Before the invention of film and television, authors expressed their ideas through language and literature. Just like many others, F. Scott Fitzgerald uses his thoughts and writing skills to portray his opinions and ideas. His novel, The Great Gatsby, is about the morality and choices of the people in the 1920s. Fitzgerald uses color and imagery to evoke feeling in his work, which on the other hand is difficult to accomplish in a movie. Baz Luhrmann, the director of the more recent version of The Great Gatsby, managed to do just that. He directs scenes in artistic ways so the audience sees and understands things we may have not in the book. Luhrmann interprets the characters and the way they act differently as well. When we compare the two …show more content…
Luhrmann does an excellent job of matching Fitzgerald’s methods. Fitzgerald uses color as symbolism. When Nick goes to the Buchanans for dinner, he walks into a parlor and all the windows are open. There are white curtains ruffling in the breeze and it is bright. It looks almost heavenly. Then when we see Daisy and Jordan they are both wearing white was well, seeming to say they are pure, almost like angels. Using color Luhrmann is able to make us think things about Daisy, and get a impression of her. He then has Tom come in and shut all the windows, it suddenly becomes humid and dark, which shows that Luhrmann wants Tom to be seen in a negative light. Tom just ruined the light and heavenly air about the scene and made it dark and gloomy. This creates a bad impression of Tom for us. Luhrmann did a excellent job of matching and interpreting Fitzgerald's imagery and it added a lot to the film. When comparing the the film and book of The Great Gatsby there are many things that are similar and different. When Fitzgerald uses imagery in his piece it adds emotion and symbolism to his piece. When Luhrmann matches his imagery in the film, it makes the film almost artistic. Luhrmann interprets the characters differently as well. He doesn't make Nick as questionable, and Daisy as flamboyant. There are many good changes in the movie that added another layer than the
The Great Gatsby is a novel which critically discusses the ideals of the American Dream and recapturing the past. In the film adaptation, producer Jack Clayton stays very closely to the plot and even quotes the novel verbatim but fails to capture the essence of the themes portrayed in the novel. The text did not translate well into film; some facts are distorted, the depiction of the characters are different, the general ambience of certain settings do not match, and the movie is weighted towards the beginning of the book, with half of the movie based closely on the first two chapters of the book.
The plot and the setting of book and movie are very similar. There was a lot of thins borrowed from the book, but there was a lot changed as well. The movie followed the plot of book very closely and portrayed the setting of the book very well. A lot of the dialogue was borrowed and spoken directly as it was in the book.
Nowadays, there are many books that are often turned into films, and most people enjoy watching the movie of their favorite novels. This case is different. If Fitzgerald, the author of The Great Gatsby, would have viewed the 1974, 2000, and 2013 film versions, he would have described them as lost causes. Many producers over the years have tried to recreate the masterpiece that Fitzgerald made, but haven’t come close to portraying his actual thoughts. However they may fail, Fitzgerald would have enjoyed the 2000 film version of The Great Gatsby best.
The Great Gatsby, written by F. Scott Fitzgerald, is a story about a wealthy man named Gatsby. Gatsby lives a luxuriant life in West Egg of New York. Gatsby’s wealth has an unknown secret because nobody seems to know where his wealth emerged from. Despite of having so much fortune, Gatsby’s true American dream has not been achieved. In the great Gatsby F. Scott Fitzgerald develops Gatsby as a failed American dream to show the impossibility of the American dream in the 1920’s.
There are many differences to be discovered between Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, written in 1925, and the movie directed by Baz Luhrmann in 2013. Clearly, as time drastically changed between the two, it is easy to assume that some aspects of the story have as well. Scott Fitzgerald and Baz Luhrmann both captured the essence of the world in the 1920’s in different ways. These differences can be seen throughout the characters and themes of the story.
“Is Tom most responsible for Gatsby’s death? Daisy? Myrtle? Gatsby himself? Give reasons why or why not each character is implicated in the murder.”
“What is better, the book or movie?” a commonly asked question by many individuals who are curious to know one’s opinion on a novel or film he/she is interested in. The book is usually always better than the movie because the book is more detailed, one gets to know the characters better, and it allows one to be more creative and have his/her own interpretation on what is occurring. In this case, The Great Gatsby is a remarkable 1925 novel written by F. Scott Fitzgerald, which was made into various movie adaptions in 1926, 1949, 1974, 2000 and 2013. Each version takes place in drastically different periods, so each type has its own take on the film, also depending on the director’s vision. This goes to show that the cinema has been trying periodically to recreate F. Scott Fitzgerald’s classic, but the attempts of the movies have mostly failed. In particular, the 1974 film decreases its effectiveness in representing the message that Fitzgerald was attempting to demonstrate in the book, which contributes to the book being significantly better than the film for various reasons.
