preview

The Importance Of Censorship In Art

Better Essays

The connotations associated with any work of art or art medium are those of free individual expression without constraints or limitations. Even without constraints or limitations, artists are constantly under the watchful, scrutinous eye of the public. Each work of art, whether that be a painting, a dance performance, or a musical composition, is innately intended to engage an audience. I believe that captivating an audience with artwork should not be considered an act that should always result in an overall positive reaction from an audience. Instead, works of art should merely strive to make viewers or listeners feel some set of strong emotions, positive or negative. This discussion leads me to argue that due to the entire meaning of art being centered in an artist’s expression, censorship in artwork should not be allowed. People are generally quick to jump to polarized and stubborn conclusions about anything that might cause a public stir. In 2015, composer Jonas Tarm’s piece titled “March u Nebuttya” (“March to Oblivion”) was prohibited from being played by the New York Youth Symphony at Carnegie Hall. The symphony reached this agreement because of controversy surrounding Tarm’s composition about references to the Holocaust and Germany’s role in World War II. Specifically, Tarm included a 45 second reference to Horst-Wessel-Lied, which was the anthem of the Nazi party, within his nine minute arrangement. I think that the decision of the Symphony was oppressive and is a

Get Access