The German Government Sued Over NSA Spying Essay

Some citizens question whether or not the government is legally allowed to do some of what they do regarding surveillance. Due to the PATRIOT Act, federal investigators can obtain a wide variety of information without formal court proceedings, which are normally required. "A congressional investigation revealed that the NSA had been illegally intercepting international communications for more than 20 years, but no action was taken against the NSA to penalize them or prevent this from happening again."(Cauley)

B. Perpetrators were managed economy German Workers' Party leaders, bankers, professors, military officers, doctors, journalists, engineers, judges, authors, lawyers, salesmen, police, and civil servants.

In 2013, a man named Edward Snowden ignited a national debate by revealing that our National Security Agency, or the NSA, has been gathering mass amounts of phone records and other, private, data without consulting the American public. That means American emails, chats, phone calls, online transactions, web searches, or even online medical records can and have be stolen by the government without consent. Using decryption methods, court orders, supercomputers, and technical tricks, the NSA is slowly gaining ground on its war on encryption. All of these things are supposed to be defended by technology companies and Internet Service Providers, but in the article, “Revealed: How US and UK Spy Agencies Defeat Internet Privacy and Security” by James

In John Cassidy's article that depicted Snowden as an individual for his actions, spying domestically was an issue most citizens were shocked about. How can one agency see and watch all everywhere? Upon this declaration that was plastered along news threads and the media, Edward has been named a criminal under the law. His act of courage allowed millions to acknowledge the fact of not believing everything they hear. The National Security Agency's programs are now being questioned because of their dishonesty and lack of accurate information for the public. Because of Edward Snowden's undaunted exploit of private government files, tech agencies have furthered their search for better security so that their users can feel safe even in the midst of mass surveillance. Yet, despite several dangerous targets on his back, Snowden remains to believe in his action being done with pure intentions. Speaking bravely

If the US does not change their viewpoint on spying on innocent citizens lives we might find ourselves in a situation similar to the society present in the novel 1984. Overall, the use of surveillance to control citizens is noticeably present in both 1984 and the present day society as in both cases these governments monitor citizens, turn on those who speak out, and use a paranoia as reasoning to

Edward Snowden is America’s most recent controversial figure. People can’t decide if he is their hero or traitor. Nevertheless, his leaks on the U.S. government surveillance program, PRISM, demand an explanation. Many American citizens have been enraged by the thought of the government tracing their telecommunication systems. According to factbrowser.com 54% of internet users would rather have more online privacy, even at the risk of security (Facts Tagged with Privacy). They say it is an infringement on their privacy rights of the constitution. However, some of them don’t mind; they believe it will help thwart the acts of terrorists. Both sides make a good point, but the inevitable future is one where the government is adapting as

Edward Snowden. This is a name that will be in the history books for ages. He will be branded a traitor or a whistleblower depending on where you look. Many Americans feel that Edward Snowden is a traitor who sold the United States’ secrets aiming to harm the nation. Others believe that he was simply a citizen of the United States who exercised his right to expose the government for their unconstitutional actions. It is important to not only know the two sides to the argument of friend or foe, but to also know the facts as well. My goal in this paper is to present the facts without bias and to adequately portray the two sides of the argument.

The German government holds the most responsibility for the massacre at the 1972 Munich Olympic Games. They deliberately made choices that compromised the Olympic Village’s security and were not prepared for an attack. The government failed to make sure the Olympic teams were safe and that negligence made the abduction possible. Even after the Israeli team was taken hostage, the German authorities botched multiple rescue plans and their sloppiness and unpreparedness caused mistakes that led to the Israeli team’s execution. The main reasons the German government is to blame is their failure to prepare and their inability to respond.