The society our nation lives in today has developed morals and principles through the lessons experienced from the past. The Roaring Twenties was a time of change and a chance to pave a path for the person you wanted to become. Morals and principles served as guidelines rather than rules and were merely preached that practiced. Thus, the severity of the immoral actions taking place created opportunities for lessons to be learned. In his novel The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald illustrated various moral lessons through the downfall and corruption of various characters based on their immoral actions. The narrator, Nick Carraway is a young man who throughout the
Movie adaptations are widely produced in our modern cinematic world. Many book lovers criticize movie adaptations, proclaiming that it kills the spirit of the story, misses out on critical key themes, and eliminates the reader's and viewer’s imagination. The Great Gatsby movie, directed by Baz Luhrmann and released on May 1st, 2013, is a film adaptation of the book The Great Gatsby, written in 1922 by F. Scott Fitzgerald. The time lag between the movie and the book made some things unacceptable in our society. These changing societal proprietorship motivated Baz Luhrmann to alter the movie to be more suitable for current viewers. Consequently, there are many differences to be found between the book and the movie adaptation, which ultimately led to Luhrmann's movie being critiqued many times by the book’s fans, saying it was nothing like the actual book. Despite the fact that the movie adaptation of the Great Gatsby book follows the overall plot, it fails to show the racism, sexism, and abuse some of the characters withhold. The movie also fails to show the significance of the American dream, the condemnation of the lifestyle of the very rich, and it also annihilates reader’s imagination.
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald is a novel about a rich socialite, Jay Gatsby, who tries to win back his love, Daisy Buchannan. Nick Caraway, Daisy’s cousin, is the narrator who brings the reader through the time of the roaring twenties to tell the story of Jay Gatsby. The 1974 film of The Great Gatsby, directed by Jack Clayton, follows the detailed storyline closely by mirroring it, but also adds and takes away some aspects of the story. There are many comparisons that can be made as well as contrasts through the actor, scenery, music, and script choices for the film.
From the movie plot and the details we can see that the 1974 Robert Redford version is more realistic, and is more in line with the original content, but Baz Luhrman's 2013 version is more fantasy. In my opinion, the reason why The Great Gatsby was made into a film for many times because it is a great story and has a strong sense of the times. When I read the end of the story, the sad ending gives people a feeling of disillusioned, and at the same time, it is an emotion which brand in people’s heart and affects all the people. The whole narrator of the novel is Nick who came to New York with confidence, and he is Gatsby’s neighbor. Nick’s shabby house and Gatsby’s grander mansion form a sharp contrast. What's more, the parties which held in Gatsby’s house attracted Nick’s strong interest in Gatsby. Fitzgerald shows us a society that people honors material success and glory with the exquisite style of writing. Everyone tries to play up with Mr. Gatsby, but at the same time, people envy him. This scene is very good performance in the 1974 Robert Redford version, and the director expresses a vanity and philistine social style as same as we can see in the novel. In addition, there is one scene in the 1974 Robert Redford version which is after Gatsby and Daisy met again, Gatsby wanted to hold her hand. But in the close-up shot, Gatsby cannot hold Daisy’s
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby was enhanced by the dialogue, colors, and scenes used within Baz Luhrmann’s film rendition. The film may not follow the novel as a script, but it does retain all significant information mentioned in the novel. Because Baz Luhrmann’s film retains important information, it enhances and does justice to F. Scott Fitzgerald’s classic
The tale of the Jay Gatsby is not only written by F. Scott Fitzgerald in the novel, The Great Gatsby, but also directed and produced into a movie by Baz Luhrmann. Although thematically similar and entertaining, Luhrmann’s adaptation can hardly compare to the intricate and enchanting words written by Fitzgerald. Many differences fall alongside the similarities when comparing the novel and the 2013 movie of, The Great Gatsby, including characteristics of the narrator, relationships and Gatsby’s death.
The 2013 drama/romance movie, The Great Gatsby, is the second movie adaption made based off the novel written by F. Scott Fitzgerald in 1925. Co-written and directed by Baz Luhrmann, this film received both glory and criticism upon its release. The Great Gatsby is well known for its “Gatsby era” as well as the love encircled between money and power. Without the glitz and glam of this story in conjunction with the forever love Jay Gatsby, a millionaire known for his magnificent parties, holds for Daisy Buchanan, The Great Gatsby would not be as acclaimed of a story. Baz Luhrmann makes sure to emphasize these characteristics throughout the film through his use of symbolism, irony, and imagery.
Putting together a film based on a highly acclaimed literary work, filled with phrasings and lines of dialogue that have been burned into readers minds is hard to do. Producing a movie that keeps the essence of such a literary work and even many of its most elegant lines is very difficult to accomplish, and director Baz Luhrmann has lots of problems with The Great Gatsby. F. Scott Fitzgerald's vivid sentences are nearly as valuable as his dialogue and throwing some of the best lines from the book into a script on the screen isn't the best way to make the most of those moments. Neither is taking imaginative license in several big moments in order to advance the storytelling