The novel Humphry Clinker is written almost exclusively through one sided letters of correspondence. A majority of the letters presented in this novel are written by the two male narrators of the story, leaving the rest of the space for the female narrators. While the male narrators of Jery Melford and Matthew Bramble are used to offer most of the detail to the novel, the female narrators help to offer portions of substance. The narrators of Tabitha Bramble, Lydia Melford, and Winifred Jenkins are used to offer a deeper analysis and differing perspective of the events that take place, in turn displaying the essence of the story. Each of the narrators have their own individual purpose in the story. When the novel begins, Tabitha Bramble’s letter …show more content…
She is described as Tabitha’s “lady” by Lydia, meaning that she is her maid. Like Tabitha, Win’s letters consist of many instances of misspellings. One example of this is, “…I met with an axident. I dropt my petticoat, and could not get it up from the bottom” (51). Though, while Tabitha’s misspellings are malapropisms, Win’s are mainly due to her lower class background. Being that Win is not related to the family throughout the journey, she helps to offer an outside perspective on their lives. In a letter to her friend Mary from London, Win says “the whole family have been in such a constipation! ─ Mr Clinker has been in trouble, but the gates of hell have not be able to prevail again him” (173) when speaking of how Humphry Clinker was arrested for a crime he did not commit. Win tells of how the family reacted to the news but not her opinion on the matter, at least not directly. This action emphasizes Winifred’s role as a servant to the family. The Bramble/Melford family is the most important because she is in service to them, so she makes an effort to mention their happenings in her letters along with some of her own. Win honors Tabitha to the point where she is constantly defending her and trying to make her look better, just as Tabitha does for herself. When speaking of how Tabitha goes after Lismahago, Win calls Tabitha “a gentlewoman of years and discretion” (341). Win is basically saying that Tabitha …show more content…
Lydia often says things that speak about her sex and how she sees them to act. One instance where Lydia does this is when she says “I have seen enough to believe, that our sex in general make it their business to ensnare others” (289). Not only is Lydia basically saying that all women are nosy busybodies, but that they use that quality to catch others whether it be in a lie or in marriage. The fact that Lydia says things like this is interesting because while her character is saying it, Smollett is the one writing it. With this single line he makes women out to be sneaky and conniving creatures, and through this, wholly disrespectable. Now, Lydia isn’t portrayed to be this way, so it brings up not only the question of class but the question of education as being a factor. Lydia is a high classed woman with an education, so she is made to be better than Tabitha who is of the same class, however with less education. Therefore, it implies that class isn’t a factor in how women act, but their amount of education. Something else Smollett expresses is that women are not strong willed and easy to sway. After Humphry apologizes in nicer clothing for accidentally exposing his bare bottom to Tabitha, Jery observes “this compliment and humiliation had some effect upon Tabby” (97). Tabitha is so easily swayed by a man of good appearance that she is made out to be simple minded. In the end of the
narrator because we only know what she wants us to know, resulting in leaving out important facts. “I did write for a while in spite of them; but is does exhaust me a good deal---having to be so sly abut it, or else meet with heavy opposition.” (Gilman, p326) She is not honest about writing with her husband, and this proves that she is more than willing to tell her story her way.
He, obviously, is the narrator, and the person whom we see the story through. He gives us his opinions on the matters at hand, and we see the book through his viewpoint. The traits described above allow him to be such a great narrator, for he can get people to confide in him, and relay this information to the reader.
Walton, the narrator of the first ten chapters narrates in a very unique way: writing letters. Walton talks about the “expression of wildness, and even madness,” and bases his side of the story off of it.
(2) The narrator knows does not know very much about what is happening because in the story it states in paragraph one sentence one " It looked like a good thing: but wait till i tell you". When i read this I realized that the narrator could
Throughout history, women have been viewed as the less dominant and less powerful gender. Gender has been used as a primary way of signifying relationships of power. In Kindred by Octavia E. Butler, the role of gender in power dynamics in both the 19th and 20th century is explored through the journey of the main character, Dana. In the novel, Dana time travels back and forth in time to the 1800’s and back to her present time of 1976. Throughout her time travel experience, the different roles and powers women held in both the 19th and 20th century are portrayed through the characters of Dana, Margaret, and Sarah.
