Education In rural communities, the amount of quality education that children receive is mediocre at best compared to those in urban areas. There are less school activities available, higher dropout rates, and projected higher delinquency rates in rural areas.
Lack of qualified teachers. The low quality of education could be influenced by lack of qualified teachers, "rural districts often struggle to find even one qualified teacher per subject" (Fishman, 2015). One of the issues that come with living in a rural area is that no one wants to remain there since individual development or progress is attached to the idea of migrating to an urban area. This, therefore, creates a brain drain; which means the people who are qualified to be in
…show more content…
In fact, in 2010-11, 57 percent of the operating regular school districts were located in rural areas, while 20 percent of districts were located in suburban areas, 18 percent in towns, and 5 percent in cities meaning that children in rural areas make up a large part of the education system and yet they receive a worse education than their better off counterparts ("The Status of Rural Education", 2013). This links to the conflict perspective because government funding is going towards communities and schools that don't necessarily need it compared to schools in rural areas.
Food or Nutrition
Food insecurity is widespread in rural areas, which means children in rural areas have poor access to food. Unemployment or underemployment of an adult is the key predictor of food insecurity, which is higher in rural areas .
Food Deserts.
Food deserts are common in rural areas, meaning the number of grocery stores, markets, and fresh food providers are dwindling down and creating a greater distance between them and urban areas. This leads to children being fed with fast food such as McDonalds and Wendy’s which are not nutritionally valuable foods however, when the nearest grocery store is 15 miles further than a fast food restaurant parents often go with the quicker option rather than the healthier one. From 2007-11 The USDA Food Environment
This means that the good schools can only take in a few students, the proverbial tip of the ice berg. The rest of the students are relegated to schools in which their parents have no faith at all. This is tantamount to dooming these students to failure and being completely unable to do anything about it. The decline in the level of education in the public school system has prompted a lot of parents to opt for private schooling for their children. The problem with this is, of course, finances. Another problem facing the schooling system is the lack of streamlining of services. A comparison is drawn between the schools in the poor neighborhoods and their equivalents in the rich neighborhoods. The difference is astronomical. There is absolutely no coherency between the levels of services being provided in these institutions. Thus, the education system appears to be skewed. This is a worst case scenario situation for a system that is supposed to provide children with equal opportunities at a better life in the
“Education is a major driver of development and is a strong instrument for reducing poverty, improving health, gender equality, peace, and stability” (The World Bank) - so why is it that students are often deprived from an extensive education? In Illinois, education funding has been an ongoing problem. Funding for schools is based on the property taxes where the schools are located, causing those who live in lower socioeconomic areas to receive less educational funding. This is unfair because children who live in lower socioeconomic areas are not able to receive the same opportunities and benefits that are acquired when a quality education is obtained. This is why educational funding in Illinois should be distributed evenly so that every
Education does not just take place in schools. Classrooms are places where many forms of discourses come together. Students and teachers with various forms of knowledge and ways of communicating interact together and unfortunately some ways of knowing and communicating hold more value than others. Sometimes researcher should stop looking at the bigger picture; capitalist economies and the true nature of society should become more of a focus in education research. You cannot hope to understand why students from lower socio economic areas do poorly compared to students whose parents are more affluent unless more is done to understand the prior.
Schools in large city centers are failing faster than schools in smaller cities or towns. People in
Low income communities are most likely to suffer from food deserts due to the lack of money being bought into the community to keep big markets around. As a result, residents may have to travel a longer distance to get to the nearest supermarket, which can be difficult when the person does not have reliable transportation. According to the USDA, it is estimated that about 2.3 million people in low income areas live more than one mile away from a supermarket or do not have their own vehicle (2). Since supermarkets can be further away most people may have to take several buses, taxis and/or trains just to get the nearest grocery store which can get expensive when the person is on a fixed income. In rural area, residents have little to no access to public transportation especially to supermarkets are a distance away.
Making matters even worse, there is often less spending on grade school education in rural areas in Vermont, which tends to lead to students being less prepared to compete for higher paying jobs, again leaving lower paying, often menial jobs.
