constitution was that it confiscated the power from the sates, thereby robbing the people of their power. Oppositely, the Federalist believed in removing some control from the states and imparting that power to the national government, thus making America partially national. Throughout this debate, many letters were shared between the two sides, and eventually, it led to the federalist winning over the colonies.

The Anti-Federalist put up a long and hard fight, however, they were not as organized as the Federalists. While the Anti- Federalist had great concerns about the Constitution and National government, the Federalist had good responses to combat these concerns. The Federalist were and for the Constitution and feel the Article of Confederation were not worth ratifying, these should be scrapped altogether. They felt that the Articles limited the power of congress, because congress had to request cooperation from the states. Unlike the Anti-Federalist, the Federalist organized quickly, had ratifying conventions, and wrote the Federalist papers to rebut the Anti- Federalist arguments.

In conclusion, the first political party system emerged from the ratification of the Constitution. There were two political parties namely, the Federalists who were proponents of powerful central government, and the Anti-Federalists or the Democratic-Republicans who were proponents of states’ rights. Starting from the election of Jefferson up to the succeeding years until 1820, Democratic-Republicans dominated the political party system, ending the Federalist Party. However, Democratic-Republicans were further divided into two political parties, the Democrats and the National

enough society where people are able to voice their opinions. This freedom is due to the rights guaranteed in the constitution, every individual can make their ideas known. Needless to say, people with similar views and ideas tend to form groups together, called Political Parties.Political Parties can be defined as an assembly in which individuals gather through common principles and ethics , therefore, said political factions essentially govern the people. With this knowledge, how were these factions established? What was the true purpose of their creation ? Moreover, why are there a plethora of parties and what are the circumstances surrounding their creation ?The first political parties in United States history were known as the Federalist