When first introduced to the narrator, readers quickly pick up on how observant she is to the world around her. However as the novel draws to a close, many quick events take place with little to no explanation or commentary from the
It will take a long time. Years from now, they will still be arranging the pieces they know, puzzling over her features, redrawing her outlines in their minds. Sure that they’ve got her right this time, positive in this moment that they understand her completely, at last. They will think of her often: when Marilyn opens the curtains in Lydia’s room, opens the closet, and begins to take the clothing from the shelves. When their father, one day, enters a party and for the first time does not glance, quickly, at all the blond heads in the room. When Hannah begins to stand a little straighter, when she begins to speak a bit clearer, when one day she flicks her hair behind her ear in a familiar gesture and wonders, for a moment, where she got it. And Nath. When at school people ask if he has siblings: two sisters, but one died; when, one day, he looks at the small bump that will always mar the bridge of Jack’s nose and wants to trace it, gently, with his finger. When, a long, long time later, he stares down at the silent blue marble of the earth and thinks of his sister, as he will at every important moment of his life. He doesn’t know this yet, but he senses it deep down in his core. So much will happen, he thinks , that I would want to tell you.” (291) . This final passage of the novel emphasizes the overall plot and meaning because it looks at the aftermath and the pain of everything that Lydia affected. It marks her influence as the glue
A narrator, who is without a name, tells of his first hand experiences throughout the story. This is in contrast to ‘Miss Brill’ in which narrative is delivered in the third person, with the use of free indirect speech to depict the story and portray the characters. By Wells selecting a first person narrative he draws the reader closer into the character’s mind set. This gives Wells the ability to convey the primary characters full spectrum of emotional thought, from open mindedness to the conflict and fear within him. First narrative provides the reader insight to thoughts and observations therefore adding suspense of the unknowing into the gothic style.
In the novel Fair and Tender Ladies, the character Garnie is one of interest. As a child, he is full of wonder and easily excitable. Garnie is the younger brother of Ivy Rowe, the main protagonist. Garnie is a major character because of how frequently he and Ivy interact and with how she reveals more about her character from talking about him in her letters. When they were little, Garnie refused to play with his sisters Ivy and Silvaney unless he could preach. They would often play funeral and Garnie would deliver a sermon about God. After the family moves to the town of Majestic, Garnie immediately takes a liking to the preacher Sam Russell, as shown by how he goes to get saved on a nightly basis, only to be scolded by Sam for doing so on
They each tell their side of the story, letting the reader into their thoughts. These multiple narrators contribute to help the reader understand each main character from different perspectives and show how and why things happened the way they did. Bailey also uses both a prologue and an epilogue to contribute to the richness of the story, which is a style quite common in the ancient Greek plays. In the prologue, Susan Hazen, Kevin’s mother, tells the reader in retrospect about the morning of the hunt and forewarns the reader of the tragedy that is to come (7). After reading the prologue we know that something horrible will happen, but Bailey leaves us wondering what the tragedy will be. Bailey also incorporates an Epilogue to bring closure to one of the characters.
Before detailing the events that take place between Sheba and the under-aged Connolly, Barbara assures the reader that she is merely the narrator, and that ‘This book isn’t about me’(Heller 4). Therein lies the most significant instance of irony that forms the crux of the narrative in Zoë Heller’s
The narrator was Scout Finch, a five year old girl who lived with her father, brother and Calpurina, the black nanny. Scout narrated the story from a first person point of view using an informal tone with Southern dialect. Readers had the opportunity to visualize the events from a child-like perspective. According to Richard Sullivan “the unaffected young narrator uses adult language to render the matter she deals with, but the point of view is cunningly restricted to that of a perceptive, independent child, who doesn’t always understand fully of what’s happening, but who conveys completely, by implication, the weight and burden of society. There is wit and grace in the telling” (Sullivan, 1960, p.29).
In Steinbeck’s, “The Chrysanthemums,” Elisa is a woman in her thirties who nurtures her chrysanthemums as her husband works out in the world. She yearns for a connection, as she eagerly plants and engages in a conversation with an unknown tinker. As she converses with the tinker, notice how she becomes a strong and vibrant woman, as she passionately becomes one with nature. Both her husband and tinker attempt to put her in “place,” based on society’s view of women (Skredsvig). Feeling overwhelmed with her emotions, she begins to realize her role as a woman in the household and attempts to break free.
If we can accept that Douglas is, in fact, a grown up Miles, then it may be further possible to presume that the unnamed narrator in the prologue is female. Although he is not willing to claim outright that the narrator is female, Michael Taylor in his essay "A Note on the First Narrator of The Turn of the Screw", warns us against "so many years of confident assumption" (722) that the narrator is male. In keeping with James's desire that we allow our imaginations absolute freedom of hand, we might even posit that the female narrator is Flora.
“Who is the narrator? Not a single person because Faulkner uses a first- person plural point of view, "we"; that "we" is townspeople, but only such as are in position to watch Miss Emily constantly for fifty or sixty years; they are anonymous townspeople, for neither names nor sexes nor occupations are given” (Sullivan, 160).