Government surveillance entails the subjection of citizens to arbitrary monitoring by the government thereby impeding their privacy rights. It is a subject that has attracted a fair share of criticism in the American political scene due to issues regarding the citizen’s confidentiality and the willingness of Americans to cooperate with this activity for security purposes. Therefore, this paper explores the legal basis of the privacy rights by making reference to the chapter on Civil liberties. An analysis of the video link is made to determine the integrity of the Supreme Court’s ruling on privacy and the justification of whether Edward Snowden is a gallant whistle blower or a traitor.

In the case of Edward Snowden a former National Security Agency (NSA) subcontractor, who was responsible for one of the most significant leaks in U.S history regarding NSA surveillance programs. During the years Snowden had worked for the NSA, he was exposed to invasive and disturbing practices that violate ones privacy. In this paper, I will argue that Edward Snowden was morally correct to blow the whistle on the NSA’s domestic surveillance practices.

Unless you were hiding beneath a rock in 2014, you saw the nation’s reaction to the release of classified NSA documents by the infamous whistleblower Edward Snowden. Snowden, who worked as the lead technologist for Dell, managed their accounts with the Central Intelligence Agency. It was in this position that Snowden began to notice some classified documents that didn’t make sense. These documents contained information on the National Security Agency illegally spying on their own citizens. It was at this time in 2012 that Snowden began downloading some of these files for himself. It is estimated that he downloaded somewhere between 50,000 and 200,000 files on the espionage efforts of the United States (Borrough, Ellison, Andrews, 2014). Now, Snowden needed to get the files out to the people. He attempted to contact a few media outlets around the world who would not go through the trouble to follow his strict encryption methods. Snowden eventually contacted documentarian Laura Poitras, who had recently written an article on a separate whistleblower that caught Snowden’s attention. Poitras states in an interview with Salon.com that, “…he’d contacted me because my border harassment meant that I’d been a person who had been selected. To be selected –and he went through a whole litany of things — means that everything you do, every friend you have, every purchase you make, every street you cross means you’re being watched” (Carmon, 2013). This connect lead to Snowden being

Nowadays, we living a age of information, everything happens faster than other times. Consequently the interception of information, in other words, the cases of espionage, become one of the biggest worries for the nations around the world. Recently, Edward Snowden, an ex-agent of NSA (National Security Agency) from USA, leaks a largest number of documents containing information about various countries. This leak sparked the warning signal of the countries (Shoichet, 2013).

Whoever in one of the circumstances indicated by article 444 of the penal code, denies, grossly minimizes, tries to justify or approves of the genocide committed by the German National-Socialist regime during the Second World War will be punished by imprisonment of eight days to one year and fine of twenty-six to five thousand

Other anti-German news are all over on the radio. The corner store down the street that the kids hang out often was vandalized for the second time this month. A German day care was broke in and furnitures were stolen. More and more Germans were interned every week. They were all sent to the internment camp in remote countryside. Ukrainians, Austrians, and Hungarians faced the same

“The responsibility for WW2 and the national sentiment of guilt shaped the role of the German politicians and citizens in Europe for decades”(Davis). Germany was put in extreme debt and poverty because of the fall of WW2, this led modern day Germany to feel the guilt for previous events. Many citizens of Europe at the time, felt the impact of the war for many years after. Since the end of WW2, Germany has performed many actions to make up for the destruction of Europe, both physically and emotionally. “Germany realized that in the event that it were to rejoin the international community, it would not run from its crimes but had to confront them” (Rienzi). Because of Germany's big impact on the rest of the world, it felt the need to make up for Hitler's previous behavior. To do this Germany had to make up for the purpose of what had happened in the past, instead of ignoring it. Germany has proven its change, in the fact that it is at this point of time, economically stable. “Germany...has grown to become the fourth largest economy in the world...at the end of WW2...70 years ago the country lay in ruins” (Rienzi). Germany's government has done a lot to prove itself guilt-free, by focusing on its economy and the citizens. “Germany has been trying to come to terms with anti-semitism and has made the denial of the Holocaust punishable by law”(Rienzi). Germany wants