In this article the author explains how the schools are based on a class system and higher-class areas have better recourses and more classes offered. Higher-class societies have better equipment, new technology, modern facilities, better books, and better teachers. Not only are the school’s educational facilities better the extracurricular activities are also better. For example sports facilities, training facilities, band, art, all because these lower class schools cant afford what these lower class schools can. Students in lower end districts are actually ending up worse off then the higher end students. Meaning attrition rate, drop out rate, sat scores and much more.
A food desert can be defined as an urban area where the residents must travel more than one mile to have access to affordable fresh fruits and vegetables (USDA, 2015). Food insecurity is defined as insufficient quantities of food available or on an consistent basis, lack of resources to obtain appropriate foods, and suitable knowledge of basic nutrition, as well as water and sanitation (WHO, 2016) What this means is that if a person has access to nutritious foods for an adequate diet, but lacks the proper knowledge to use those foods in a healthy or nutritious way, then that person has a degree of food insecurity. When a person lacks all three components (access, resources, knowledge), they are said to be severely food insecure.
Food insecurity is a determent to health that has become more prevalent in low-income areas of the country. Food security is an important aspect of public health in which greater evidence is showing that food insecurity as a direct link to poor health. Food insecurity can be define as “the inability to acquire or consume and adequate diet quality or sufficient quantity of
Like Friedman explains, funding for education is determined by property taxes meaning the most expensive homes are taxed the most, which ultimately contributes to funding for education. Districts like Wapato, Toppenish and Granger suffer from this because of the lack of funding. In The World is Flat Friedman states “Without any question the wealthiest school districts attracted the best teachers, principals, and curriculum planners, along with the most demanding parents and PTAs, while the poorest districts attracted the weakest teachers and principals and parents who had to work three jobs just to survive.” This definitely can relate to what we see in our valley. For instance if we compare West Valley High School to Toppenish High School, from personal experience, the evidence is clear that students are more prepared for college coming out of a school like West Valley. In the New York Time’s book Class Matters it says that “Students like these remain in college because they can hardly imagine doing otherwise. Their parents, understanding the importance of a bachelor’s degree, spent hours reading to them, researching schools, and making it clear to them that they simply must graduate from college.” In other words, educated parents stress the importance of a college education and take action from the early school years of their child. On the other hand, a
When compared to suburban and rural counterparts, are students in urban and urban high poverty schools educated on the same education level?
There are connections with bad education and the inner cities living in poverty. For starters, disadvantaged neighborhoods are characterized by few well educated adults. This can make things for the youth growing up in these bad areas much harder. If that is not enough, simply growing up in a poor neighborhood decreases the chance of finishing high school. It is no secret that the crime rates in inner cities are through the roof. What
Health care is a huge issue in America. A lot of people do not realize that one of the reasons most students do not attend school in urban areas is because they have no health care. Their parents more than likely don’t work a job where there is no health care provided and they make to much money to qualify for medicaid. Its a never ending cycle. You also mentioned standardized testing. Standardized testing also plays a factor in funding for the school. If the school does a great job on the testing they get more government money. The schools that do poorly on the test are usually in the urban and rural areas and they get as much funding as the other schools. The schools in the urban and rural areas need the most funding and help to help better
In the country, education for kids K-12 is a lot better than in the cities. Families with small children tend to like enrolling them in a smaller school because it’s quiet and safe for their children, and the teachers are with the same children every day and for years sometimes. However, sending them to a bigger school can get them into the wrong kind of crowds and not get to know all their teachers because of the big diversity there is. In the country the ratio of students to the teacher is lower than the city whereas parents of children in the city have a number of choices available for the education. Children and can often select from a long list of both public and private school districts in urban living. Public schools are often filled with a lot of students and are packed into small classrooms however that help the sports team, music, and other elective programs out. Where on the downfall of smaller schools, there are less options but children are more able to make the
Let’s re-examine the inner city school mentioned above. What are some assumptions about this school? It is a public school, it is in an area with lower incomes, the children and teachers who populate this school are mostly of a singular race or ethnicity, the education they receive may be less than sufficient, the majority of the children will not go on to higher education, it would take too many resources to fix a school in this area. What are some assumptions about a school in the suburbs? It may be public, the surrounding area is mostly middle class families, the teachers and children who populate the school are mostly of a singular race, the education is sufficient or above the current standard, the majority of children will go on to higher education, it is worth the effort to put resources into enhancing the school.